New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-351 Exam - Topic 3 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-351 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-351 Questions]

Which two statements about redundant trunk groups on EX Series switches are correct? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lai
3 months ago
Totally agree with D, it's automatic failover!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the spanning tree part in A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
3 months ago
C seems off to me, not sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
4 months ago
I think B is also correct, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
4 months ago
A and D are spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
4 months ago
I definitely recall that spanning tree is involved, but I can't remember if it applies to redundant trunk groups. I think I might go with B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the control traffic on the secondary link. I thought it was only allowed on the primary link, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like option D sounds right since it mentions automatic failover. But what about option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
5 months ago
I think I remember that redundant trunk groups do load balancing, so maybe option B is correct? But I'm not sure about the spanning tree part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the layer 2 control traffic part. I'll need to double-check the details on that before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Redundant trunk groups use active-standby configuration, not spanning tree, and they automatically fail over if the active link goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
5 months ago
I think the key is to focus on the differences between the options. Spanning tree, load balancing, and automatic failover are all important concepts to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. I know redundant trunk groups are used for redundancy, but I'm not sure about the specifics on how they work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key details about redundant trunk groups on EX Series switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
12 months ago
Whoa, this question is like a game of Tetris - gotta fit all the pieces together correctly! I'm betting on A and B, but I could be way off. Maybe I should have consulted the Magic 8-Ball before answering.
upvoted 0 times
Patti
11 months ago
User4: A and B are the correct statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
11 months ago
User3: I'm not sure about A, but B sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
11 months ago
User2: Yeah, A and B make sense to me too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
11 months ago
User1: I think A and B are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thea
12 months ago
Haha, redundant trunk groups, eh? Sounds like a fancy way of saying 'backup plan in case the main plan fails.' Better have a plan B, right? Anyway, I think B and D are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
12 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure about C, but the other three options sound plausible. Hmm, maybe I should have studied harder for this exam.
upvoted 0 times
Patti
11 months ago
User 2: Yeah, and B makes sense too, having a backup link is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
11 months ago
User 1: I think A is correct, it helps balance the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latricia
1 year ago
I'm not sure about C and D. Can someone explain why they are not correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
1 year ago
I'd go with A and B. Load-balancing across the uplink interfaces and automatic failover on link failure are critical for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
I agree with Desmond. A and B make sense because they ensure traffic balance and failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 year ago
B and D seem to be the correct options here. The secondary link should take over if the active link fails, and the redundant trunk group should be connected to the same aggregation switch.
upvoted 0 times
Magda
11 months ago
Definitely, having redundant trunk groups can help ensure network reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
12 months ago
That makes sense. It's important for redundancy and failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
12 months ago
I agree, and I think D is also correct because redundant trunk groups must be connected to the same aggregation switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
12 months ago
I think B is correct because the secondary link should take over if the active link fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desmond
1 year ago
I think the correct statements are A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel