New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB CTAL-TM Exam - Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CTAL-TM exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All CTAL-TM Questions]

Your last project was released three months ago and used a risk-based approach. In production, a number of serious failures in low risk areas have occurred.

What is the most important lesson to be learned from this information? [2]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Earnestine
3 days ago
C) The project manager should have set stakeholder expectations for serious failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
8 days ago
D) Future projects should test the lower risk areas first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
13 days ago
B) A broader cross-functional team should contribute to the risk analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
18 days ago
I feel like C is important too, but setting expectations might not directly address the failures we saw. I wish we had more examples to clarify this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
24 days ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought the lessons learned session was crucial, so A might be the answer. But then again, it could be too late to do that after deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
29 days ago
I think D makes sense because testing lower risk areas first could prevent serious failures. I feel like we practiced a similar question on prioritizing testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
1 month ago
I remember discussing how risk analysis should involve more perspectives, so B seems relevant. But I'm not entirely sure if that's the most important lesson.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 month ago
I think the answer is B. A broader cross-functional team could have provided more diverse perspectives and caught those low-risk failures during the risk analysis. The other options don't seem to address the core issue as directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
1 month ago
I'm a bit confused. Why would testing the lower risk areas first be the solution? Wouldn't that just delay addressing the actual issues? I'm stuck between B and C, but I'm not sure which one is the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
2 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The most important lesson is that the project manager should have set better stakeholder expectations. The failures in low-risk areas show that the risk analysis was flawed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
2 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. The key seems to be that serious failures occurred in low-risk areas, even though a risk-based approach was used. I'm leaning towards option B - a broader team could have helped identify more risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the question. Maybe I should re-read it a few times to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel