ISTQB Exam ATM Topic 3 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam

Question #: 53
Topic #: 3

[All ATM Questions]

A chart showing the trend in the lag time from defect reporting to resolution during system testing is also available. The chart shows that the daily closure period is consistently and significantly above the rolling closure period for a long period of the system testing phase. Almost all defects found during system testing have been related to the system as a whole, not related to single units or integrations issues. Almost all quality risks have been addressed during the unit and integration testing phase and no residual quality risks were present in the integrated system. This has been confirmed by exploratory testing sessions performed during system testing, targeted at finding defects in these quality risk areas. Based on the given information only, which one of the following areas would you expect to be considered more in the retrospective meeting in order to be improved?

K3 3 credits

AThe requirements review

BThe defect management process

CThe quality risk analysis process

DThe system design and architecture design reviews

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Cherry at Aug 08, 2024, 08:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Rickie

10 months ago

I think both defect management and quality risk analysis processes are important to improve.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardo

10 months ago

I believe the quality risk analysis process should also be looked into.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joni

10 months ago

I agree with Solange, the trend in lag time shows there might be issues there.

upvoted 0 times

...

Solange

10 months ago

I think the defect management process should be considered more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Twana

10 months ago

I think both the defect management process and the quality risk analysis process should be on the agenda for improvement in the retrospective meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

11 months ago

I believe the quality risk analysis process should also be discussed, as almost all quality risks were addressed during unit and integration testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Solange

11 months ago

Haha, 'secret sauce'? I think you've been watching too many cooking shows, my friend. But in all seriousness, the defect management process does seem like the key area to focus on here. Gotta keep those bugs in check, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Tequila

10 months ago

D) The system design and architecture design reviews

upvoted 0 times

...

Alonzo

10 months ago

C) The quality risk analysis process

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystal

10 months ago

B) The defect management process

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

10 months ago

A) The requirements review

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlena

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. The quality risk analysis process might be worth a closer look too. If they managed to address all the risks during unit and integration testing, that's pretty impressive. Maybe they can share their secret sauce with the rest of us.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nakita

11 months ago

I agree, the defect management process is the most likely area to be targeted for improvement. With so many system-wide defects, they need to take a closer look at how they're identifying, prioritizing, and resolving issues during testing.

upvoted 0 times

Lynelle

11 months ago

B: Yeah, it seems like they need to improve how they handle and resolve system-wide defects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

11 months ago

A: I think the defect management process definitely needs some attention.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alesia

12 months ago

I agree with Izetta, the trend in lag time from defect reporting to resolution indicates a need to improve the defect management process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

12 months ago

I think the defect management process should be considered more in the retrospective meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Royce

12 months ago

The defect management process seems like the obvious choice here. The chart shows a consistent and significant gap between daily and rolling closure, so there's clearly room for improvement in how defects are being handled.

upvoted 0 times