New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-351 Exam - Topic 9 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-351 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 9
[All JN0-351 Questions]

Exhibit

You are a network operator troubleshooting BGP connectivity.

Which two statements are correct about the output shown in the exhibit? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Option B suggests that the BGP session is not established. This is correct because in the output, the state of the BGP session is shown as ''Idle''.In BGP, an ''Idle'' state means that the BGP session is not currently established1.

Option C suggests that R1 is configured for AS 65400.This is also correct because in the output, it's shown that the local AS number is 654001.The local AS number represents the Autonomous System (AS) number of the router on which you're checking the BGP session1.


by Carmelina at Mar 25, 2025, 12:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-351 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Antione
2 months ago
Totally agree, the session isn't up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
2 months ago
Wait, are they really exchanging IPv4 routes? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
2 months ago
I think the BGP session is not established.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
3 months ago
R1 is definitely AS 65400.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
3 months ago
Peer 10.32.1.2 is AS 63645, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
3 months ago
I remember that if the routers are exchanging routes, it usually means the session is up, so I think option D is likely incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about option A. I thought the peer's AS number should match the local AS for the session to be established, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option C could be right too. I practiced a similar question where the AS number was crucial for understanding the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
4 months ago
I think option B might be correct since I remember something about session states in BGP. If it's not established, that could definitely cause connectivity issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
4 months ago
This seems straightforward. The peer AS number doesn't match the local AS, so that's likely the problem. I'll select the two correct statements and move on to the next question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
4 months ago
Alright, let me think this through step-by-step. I'll start by identifying the key information in the output, then consider the possible causes for the session not being established.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
4 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. The output shows the session is not established, but I'm not sure why. I'll need to review my BGP knowledge to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The peer IP address and AS number don't match, so that's probably the issue. I'm pretty confident I can get this one right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky BGP troubleshooting question. I'll need to carefully analyze the output and think through the possible issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
10 months ago
I think option B is incorrect because the BGP session appears to be established in the exhibit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
10 months ago
I believe option C is also correct as it mentions the AS number of R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
10 months ago
You know, I've seen some pretty wild BGP issues in my time, but this one takes the cake. Mismatched AS numbers? That's a classic network admin nightmare right there.
upvoted 0 times
Veta
10 months ago
B) The BGP session is not established.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
10 months ago
A) Peer 10.32.1.2 is configured for AS 63645.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenny
10 months ago
I agree with Noah, option A seems to be the right choice based on the exhibit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
11 months ago
I think option A is correct because it shows the peer AS number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
11 months ago
Hah, I bet the network operator is scratching their head trying to figure this one out. Clearly, the configuration is not matching up here.
upvoted 0 times
Craig
10 months ago
The BGP session is not established.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
10 months ago
Peer 10.32.1.2 is configured for AS 63645.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
10 months ago
B) The BGP session is not established.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
10 months ago
A) Peer 10.32.1.2 is configured for AS 63645.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shayne
11 months ago
Wait, so the peer is configured for a different AS number than the local router? That seems like a major issue to me. No wonder the session isn't established!
upvoted 0 times
Aretha
10 months ago
Looks like R1 is configured for AS 65400.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
10 months ago
That's right, the BGP session is not established.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
11 months ago
Yes, Peer 10.32.1.2 is configured for AS 63645.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel