When classifying and prioritizing risk responses, the areas to address FIRST are those with:
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CRISC Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
ST
Staci
10 months ago
Totally with you on C, high risk should be prioritized!
GL
Gladys
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about C? Seems a bit off.
DA
Dannette
11 months ago
C is the way to go, can't ignore high risk!
IN
India
11 months ago
I think A makes more sense, low cost is key.
ME
Melinda
11 months ago
Definitely C, high risk needs high cost effectiveness!
RE
Reita
12 months ago
I feel like we should tackle high risk levels regardless of cost effectiveness, but I can't recall the exact details from my notes.
GL
Gladys
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the cost effectiveness part. Does it mean we should avoid low cost effectiveness ratios?
BO
Boris
12 months ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized prioritizing high risk areas, so I’m leaning towards option C.
HA
Hailey
1 year ago
I think we should focus on high risk levels first, but I'm not sure if it's about cost effectiveness ratios too.
IR
Irene
1 year ago
I've reviewed the concepts, and I believe the correct answer is C. The areas with the highest risk and best cost effectiveness should be addressed first.
PE
Pearlene
1 year ago
Okay, for this type of question, I'd focus on identifying the areas with the highest priority. That means looking for the high risk, high cost effectiveness options.
LA
Lawana
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the concepts of cost effectiveness ratios and risk levels to determine the right approach.
JA
Janey
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is C, high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels.
LO
Lorita
1 year ago
I remember studying price elasticity and how it affects total revenue, but I'm not completely sure how to apply it in this scenario.
KR
Kris
2 years ago
Honestly, I'm just hoping the exam doesn't ask me to classify the risk of my exam performance. That's a whole other can of worms!
KA
Katina
2 years ago
B) high cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels.
CH
Cherelle
2 years ago
C) high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels
TA
Tashia
2 years ago
A) low cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels
BE
Benton
2 years ago
Haha, these options are like a game of Risk - go big or go home, am I right? I'm voting for C, the high-stakes play!
CH
Charlette
2 years ago
I think B sounds good. If the risk is low, why waste resources on it? Let's focus on the big-ticket items first.
DO
Dorcas
2 years ago
True, finding the right balance is key in managing risk responses effectively.
GL
Gladys
2 years ago
That's a good point. Maybe we should consider a balance between low and high risk items.
GU
Gussie
2 years ago
True, we need to find a balance between cost and risk. Maybe a combination of both high and low risk levels is the best approach.
TH
Therese
2 years ago
But what if the low risk items end up causing major issues later on?
CA
Caprice
2 years ago
I agree, focusing on high cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels makes sense.
CA
Catarina
2 years ago
But what about the risks with high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels? Shouldn't we address those first?
PA
Pamella
2 years ago
I agree, it's important to prioritize efficiently. High cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels make sense.
RO
Ronnie
2 years ago
But wouldn't it make more sense to prioritize high risk levels first, even if the cost effectiveness ratio is high?
VE
Vernell
2 years ago
C'mon, it's gotta be the high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels! That's the whole point of prioritizing, right?
KA
Kayleigh
2 years ago
True, addressing high risk areas with high cost effectiveness ratios can lead to better risk management.
ME
Merlyn
2 years ago
I think the priority should be on high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels to minimize impact.
KR
Kristine
2 years ago
But what about low cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels? Shouldn't we address those as well?
TO
Tomas
2 years ago
I agree, we should focus on high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels first.
JA
Jackie
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
RO
Ronnie
2 years ago
I think the answer is B.