Hmm, I'm not so sure. Wouldn't training developers to write more secure code also fall under the cost of detection? They're learning to identify and prevent defects early on.
I agree with Audra, Option D is the correct answer. Investing in testing and quality assurance upfront is way more cost-effective than fixing issues later on.
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Designing test cases and writing test scripts is all about detecting and identifying issues, so it fits the cost of detection category perfectly.
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Designing test cases and writing test scripts is all about detecting and identifying issues, so it fits the cost of detection category perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Dorian
4 months agoRusty
4 months agoTroy
4 months agoArt
4 months agoBrock
4 months agoDorethea
4 months agoCassi
4 months agoStephaine
3 months agoKaty
3 months agoCrissy
4 months agoRemedios
4 months agoMelvin
4 months agoTamie
4 months agoDorian
5 months agoAudra
5 months agoDana
4 months agoElke
4 months ago