Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam ATM Topic 2 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 2
[All ATM Questions]

The main objectives the senior management team wants to achieve are:

- to reduce the costs associated with dynamic testing

- to use reviews to ensure that the project is on course for success and following the plan

- to use reviews as a well-documented and effective bug-removal activity following a formal process with well-defined roles

- to determine the effectiveness of reviews in terms of phase containment

- to improve phase containment effectiveness

Which of the following answers would you expect to describe the best way to achieve these objectives?

K4 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lorrie at Jul 03, 2023, 11:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Tarra
11 days ago
I'm going with Option B. Anything that can help 'reduce the costs associated with dynamic testing' is a winner in my book!
upvoted 0 times
Caprice
14 hours ago
I'm going with Option B. Anything that can help 'reduce the costs associated with dynamic testing' is a winner in my book!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darrin
13 days ago
Option B is the way to go, no doubt. Formal reviews and a robust defect analysis process? Sign me up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
14 days ago
Option B is the clear winner here. Formal reviews and a data-driven approach to defect analysis - that's the secret sauce to success!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
14 days ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Option D also seems reasonable, as identifying the phase where bugs were introduced could be useful for improving phase containment effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
22 days ago
I agree, Option B is the way to go. It focuses on the right activities like reviews and defect analysis, which align with the management team's objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
23 days ago
Option B seems to cover all the key objectives mentioned in the question. Formal exit-phase reviews at the end of each phase, combined with a defect analysis process, would be the best approach to achieve the stated goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also work well in ensuring bug-removal activities are effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 months ago
I agree with Georgiann, option D seems to be the most effective in improving phase containment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
2 months ago
I think option D would be the best way to achieve the objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also be a good choice. It mentions analyzing bugs found during testing to determine the people responsible for those bugs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
I agree with Shawnna. Option D seems to focus on identifying when bugs were introduced, which can help improve phase containment effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
2 months ago
I think option D would be the best way to achieve the objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel