Isaca CRISC Exam - Topic 11 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CRISC exam

Question #: 87
Topic #: 11

[All CRISC Questions]

When classifying and prioritizing risk responses, the areas to address FIRST are those with:

Alow cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels

Bhigh cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels.

Chigh cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels

Dlow cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Glenn at Sep 16, 2024, 10:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRISC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Staci

3 months ago

Totally with you on C, high risk should be prioritized!

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

3 months ago

Wait, are we sure about C? Seems a bit off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dannette

3 months ago

C is the way to go, can't ignore high risk!

upvoted 0 times

...

India

4 months ago

I think A makes more sense, low cost is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melinda

4 months ago

Definitely C, high risk needs high cost effectiveness!

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

4 months ago

I feel like we should tackle high risk levels regardless of cost effectiveness, but I can't recall the exact details from my notes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

4 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the cost effectiveness part. Does it mean we should avoid low cost effectiveness ratios?

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

4 months ago

I remember a practice question that emphasized prioritizing high risk areas, so I’m leaning towards option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hailey

5 months ago

I think we should focus on high risk levels first, but I'm not sure if it's about cost effectiveness ratios too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irene

5 months ago

I've reviewed the concepts, and I believe the correct answer is C. The areas with the highest risk and best cost effectiveness should be addressed first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearlene

5 months ago

Okay, for this type of question, I'd focus on identifying the areas with the highest priority. That means looking for the high risk, high cost effectiveness options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawana

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the concepts of cost effectiveness ratios and risk levels to determine the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is C, high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorita

5 months ago

I remember studying price elasticity and how it affects total revenue, but I'm not completely sure how to apply it in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

1 year ago

Honestly, I'm just hoping the exam doesn't ask me to classify the risk of my exam performance. That's a whole other can of worms!

upvoted 0 times

Katina

1 year ago

B) high cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

1 year ago

C) high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels

upvoted 0 times

...

Tashia

1 year ago

A) low cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

1 year ago

Haha, these options are like a game of Risk - go big or go home, am I right? I'm voting for C, the high-stakes play!

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlette

1 year ago

I think B sounds good. If the risk is low, why waste resources on it? Let's focus on the big-ticket items first.

upvoted 0 times

Dorcas

1 year ago

True, finding the right balance is key in managing risk responses effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

1 year ago

That's a good point. Maybe we should consider a balance between low and high risk items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gussie

1 year ago

True, we need to find a balance between cost and risk. Maybe a combination of both high and low risk levels is the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Therese

1 year ago

But what if the low risk items end up causing major issues later on?

upvoted 0 times

...

Caprice

1 year ago

I agree, focusing on high cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catarina

1 year ago

But what about the risks with high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels? Shouldn't we address those first?

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

1 year ago

I agree, it's important to prioritize efficiently. High cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels make sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

1 year ago

But wouldn't it make more sense to prioritize high risk levels first, even if the cost effectiveness ratio is high?

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernell

1 year ago

C'mon, it's gotta be the high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels! That's the whole point of prioritizing, right?

upvoted 0 times

Kayleigh

1 year ago

True, addressing high risk areas with high cost effectiveness ratios can lead to better risk management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merlyn

1 year ago

I think the priority should be on high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels to minimize impact.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristine

1 year ago

But what about low cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels? Shouldn't we address those as well?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomas

1 year ago

I agree, we should focus on high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jackie

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

1 year ago

I think the answer is B.

upvoted 0 times

...