New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 2 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

You are the Test Manager for a project to develop a client-server application that allows wine vendors to order custom-assorted packages of wines of several winemakers to sell special packages in their wine shops.

You decide to apply a blended risk-based and reactive testing strategy. Below the exit criteria for the system testing.

EXCR1- Each ''critical'' quality risk item must be covered by at least one test condition EXCR2- Each ''critical'' requirement must be covered by at least one test condition The following are the ''critical'' requirements of the application:

REQ-SEL-1. The application shall allow the user to order only one package at a time

REQ-SEL-2. The application shall allow the user to select between four different packages (2-bottles, 6-bottles, 12-bottles, 15-bottles)

REQ-SEL-3. The application shall allow the user to order a package containing at least 1 bottle and no more bottles than the package size. No error messages shall be displayed if the user selects a valid number of bottles (at least 1 bottle and no more than the package size) REQ-SEL-4. The application shall display an error message ''Invalid number of bottles'' if an invalid number of bottles is selected by the user (zero bottles or a number higher than the package size)

REQ-PAY-1. The application shall allow the user to pay with the three accepted credit cards (Visa, MasterCard, American Express)

REQ-PAY-2. The application shall display an error message ''Invalid credit card'' if invalid credit card data are given by the user

The following is the unique ''critical'' quality risk item that has been identified:

CR-RSK-1. The GUI of the application might accept non-integer values for the input field designed

to get the number of bottles from the user

Test analysis for system testing has just begun and the following test conditions have been identified.

TC-SEL-2. Test the selection of the package sizes

TC-SEL-4. Test wrong numbers of bottles for an order

TC-CR-RSK-1. Test the accepted values from the input field designed to get the number of bottles from the user Assume that you have used traceability to determine the logical test cases that cover all the requirements and the single risk item identified in that scenario.

Which of the following is a positive logical test that is complete and correct, and covers the REQSEL-4 requirement?

K3 2 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Adelle
3 months ago
D doesn't even verify anything, so it's out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
3 months ago
C is clearly the wrong answer, it should show an error!
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
3 months ago
Wait, can the app really accept non-integer values?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
I think B is the better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
4 months ago
A is definitely the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought option D was just incomplete since it doesn’t specify what to verify after trying to insert 7 bottles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
4 months ago
I practiced similar questions, and I feel like option B is wrong because it doesn't meet the requirement of selecting a valid number of bottles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think REQ-SEL-4 is about displaying an error message for invalid inputs, which makes me lean towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how positive test cases should confirm that the system behaves as expected, so I think option A is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The requirement clearly states that an error message should be displayed if an invalid number of bottles is selected, so option C is the way to go. It's the only one that explicitly verifies the expected behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if option C is completely correct, since it doesn't explicitly state that the test should pass. Maybe option D would be better, as it's more open-ended and doesn't make any assumptions about the expected result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the options. Option A says to verify that no error message is displayed, but that doesn't seem to match the requirement. I think option C is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward requirement to test. I'd go with option C - selecting a 6-bottle package and trying to enter 7 bottles, then verifying that the "Invalid number of bottles" message is displayed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know it's related to security incident management, but I'm not sure about the exact roles needed. I'll have to think it through carefully and review my notes before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
9 months ago
Nice catch on the GUI risk, TC-CR-RSK-1 should cover that. Wouldn't want someone to accidentally order a bottle and a half!
upvoted 0 times
Graciela
8 months ago
Agreed, we have to cover all angles to prevent any errors in the ordering process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
9 months ago
Definitely, TC-CR-RSK-1 will help us test that. It's important for the user experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
9 months ago
Yes, that GUI risk is crucial. We need to make sure non-integer values are not accepted.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marget
9 months ago
Haha, I bet the developers had fun coming up with these error messages. 'Invalid number of bottles' - I can just picture someone trying to order a 6-pack and putting in 20 bottles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
9 months ago
I agree, C is the correct answer. The test case verifies the expected behavior for an invalid input, which is crucial to ensure the system works as intended.
upvoted 0 times
Santos
8 months ago
Yes, C is the right option. It ensures the system handles incorrect inputs properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
8 months ago
C is the best choice. It covers the requirement of displaying an error message for an invalid input.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
8 months ago
I agree, C is the correct answer. It verifies the system's response to an invalid input.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
8 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. It tests for the 'Invalid number of bottles' message.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sue
10 months ago
Option C looks good, it covers the requirement to display an error message when an invalid number of bottles is selected.
upvoted 0 times
Dewitt
10 months ago
User 3: Yes, that test case ensures the application behaves correctly when an invalid number of bottles is selected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
10 months ago
User 2: I agree, selecting a 6-bottles package and trying to insert 7 bottles should trigger the 'Invalid number of bottles' message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
10 months ago
User 1: Option C seems to be the best choice, it covers the requirement perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rickie
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think I would go with option C as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
10 months ago
I agree with Tu, option C covers the REQ-SEL-4 requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel