Hmm, I'm not so sure. Wouldn't training developers to write more secure code also fall under the cost of detection? They're learning to identify and prevent defects early on.
I agree with Audra, Option D is the correct answer. Investing in testing and quality assurance upfront is way more cost-effective than fixing issues later on.
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Designing test cases and writing test scripts is all about detecting and identifying issues, so it fits the cost of detection category perfectly.
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Designing test cases and writing test scripts is all about detecting and identifying issues, so it fits the cost of detection category perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Dorian
28 days agoRusty
1 months agoTroy
13 days agoArt
19 days agoBrock
23 days agoDorethea
1 months agoCassi
1 months agoStephaine
8 days agoKaty
9 days agoCrissy
14 days agoRemedios
18 days agoMelvin
1 months agoTamie
1 months agoDorian
1 months agoAudra
1 months agoDana
1 months agoElke
1 months ago