Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CRISC Exam - Topic 3 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CRISC exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 3

[All CRISC Questions]

Which of the following is a drawback in the use of quantitative risk analysis?

AIt assigns numeric values to exposures of assets.

BIt requires more resources than other methods

CIt produces the results in numeric form.

DIt is based on impact analysis of information assets.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Janae at Apr 29, 2024, 08:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRISC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alita

7 months ago

D is important too, but it’s not really a drawback, just a method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tijuana

8 months ago

Wait, are we sure B is the only drawback? Seems like there could be more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

8 months ago

A and C are just part of the process, not drawbacks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenny

8 months ago

Totally agree with B! More resources = more complexity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenneth

8 months ago

I think B is spot on. It does take a lot of resources.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hollis

9 months ago

I’m leaning towards option D, but I’m not confident. I thought impact analysis was crucial for understanding risks, not a drawback.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rasheeda

9 months ago

I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that the complexity of the analysis could be a drawback. Maybe it's option B?

upvoted 0 times

...

Janna

9 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like assigning numeric values isn't really a drawback. It seems more like a necessary part of the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nelida

9 months ago

I remember discussing how quantitative risk analysis can be resource-intensive, so I think option B might be the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

9 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. I know quantitative risk analysis uses numeric values, but I'm not sure if that's considered a drawback. I'll have to re-read the material on the pros and cons of this approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mollie

9 months ago

I'm pretty confident the answer is B. Quantitative risk analysis involves a lot of data gathering and calculations, so it makes sense that it would require more resources than other risk analysis methods.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emmett

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe I should review my notes on quantitative risk analysis first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pete

9 months ago

This question seems straightforward. I think the answer is B - it requires more resources than other methods.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vicki

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know some of these technologies, but I'm not sure which one specifically increases the number of connections. I'll have to think it through.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The different elements of CSR seem to overlap in these options. I'll have to think it through step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

1 year ago

Hmm, I was hoping for an answer that involved unicorns or rainbows. That would have been a real drawback! But I suppose resources and effort are important too.

upvoted 0 times

Kathryn

1 year ago

Yeah, it can be a significant investment to conduct a thorough quantitative risk analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyisha

1 year ago

But in reality, the drawback is the time and cost involved in quantitative risk analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonida

1 year ago

Unicorns and rainbows would definitely make risk analysis more fun though!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ramonita

1 year ago

It's true, resources and effort are key factors in quantitative risk analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Providencia

1 year ago

I was thinking Option C, but I guess that's actually a benefit, not a drawback. Numeric results are more concrete and easier to interpret.

upvoted 0 times

Britt

1 year ago

I agree, numeric results do provide a clearer picture of the risks involved.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashonda

1 year ago

Option C: It can be difficult to assign accurate probabilities to events.

upvoted 0 times

...

Darci

1 year ago

Option B: It may not account for all possible risks and uncertainties.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaunna

1 year ago

Option A: It can be time-consuming to gather all the necessary data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christene

1 year ago

Option C: Lack of flexibility in adjusting for changing circumstances

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerrie

1 year ago

Option B: Time-consuming process to gather and analyze data

upvoted 0 times

...

Sol

1 year ago

Option A: Difficulty in assigning numerical values to all risks

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Dominga

1 year ago

I agree with Angella. Quantitative analysis is more time-consuming and expensive, but it provides more precise and data-driven results.

upvoted 0 times

Salley

1 year ago

I guess it depends on the specific needs of the project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crista

1 year ago

True, it's a trade-off between time and accuracy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanjuana

1 year ago

But on the other hand, it does give more precise results based on data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlene

1 year ago

I think one drawback is that it can be time-consuming and expensive.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Angella

1 year ago

Option B is the correct answer. Quantitative risk analysis does require more resources, such as time and expert knowledge, to implement compared to other methods.

upvoted 0 times

Fletcher

1 year ago

That's true, quantitative risk analysis can be resource-intensive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fanny

1 year ago

B) It requires more resources than other methods

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Izetta

1 year ago

But doesn't it also produce results in numeric form, which can be helpful for decision-making?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

1 year ago

I agree with Felicitas. Quantitative risk analysis can be resource-intensive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicitas

1 year ago

I think the drawback is that it requires more resources.

upvoted 0 times

...