New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-363 Exam - Topic 15 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-363 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 15
[All JN0-363 Questions]

Exhibit

You are asked to configure the OSPF environment to prevent the DRother routers from participating in DR/BDR election.

Referring to the exhibit, which command will accomplish this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Kristeen at Jul 07, 2023, 12:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-363 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Miles
3 months ago
Wait, can we really skip DR/BDR elections like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
3 months ago
Totally agree with D, it makes sense for DRother.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
4 months ago
C looks interesting, but does it really work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
4 months ago
I think A is better for priority settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
4 months ago
Option D is the way to go for p2p setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
4 months ago
I believe the command with interface-type nbma is meant for non-broadcast, but I’m not confident it will stop DRother from participating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether I should focus on priority or interface type. I need to recall which one prevents DRother participation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
5 months ago
I remember a practice question about OSPF elections, and I feel like setting the interface type to p2p might be the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
5 months ago
I think the command to set the priority is important, but I'm not sure if it's the right interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I need to create the vault file, add the variables, and encrypt it with a password. The password is stored in a separate file, so I'll need to make sure I have the right permissions on that as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
5 months ago
Easy peasy! The answer is clearly A - you need Arista products with management XMPP enabled. I've worked with this before, so I'm confident in that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. I just need to find the most cost-effective way to meet the 200-unit requirement for component H, given the labor constraints. I'm confident I can figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. Why would the ESP packets from spoke2 to spoke1 be blocked if the tunnel is up? I'll need to double-check the IPsec protocol details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
10 months ago
The DRother routers must be trying to crash the election like a bunch of party crashers. C is the way to keep them out of the OSPF bash.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
10 months ago
I bet the exam writer had a good laugh coming up with these options. 'interface ge---0/0/1'? Really? C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Jerrod
8 months ago
Definitely, option C is the correct command to prevent DRother routers from participating in the DR/BDR election.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
8 months ago
Yeah, option C is the only one that makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
9 months ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roxane
10 months ago
Hmm, D seems tempting, but I think C is the way to go. Setting the interface type to NBMA is the surest way to keep those pesky DRother routers out of the election.
upvoted 0 times
Viola
8 months ago
I think D is the correct answer because setting the interface type to point-to-point will ensure that only the designated router and backup designated router participate in the election.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
8 months ago
But what about setting the priority to 255 on interface ge-0/0/1? Wouldn't that also achieve the same result?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
9 months ago
I agree, setting the interface type to NBMA will prevent the DRother routers from participating in the DR/BDR election.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loise
10 months ago
Option B is a bit strange. Doesn't it just set the priority without actually disabling the DRother routers? I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
Marti
8 months ago
Great, let's go with option C then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
8 months ago
That makes sense, option C is the correct choice to prevent DRother routers from participating in the DR/BDR election.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
8 months ago
I agree, option C specifically sets the interface type to non-broadcast multi-access (NBMA) which prevents DRother routers from participating in the election.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
8 months ago
I think option B only sets the priority, it doesn't disable the DRother routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
8 months ago
Let's go with option C then. It should help us achieve our goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
9 months ago
Yeah, C specifies the interface type as non-broadcast multi-access, which should exclude DRother routers from the election.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
9 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice to achieve the desired outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
9 months ago
I agree, I'm also leaning towards option C to prevent the DRother routers from participating in the election.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
9 months ago
I think C is the correct command to prevent DRother routers from participating in the election.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
10 months ago
I agree, option B doesn't seem to address the issue. C looks like the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
10 months ago
I think option B just sets the priority, it doesn't disable the DRother routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebecka
10 months ago
I see your point, but I still think A) is the best choice because setting the priority to 255 will ensure the router becomes the DR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 interface ge---0/0/1 interface-type p2p.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
10 months ago
I think the answer is A) set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 interface ge-0/0/l priority 255.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
11 months ago
The correct answer is option C - set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 interface ge-0/0/1 interface-type nbma. This will configure the interface as a non-broadcast multi-access (NBMA) type, which prevents the DRother routers from participating in the DR/BDR election.
upvoted 0 times
Lennie
9 months ago
No, the correct answer is option C
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
10 months ago
I think the answer is option A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Franklyn
11 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. Let's review the exhibit again to make sure we understand the requirements correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 interface ge---0/0/1 interface-type p2p.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 interface ge-0/0/l priority 255.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel