Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CRISC Exam - Topic 1 Question 79 Discussion

Posted by Myra on Jul 10, 2024 at 07:19 AM

Which of the following elements of a risk register is MOST likely to change as a result of change in management's risk appetite?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium CRISC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
RE
Reed 10 months ago
Not so sure about that, seems like inherent risk could shift too.
RO
Rochell 11 months ago
Totally agree, KRI thresholds are the most flexible.
RI
Ria 11 months ago
Surprised that people think KRI is the main one!
HU
Hubert 11 months ago
I think it's more about risk likelihood and impact.
AL
Alyce 11 months ago
KRI thresholds definitely change with risk appetite.
LE
Leonor 12 months ago
Risk velocity sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it really shifts with management's appetite. I guess it could be related?
BR
Brynn 12 months ago
I feel like inherent risk is more about the nature of the risk itself, so it probably wouldn't change with appetite.
VA
Valentin 12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about risk likelihood and impact, and it seems like that could also be affected by how management views risk.
MI
Mireya 1 year ago
I think the KRI thresholds might change with management's risk appetite, but I'm not entirely sure.
LA
Lai 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. If management's risk appetite changes, the key risk indicator thresholds would likely need to be adjusted to reflect the new appetite. That's the element that's most directly tied to risk appetite.
LA
Laticia 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know risk appetite is important, but I'm not sure which specific element it would most likely impact. I'll have to review my notes on risk registers.
AL
Allene 1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about how changes in risk appetite could impact the different elements of the risk register.
NI
Nikita 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. The key risk indicator thresholds are the most sensitive to changes in risk appetite, since they define the boundaries of what's considered acceptable risk. The other elements are more static in comparison.
TY
Tyisha 1 year ago
I've got this! The key is to focus on the 10% thresholds for both revenue and assets. Let me work through the numbers and identify the reportable segments.
JO
Joye 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm a bit confused about the difference between the running, saved, and editing configuration versions. I'll need to review my notes on configuration management to make sure I understand the implications of the save-config command.
PE
Penney 1 year ago
Hmm, let's see... the element most likely to change is the one that's the most fun to play with, like a risk yo-yo. My money's on 'Risk velocity' - because who doesn't love a good old-fashioned game of 'How Fast Can We Spin This Risk?'
DO
Donette 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is 'All of the above' - because management's risk appetite changes as often as the weather, and we're expected to keep up with it like professional weather forecasters!
MY
Myrtie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Donette
Agreed, staying on top of changes in risk appetite is crucial for effective risk management.
YO
Yolande 1 year ago
↳ replying to Donette
Yes, it's important to regularly review and update the risk register to reflect any changes in management's risk appetite.
FA
Fannie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Donette
I think you're right, management's risk appetite can definitely impact all elements of the risk register.
MI
Miss 1 year ago
A. Key risk indicator (KRI) thresholds are the most likely to change, as they are designed to align with the organization's risk appetite. If the appetite changes, the KRI thresholds will need to be adjusted accordingly.
CO
Cordelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Miss
Adjusting KRI thresholds ensures that risks are being monitored effectively.
TE
Tesha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Miss
It's important to regularly review and update them to reflect the current appetite.
OZ
Ozell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Miss
KRI thresholds are definitely impacted by changes in risk appetite.
NO
Noel 1 year ago
B. Inherent risk is the most likely to change, as it reflects the level of risk before any controls or mitigations are in place. Management's risk appetite can significantly impact the inherent risk assessment.
LO
Lou 1 year ago
↳ replying to Noel
Management's risk appetite can impact the inherent risk assessment.
DE
Detra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Noel
It reflects the level of risk before any controls are in place.
CH
Cherelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Noel
Inherent risk is the most likely to change.
FR
Frederic 1 year ago
D. Risk velocity is the most likely to change as a result of changes in management's risk appetite. The speed at which risks can materialize is closely tied to the organization's willingness to accept certain levels of risk.
MA
Mammie 1 year ago
I think the answer is C. Risk likelihood and impact are directly tied to the organization's risk appetite, which can change over time based on management's priorities.
SI
Silva 1 year ago
But what about the Key risk indicator (KRI) thresholds? Wouldn't those also change based on management's risk appetite?
AL
Alton 2 years ago
I agree with Nida, because management's risk appetite would affect how they perceive the likelihood and impact of risks.
NI
Nida 2 years ago
I think the risk likelihood and impact would change.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel