Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CRISC Exam - Topic 5 Question 89 Discussion

Posted by Madalyn on Oct 24, 2024 at 06:21 PM

Which of the following would MOST effectively reduce the potential for inappropriate exposure of vulnerabilities documented in an organization's risk register?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium CRISC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
JO
Jospeh 10 months ago
I disagree, I feel like everyone should have some access.
DA
Dalene 11 months ago
Surprised that confidentiality agreements are even an option here.
LA
Laquita 11 months ago
Limiting access to just senior management seems risky.
SH
Shannan 11 months ago
Role-based access is definitely the way to go!
MA
Ma 11 months ago
I think encrypting the risk register is a must.
CH
Chauncey 12 months ago
Requiring confidentiality agreements seems like a good idea, but I don't think it would be as effective as implementing role-based access.
JO
Josue 12 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about encrypting the risk register. It sounds good, but I wonder if it would actually prevent unauthorized access effectively.
CL
Claribel 12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about access controls, and I feel like role-based access is a strong option here. It seems to balance security and usability.
JA
James 1 year ago
I think limiting access to senior management only might not be the best choice. It could lead to a lack of awareness among other staff who need to know about certain risks.
AL
Alesia 1 year ago
Implementing role-based access sounds like a smart way to control who can access the sensitive information. That might be the best approach to reduce the potential for inappropriate exposure.
JO
Jordan 1 year ago
Encrypting the risk register is a good idea, but I'm not sure if that's the most effective solution on its own. I'll need to consider the other options as well.
DA
Dan 1 year ago
Hmm, limiting access to senior management only seems a bit too restrictive. I wonder if there's a more balanced approach that still protects the information.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they could impact the risk of exposure.
MA
Margurite 1 year ago
I'm going with option C. Gotta love that role-based access - it's like a VIP pass for the vulnerability club.
SH
Shaun 1 year ago
Encrypting the risk register? Sounds like a job for the Enigma machine!
TA
Tatum 1 year ago
Option A is like putting a lock on the barn door after the horse has already bolted. Limiting access to senior management won't do much if the register is already compromised.
MA
Malcolm 1 year ago
Requiring users to sign a confidentiality agreement (option D) is a good idea, but it doesn't actually prevent the information from being exposed. It just provides a legal recourse after the fact.
LA
Laurel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
Encrypting the risk register (option E) would add an extra layer of protection to prevent unauthorized access.
BR
Brendan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
Training employees on handling sensitive information (option C) can help prevent accidental exposure.
TR
Trinidad 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
Encrypting the risk register (option C) would add an extra layer of security to prevent unauthorized access.
KA
Kate 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
Regularly updating and reviewing the risk register (option B) can help identify and address vulnerabilities in a timely manner.
TR
Tracey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
Implementing access controls (option A) would limit who can view the risk register.
SH
Shawnda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
Regularly reviewing and updating the risk register (option B) can help identify and address vulnerabilities.
TA
Tasia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
Implementing access controls (option A) would limit who can view the risk register.
MA
Marisha 1 year ago
I'd go with option C. Implementing role-based access ensures that only those who need to see the risk register can access it. That's a more comprehensive solution than just limiting it to senior management.
FR
Frankie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marisha
Definitely, it's important to have a system in place that controls who can view the risk register to prevent any inappropriate exposure.
AL
Alton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marisha
I agree, limiting access to only those who need it is crucial for protecting the organization's vulnerabilities.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marisha
Option C sounds like a good choice. Role-based access is key to keeping sensitive information secure.
IR
Irving 1 year ago
Hmm, option B seems like the most straightforward way to protect sensitive information. Encrypting the risk register would keep it secure, even if someone gained unauthorized access.
MA
Malcolm 1 year ago
↳ replying to Irving
It's important to take all necessary precautions to keep our organization's information secure.
TA
Tamie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Irving
Encrypting the risk register would definitely reduce the potential for inappropriate exposure of vulnerabilities.
BR
Brent 1 year ago
↳ replying to Irving
I agree, encryption is key in protecting sensitive information from unauthorized access.
RO
Rosina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Irving
Option B is definitely the way to go. Encrypting the risk register is a must.
BO
Bobbie 2 years ago
I think encrypting the risk register could also be effective in reducing inappropriate exposure of vulnerabilities.
ON
Ona 2 years ago
I agree with Nenita. Role-based access ensures that only authorized individuals can view the risk register.
NE
Nenita 2 years ago
I think implementing role-based access would be the best option.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel