Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam ATM Topic 2 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 2
[All ATM Questions]

Consider an information system of a Pay-Tv company based on a SOA architecture.

The integrated system currently consists of three core systems:

- a CRM (Customer Relationship Management) system

- a BRM (Billing and Revenue Management) system

- a CAS (Conditional Access System) system all of them communicating with SOA Middleware.

You have been asked to manage the testing activities for the integration of two additional off-theshelf systems from two different vendors: a SMS (Short Message Service) server and an IVR (Interactive Voice Response) system.

Assume that there is a high likelihood that the two off-the-shelf systems will be low-quality and that you have a clear proof that the testing performed by the two vendors on their systems has been unsystematic and unprofessional. This obviously leads to higher quality risk for the overall integrated system.

You are the Test Manager of this project. Your main goal is to plan for testing activities to mitigate this risk.

Which of the following answers best describes the test activities (assuming it is possible to perform all of them) you should plan for?

K4 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Haley
1 days ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the different testing approaches to mitigate the risk of the low-quality off-the-shelf systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
2 months ago
Haha, these vendors must think we were born yesterday! Option D is the only way to go. Retesting, integration, the whole nine yards. Can't let a couple of cowboys ruin the show, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
7 days ago
Option D is definitely the way to go. Retesting is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shalon
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option C. A system integration test and an end-to-end test should give us a good handle on how everything's working together. Though I do like the sound of that 'adequate retesting' in option D. Gotta make sure those external systems are up to par.
upvoted 0 times
Kasandra
6 days ago
Definitely, option C seems like the most comprehensive approach. We need to make sure everything integrates well before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
2 months ago
Yeah, I think option C is the way to go. It covers all the bases and ensures everything is working together smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
2 months ago
I agree, option C sounds like a solid plan. Testing at both the system integration level and end-to-end level is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rueben
3 months ago
Option D all the way! Retesting those off-the-shelf systems is a must. Can't risk integrating faulty components and having the whole system go haywire. I bet the vendors are just trying to pawn off their junk on us.
upvoted 0 times
Eladia
2 months ago
Absolutely! It's crucial to ensure the quality of each component before integrating them into the overall system. Option D provides a comprehensive approach to mitigate the risks associated with low-quality off-the-shelf systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
2 months ago
Option D all the way! Retesting those off-the-shelf systems is a must. Can't risk integrating faulty components and having the whole system go haywire. I bet the vendors are just trying to pawn off their junk on us.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shalon
3 months ago
I believe option D is the best choice for mitigating the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
3 months ago
I think option D is the best choice here. Given the high likelihood of low quality in the off-the-shelf systems, it's crucial to plan for adequate retesting before moving on to the integration and end-to-end tests. It's better to be safe than sorry, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Emogene
2 months ago
Yes, I think it's important to prioritize re-testing to catch any potential issues early on before moving forward with integration testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
2 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the most thorough approach to ensure the overall integrated system is of high quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maybelle
3 months ago
I agree with Tashia, re-testing is crucial to ensure quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
3 months ago
I think we should plan for adequate re-testing of both systems.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel