New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-351 Exam - Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-351 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-351 Questions]

What are two reasons for creating multiple areas in OSPF? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

Option A is correct. Creating multiple areas in OSPF can help to reduce the convergence time . This is because changes in one area do not affect other areas, so fewer routers need to run the SPF algorithm in response to a change.

Option D is correct. Creating multiple areas in OSPF can help to reduce Link State Advertisement (LSA) flooding across the network. This is because LSAs are not flooded out of their area of origin.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Shenika
3 months ago
Isn't it risky to have too many areas though?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
3 months ago
Reducing the LSDB size is key too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
4 months ago
Wait, I thought more adjacencies were a good thing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
4 months ago
Totally agree, it also speeds up convergence!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
4 months ago
OSPF areas help reduce LSA flooding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
4 months ago
I definitely recall that reducing LSA flooding is important, but I’m a bit hazy on the second reason. Maybe it’s about managing adjacencies?
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
4 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think increasing the size of the LSDB was mentioned, but I’m not confident that’s a reason for multiple areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about reducing convergence time being a benefit of multiple areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
5 months ago
I think one reason for creating multiple areas in OSPF is to reduce LSA flooding across the network. That sounds familiar from my studies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think the key is to understand the benefits of the OSPF area structure. I'm leaning towards A and D, but I want to double-check my understanding before submitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know OSPF uses areas, but I'm not totally clear on the specific reasons for having multiple areas. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
5 months ago
Easy peasy! The correct answers are A and D - creating multiple areas reduces convergence time and LSA flooding across the network. Gotta love that OSPF area hierarchy!
upvoted 0 times
...
James
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know OSPF uses areas to manage the size of the network, but I'm not sure of the specific reasons for creating multiple areas. I'll have to think about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the reasons for creating multiple areas in OSPF, not just general OSPF concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
5 months ago
This is a great question that really tests our understanding of PCE and network protocols. I'm confident I can work through this and identify the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty good about this one. The application model and the question description make it clear that Option D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
5 months ago
I'm confident I can solve this. The key is to use the right combination of JMS features to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel