Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 2 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

You are performing a quality risk analysis for a CSCI (Computer Software Configuration Item) used to implement a CBIT (Continuous Built-In Test) module of a safety-critical system. During the quality risk analysis you are trying to identify the ways in which failures of the CBIT module can occur, for each of them trying to determine the potential causes and likely effects, and the risk level (calculated as the product of three factors: severity, occurrence and detection). Which of the following risk analysis techniques are you working with? K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Ula at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Walton
28 days ago
I lean towards B as well. It helps assess severity and effects clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
1 month ago
A) Lightweight product risk analysis could work too, but not as thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
1 month ago
Agreed, B makes sense. It focuses on identifying failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
1 month ago
I think it's B) Failure Mode and Effect Analysis. It fits the scenario well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 months ago
Cost of Exposure? Really? That doesn't seem relevant here at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
2 months ago
I thought C) Wide Band Delphi was more about gathering expert opinions, not risk analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not A? Seems like a simpler approach could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
2 months ago
I agree, FMEA is essential for identifying potential failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
2 months ago
Definitely B) Failure Mode and Effect Analysis. It's the go-to for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
2 months ago
Haha, imagine if the answer was C) Wide Band Delphi. That would be overkill for a simple CSCI quality risk analysis!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
3 months ago
B) Failure Mode and Effect Analysis - classic choice for this type of risk assessment. Wouldn't want any safety-critical failures slipping through!
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
3 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking D) Cost of Exposure, but FMEA makes more sense for this kind of analysis. Good catch!
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
4 months ago
I agree, B) is the correct answer. FMEA is the way to go for a safety-critical system like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
4 months ago
Definitely B) Failure Mode and Effect Analysis. That's the classic risk analysis technique for identifying potential failure modes and their effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
4 months ago
I definitely remember that severity, occurrence, and detection are key factors in risk analysis, which makes me lean towards B, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
4 months ago
The question sounds familiar; I feel like we discussed lightweight product risk analysis techniques in class, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
4 months ago
I remember practicing with the Wide Band Delphi method, but it seems more focused on gathering expert opinions rather than identifying failures directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
4 months ago
I think this might be related to Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only technique we can use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
5 months ago
I'm not too familiar with these specific terms like CSCI and CBIT, but the overall process of analyzing potential failures and their impacts seems straightforward. I think I'll go with the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis option, as that seems to best match the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to focus on the specific steps mentioned in the question - identifying failure modes, causes, effects, and calculating the risk level. That sounds like a classic FMEA approach to me, so I'm going with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions a "quality risk analysis" for a CSCI and CBIT module, but I'm not sure if that's the same as a full FMEA. Maybe it's a more lightweight version, like a product risk analysis technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
5 months ago
I think this is a Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) question. We need to identify potential failure modes, their causes, and effects, and then assess the risk level based on severity, occurrence, and detection.
upvoted 0 times
Esteban
18 days ago
Agreed, it's all about identifying failure modes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
23 days ago
Definitely sounds like FMEA to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel