In an organization where each division manages risk independently, which of the following would BEST enable management of risk at the enterprise level?
Ah, the age-old question of 'which risk management solution is the best?' It's like trying to pick the perfect flavor of ice cream - they're all delicious in their own way!
An updated risk tolerance metric? Really? I feel like that's just putting a band-aid on the problem. We need a more comprehensive approach to enterprise-wide risk management.
I disagree, a list of control deficiencies would be a great starting point. That way, we can address the gaps in our risk management processes before worrying about policies and metrics.
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. A standardized risk taxonomy seems like it would be a more practical solution to enable consistent risk identification and assessment across the divisions.
I'm not sure about that. I think C) An enterprise risk ownership policy could also be a good option to ensure accountability for managing risk across the organization.
I think an enterprise risk ownership policy would be the best option to manage risk at the enterprise level. This would clearly define roles and responsibilities for risk management across the organization.
I agree with Ethan. Having a standardized risk taxonomy would help manage risk at the enterprise level by providing a common language for all divisions.
Buck
2 days agoRaina
5 days agoLeonardo
7 days agoAlva
9 days agoChana
1 months agoPatria
1 months agoTayna
1 months agoEthan
1 months ago