New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 2 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

You are performing a quality risk analysis for a CSCI (Computer Software Configuration Item) used to implement a CBIT (Continuous Built-In Test) module of a safety-critical system. During the quality risk analysis you are trying to identify the ways in which failures of the CBIT module can occur, for each of them trying to determine the potential causes and likely effects, and the risk level (calculated as the product of three factors: severity, occurrence and detection). Which of the following risk analysis techniques are you working with? K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Chauncey
3 days ago
B) Failure Mode and Effect Analysis - classic choice for this type of risk assessment. Wouldn't want any safety-critical failures slipping through!
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
9 days ago
Hmm, I was thinking D) Cost of Exposure, but FMEA makes more sense for this kind of analysis. Good catch!
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
14 days ago
I agree, B) is the correct answer. FMEA is the way to go for a safety-critical system like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
19 days ago
Definitely B) Failure Mode and Effect Analysis. That's the classic risk analysis technique for identifying potential failure modes and their effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
24 days ago
I definitely remember that severity, occurrence, and detection are key factors in risk analysis, which makes me lean towards B, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
29 days ago
The question sounds familiar; I feel like we discussed lightweight product risk analysis techniques in class, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
1 month ago
I remember practicing with the Wide Band Delphi method, but it seems more focused on gathering expert opinions rather than identifying failures directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
1 month ago
I think this might be related to Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only technique we can use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 month ago
I'm not too familiar with these specific terms like CSCI and CBIT, but the overall process of analyzing potential failures and their impacts seems straightforward. I think I'll go with the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis option, as that seems to best match the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
2 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to focus on the specific steps mentioned in the question - identifying failure modes, causes, effects, and calculating the risk level. That sounds like a classic FMEA approach to me, so I'm going with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions a "quality risk analysis" for a CSCI and CBIT module, but I'm not sure if that's the same as a full FMEA. Maybe it's a more lightweight version, like a product risk analysis technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
2 months ago
I think this is a Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) question. We need to identify potential failure modes, their causes, and effects, and then assess the risk level based on severity, occurrence, and detection.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel