MENU
Which ONE of the following options is NOT a benefit of test automation?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium ISTQB-CTFL Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Test Management tools are designed to support the planning, execution, and monitoring of the testing process. They provide features for managing test cases, test runs, tracking defects, and reporting on testing activities. However, the statement in option C describes Test Management tools as monitoring and reporting on the system's behavior during testing activities, which is not accurate. Test Management tools focus on the testing process itself rather than on the behavior of the system under test.
Test data preparation tools (A) indeed create and manage test data for use during test execution.
Test execution tools (B) automate the execution of test cases and the comparison of actual outcomes against expected results.
Test comparators (D) are tools that compare actual outcomes with expected outcomes, highlighting discrepancies.
Therefore, option C is the correct answer as it inaccurately describes the function of Test Management tools.
34 comments · newest first
KE
Kenneth
10 months ago
B and C are definitely benefits, but D is a stretch.
EU
Eugene
11 months ago
D makes sense, but I think some manual testing is still useful.
FL
Floyd
11 months ago
I thought A was the answer at first. Surprised it's D!
VE
Veda
11 months ago
Totally agree, D is the right choice.
TA
Tamra
11 months ago
D is definitely not a benefit. Manual testing is still needed!
VE
Verdell
12 months ago
I vaguely recall that while automation is great, it doesn't eliminate manual testing completely, so D could be the one that's not a benefit.
RA
Raul
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I think C makes sense too, as automation helps reduce human errors but doesn't prevent them entirely.
TA
Tatum
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like D might be the right answer since we still need manual testing for certain scenarios.
CH
Christene
1 year ago
I remember discussing how test automation can speed up execution times, so I think A is definitely a benefit.
ED
Eden
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is D. Test automation is super useful, but it can't get rid of manual testing entirely. That's just not a realistic benefit.
AR
Arleen
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Option D has to be the correct answer. Test automation is great, but it can't completely replace manual testing, so that's the one that's not a benefit.
ED
Edgar
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know test automation has a lot of benefits, but I'm not sure which one is not a benefit. Let me think this through carefully.
BE
Bernadine
1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident that option D is the correct answer since test automation can't completely eliminate the need for manual testing.
AL
Alba
1 year ago
Hmm, the fact that the business owns the freehold property could be a limitation, since the industry norm is to lease. I'll need to consider that.
KI
King
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The three main categories are flow manufacturing, intermittent manufacturing, and project manufacturing. I remember learning about the differences between these approaches in class.
LO
Lorrie
1 year ago
I think it might be a primary building block for cloud-based data centers, similar to what we covered in the last set of practice questions.
AL
Alexis
1 year ago
Calling search spaces seem like a logical choice here, as they control the calling permissions and could be used to restrict toll fraud. But I'm not 100% confident that's the primary mechanism.
LO
Lorita
1 year ago
Gotta go with B. Automation may be more consistent, but it can't match the nuanced, contextual understanding that a human tester brings to the table.
TO
Tom
1 year ago
I think a combination of both automation and manual testing is the way to go for a comprehensive testing strategy.
DE
Delsie
1 year ago
Automation is great for speeding up the process, but human testers provide valuable insights.
RA
Raylene
1 year ago
I agree, human testers can pick up on things that automation might miss.
CO
Colette
1 year ago
Ha! Eliminating manual testing entirely? That's like saying we can replace all human chefs with robots. Not happening anytime soon.
NA
Natalie
1 year ago
Ha! Eliminating manual testing entirely? That's like saying we can replace all human chefs with robots. Not happening anytime soon.
JE
Jenifer
1 year ago
C) Prevention of simple human errors
CH
Cherri
1 year ago
B) More objective assessment
LE
Leatha
1 year ago
A) Reduced test execution times
AL
Alease
1 year ago
I think Option B is the correct answer. Test automation can actually introduce bias and be less objective than manual testing in some cases.
VO
Von
1 year ago
Option D seems like a stretch. Test automation can never completely replace manual testing. There will always be some aspects that require human touch.
CO
Corrie
1 year ago
C) Prevention of simple human errors
EN
Ena
1 year ago
B) More objective assessment
BE
Bettyann
1 year ago
A) Reduced test execution times
LU
Luther
2 years ago
I agree with Aileen, D) Eliminating completely the need for manual testing is not a benefit of test automation because manual testing is still required for some aspects like usability testing.
AI
Aileen
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Eliminating completely the need for manual testing because some manual testing is still necessary for certain scenarios.
BI
Billi
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) Eliminating completely the need for manual testing.