A recent internal risk review reveals the majority of core IT application recovery time objectives (RTOs) have exceeded the maximum time defined by the business application owners. Which of the following is MOST likely to change as a result?
I feel like risk likelihood might not change directly, but it could be influenced by the other factors. I’m leaning towards risk tolerance being the most likely change.
I’m not entirely sure, but I think risk appetite could change too. If the applications aren’t meeting the RTOs, they might be willing to accept more risk to improve recovery times.
I remember discussing how RTOs relate to risk tolerance in our last class. If the RTOs are exceeded, it seems like the business might adjust their risk tolerance.
This question feels familiar; I think we had a practice question about RTOs and their impact on risk forecasting. But I’m not confident about which option is the best fit here.
I'm a bit confused by this question. There are a lot of technical terms and features mentioned, and I'm not sure I fully understand how they all relate to HyperFlex. I'll have to guess and hope I get at least one right.
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through what information is typically available in a credit check inquiry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Nicolette
4 months agoAlaine
4 months agoArthur
4 months agoBrandon
4 months agoCharlesetta
5 months agoElvera
5 months agoTimothy
5 months agoTawna
5 months agoDavida
5 months agoAmie
5 months agoJamey
5 months ago