New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATM Exam - Topic 2 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 2
[All ATM Questions]

For which of the following activities would the costs be classified as a cost of detection? K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Noel at Sep 18, 2024, 09:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Maurine
3 months ago
I didn't realize re-running tests counted as detection costs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about B? Seems more like training costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
3 months ago
No way, D is more about fixing issues, not detecting them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
4 months ago
I think A could also fit, but not as clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
4 months ago
C is definitely a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
4 months ago
I feel like fixing field failures is more about costs of failure rather than detection. So, I’m leaning towards C as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about A and C. Writing test specs seems like it could be related, but I guess it's more about preventing issues rather than detecting them?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think re-running tests is definitely a cost of detection. So, C seems right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
5 months ago
I think cost of detection relates to identifying defects, so maybe it's C? But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
5 months ago
I'm confident that the costs of fixing field failures would be classified as a cost of failure, not detection. I'm leaning towards option C as the best answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The costs of writing test specifications would be a cost of prevention, not detection. I'm going to go with option C for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between the cost categories. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand them properly before answering this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the costs of re-running a test case to verify a fix would be considered a cost of detection. That seems like the most obvious answer to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the definitions of the different cost categories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
If I recall correctly, Geth is open source, which means it's accessible for everyone to contribute. That makes option C look familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 year ago
But wouldn't fixing field failures also be considered a cost of detection, since it involves identifying and correcting defects found in the field?
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
1 year ago
I agree with Delfina, because detecting defects during testing is part of the cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
1 year ago
C, no doubt about it. Though I wish I could just wave a magic wand and make all the defects disappear!
upvoted 0 times
An
1 year ago
D) Fixing field failures
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
1 year ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
1 year ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 year ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renea
1 year ago
Option C, easy peasy. Unless you're a software development superhero who writes bug-free code on the first try every time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
1 year ago
C is the right answer. Debugging and confirming bug fixes - that's textbook detection work right there.
upvoted 0 times
Reynalda
1 year ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
1 year ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
1 year ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delfina
1 year ago
I think the costs for re-running a test case would be classified as a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd have to go with C. Anything related to verifying and validating fixes should be considered a detection cost.
upvoted 0 times
Franklyn
1 year ago
D) Fixing field failures
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 year ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
1 year ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
1 year ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erick
1 year ago
Definitely C. Trying to catch and fix issues early in the testing phase is crucial for cost-effective quality assurance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
1 year ago
Option C seems the most appropriate here. Rerunning a test to verify a fix is a key part of the detection process.
upvoted 0 times
Toi
1 year ago
I agree, that definitely falls under cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
1 year ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel