Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Isaca CRISC Exam - Topic 11 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CRISC exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 11
[All CRISC Questions]

When classifying and prioritizing risk responses, the areas to address FIRST are those with:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Glenn at Sep 16, 2024, 10:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRISC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Staci
6 months ago
Totally with you on C, high risk should be prioritized!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure about C? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
6 months ago
C is the way to go, can't ignore high risk!
upvoted 0 times
...
India
7 months ago
I think A makes more sense, low cost is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
7 months ago
Definitely C, high risk needs high cost effectiveness!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
7 months ago
I feel like we should tackle high risk levels regardless of cost effectiveness, but I can't recall the exact details from my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the cost effectiveness part. Does it mean we should avoid low cost effectiveness ratios?
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
7 months ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized prioritizing high risk areas, so I’m leaning towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
8 months ago
I think we should focus on high risk levels first, but I'm not sure if it's about cost effectiveness ratios too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
8 months ago
I've reviewed the concepts, and I believe the correct answer is C. The areas with the highest risk and best cost effectiveness should be addressed first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
8 months ago
Okay, for this type of question, I'd focus on identifying the areas with the highest priority. That means looking for the high risk, high cost effectiveness options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the concepts of cost effectiveness ratios and risk levels to determine the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
8 months ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is C, high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
8 months ago
I remember studying price elasticity and how it affects total revenue, but I'm not completely sure how to apply it in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 years ago
Honestly, I'm just hoping the exam doesn't ask me to classify the risk of my exam performance. That's a whole other can of worms!
upvoted 0 times
Katina
2 years ago
B) high cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 years ago
C) high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
2 years ago
A) low cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benton
2 years ago
Haha, these options are like a game of Risk - go big or go home, am I right? I'm voting for C, the high-stakes play!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
2 years ago
I think B sounds good. If the risk is low, why waste resources on it? Let's focus on the big-ticket items first.
upvoted 0 times
Dorcas
2 years ago
True, finding the right balance is key in managing risk responses effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 years ago
That's a good point. Maybe we should consider a balance between low and high risk items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
2 years ago
True, we need to find a balance between cost and risk. Maybe a combination of both high and low risk levels is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
2 years ago
But what if the low risk items end up causing major issues later on?
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
2 years ago
I agree, focusing on high cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
2 years ago
But what about the risks with high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels? Shouldn't we address those first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
2 years ago
I agree, it's important to prioritize efficiently. High cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ronnie
2 years ago
But wouldn't it make more sense to prioritize high risk levels first, even if the cost effectiveness ratio is high?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
2 years ago
C'mon, it's gotta be the high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels! That's the whole point of prioritizing, right?
upvoted 0 times
Kayleigh
2 years ago
True, addressing high risk areas with high cost effectiveness ratios can lead to better risk management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
2 years ago
I think the priority should be on high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels to minimize impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
2 years ago
But what about low cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels? Shouldn't we address those as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
2 years ago
I agree, we should focus on high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jackie
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
2 years ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel