Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CRISC Exam - Topic 11 Question 87 Discussion

Posted by Glenn on Sep 16, 2024 at 10:16 AM

When classifying and prioritizing risk responses, the areas to address FIRST are those with:

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium CRISC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
ST
Staci 10 months ago
Totally with you on C, high risk should be prioritized!
GL
Gladys 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about C? Seems a bit off.
DA
Dannette 11 months ago
C is the way to go, can't ignore high risk!
IN
India 11 months ago
I think A makes more sense, low cost is key.
ME
Melinda 11 months ago
Definitely C, high risk needs high cost effectiveness!
RE
Reita 12 months ago
I feel like we should tackle high risk levels regardless of cost effectiveness, but I can't recall the exact details from my notes.
GL
Gladys 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the cost effectiveness part. Does it mean we should avoid low cost effectiveness ratios?
BO
Boris 12 months ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized prioritizing high risk areas, so I’m leaning towards option C.
HA
Hailey 1 year ago
I think we should focus on high risk levels first, but I'm not sure if it's about cost effectiveness ratios too.
IR
Irene 1 year ago
I've reviewed the concepts, and I believe the correct answer is C. The areas with the highest risk and best cost effectiveness should be addressed first.
PE
Pearlene 1 year ago
Okay, for this type of question, I'd focus on identifying the areas with the highest priority. That means looking for the high risk, high cost effectiveness options.
LA
Lawana 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the concepts of cost effectiveness ratios and risk levels to determine the right approach.
JA
Janey 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is C, high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels.
LO
Lorita 1 year ago
I remember studying price elasticity and how it affects total revenue, but I'm not completely sure how to apply it in this scenario.
KR
Kris 2 years ago
Honestly, I'm just hoping the exam doesn't ask me to classify the risk of my exam performance. That's a whole other can of worms!
KA
Katina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kris
B) high cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels.
CH
Cherelle 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kris
C) high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels
TA
Tashia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kris
A) low cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels
BE
Benton 2 years ago
Haha, these options are like a game of Risk - go big or go home, am I right? I'm voting for C, the high-stakes play!
CH
Charlette 2 years ago
I think B sounds good. If the risk is low, why waste resources on it? Let's focus on the big-ticket items first.
DO
Dorcas 2 years ago
↳ replying to Charlette
True, finding the right balance is key in managing risk responses effectively.
GL
Gladys 2 years ago
↳ replying to Charlette
That's a good point. Maybe we should consider a balance between low and high risk items.
GU
Gussie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Charlette
True, we need to find a balance between cost and risk. Maybe a combination of both high and low risk levels is the best approach.
TH
Therese 2 years ago
↳ replying to Charlette
But what if the low risk items end up causing major issues later on?
CA
Caprice 2 years ago
↳ replying to Charlette
I agree, focusing on high cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels makes sense.
CA
Catarina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Charlette
But what about the risks with high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels? Shouldn't we address those first?
PA
Pamella 2 years ago
↳ replying to Charlette
I agree, it's important to prioritize efficiently. High cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels make sense.
RO
Ronnie 2 years ago
But wouldn't it make more sense to prioritize high risk levels first, even if the cost effectiveness ratio is high?
VE
Vernell 2 years ago
C'mon, it's gotta be the high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels! That's the whole point of prioritizing, right?
KA
Kayleigh 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vernell
True, addressing high risk areas with high cost effectiveness ratios can lead to better risk management.
ME
Merlyn 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vernell
I think the priority should be on high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels to minimize impact.
KR
Kristine 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vernell
But what about low cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels? Shouldn't we address those as well?
TO
Tomas 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vernell
I agree, we should focus on high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels first.
JA
Jackie 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
RO
Ronnie 2 years ago
I think the answer is B.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel