iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 3 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam

Question #: 68
Topic #: 3

[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

During the follow-up phase the following conditions are checked:

X1. The code has been completely reviewed

X2. All the identified defects have been correctly fixed and the modified code has been compiled successfully and run through all the static analyzers used by the project without warnings and errors X3. The modified code is available under the configuration management system with a new version number for the specified CI

If these conditions are fulfilled then the review process terminates.

Which of the following characteristics of a formal review is missing in this description? K2 1 credit

ADefined entry and exit criteria

BChecklists to be used by the reviewers

CDeliverables such as reports, evaluation sheets or other review summary sheets

DMetrics for reporting on the review effectiveness, efficiency, and progress

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Charisse at Sep 14, 2024, 05:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Martina

18 days ago

I'm feeling a bit like a code reviewer right now, trying to find the missing piece in this description. Maybe they should add a pizza break or something to keep the team motivated!

upvoted 0 times

Stefany

2 days ago

A) Defined entry and exit criteria

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryann

1 months ago

Ooh, this is a tough one. I'm going to go with C) Deliverables such as reports, evaluation sheets or other review summary sheets. It's important to have some documentation to capture the findings and decisions made during the review.

upvoted 0 times

Dan

9 days ago

User2: I agree with User1. Entry and exit criteria help keep the review process organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

26 days ago

User1: I think it's A) Defined entry and exit criteria. Those are important to know when the review process starts and ends.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nathan

1 months ago

Haha, I bet the reviewers would love to have checklists to use. That would make their job so much easier. I'm going with B) Checklists to be used by the reviewers.

upvoted 0 times

Effie

18 days ago

User2: Yeah, it would help ensure that all necessary steps are taken during the review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Floyd

29 days ago

User1: I agree, having checklists would definitely make the review process smoother.

upvoted 0 times

...

Curtis

1 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. The description seems pretty thorough to me. But I guess Metrics for reporting on the review effectiveness, efficiency, and progress could be a good answer. It's always helpful to have some data to track the review process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phyliss

2 months ago

I believe checklists to be used by the reviewers are also important for ensuring thoroughness in the review process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Grover

2 months ago

I agree with Selma, without clear entry and exit criteria, the review process may lack structure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

2 months ago

I think the missing characteristic is defined entry and exit criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dyan

2 months ago

I think the missing characteristic is the Defined entry and exit criteria. The description doesn't mention any specific criteria that need to be met before the review process can start or when it can be considered complete.

upvoted 0 times