A risk practitioner has established that a particular control is working as desired, but the annual cost of maintenance has increased and now exceeds the expected annual loss exposure. The result is that the control is:
I think I saw a similar question where we had to determine if a control was optimized or not. If the costs are too high, it seems like it could be inefficient.
I feel pretty confident about this. The key information is that the control is working as desired, but the cost is too high. That means it's inefficient, so I'll select option D.
This is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the difference between "mature" and "optimized" in this context. I'll need to think it through carefully.
Okay, I think I've got this. If the control is working as desired but the cost exceeds the expected loss, then it must be inefficient. I'll go with option D.
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. I'll need to review the concepts of control effectiveness and efficiency to make sure I understand the difference between the options.
This seems like a straightforward question about the effectiveness of a control. I'll need to carefully consider the cost of maintenance versus the expected loss exposure to determine the correct answer.
Wait, I'm a little confused. Aren't all of these valid ways to find the sensor version? I'm not sure which one would be considered "not a way" to do it. I'll have to re-read the question carefully.
Ah, this is a good one! I remember learning about the different printing commands in my Linux class. I believe the correct answer is A. lpd. That's the legacy program for managing the printer queue from the command line.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between IKEv1 and IKEv2 here. I'll need to review my notes on those protocols to make sure I understand the implications.
Okay, the two features that likely led to this decision are the embedded cryptoprocessor and the hardware-backed public key storage. Those would provide a secure hardware-based approach to authentication and encryption for remote access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Emily
3 months agoLisbeth
3 months agoStefania
3 months agoJolene
4 months agoMitsue
4 months agoLavera
4 months agoStephen
4 months agoDaren
4 months agoDahlia
5 months agoTherese
5 months agoRyan
5 months agoGeorgene
5 months agoSuzi
5 months agoLezlie
5 months agoNathalie
5 months agoGeorgeanna
5 months agoRodolfo
5 months agoBobbye
5 months agoChana
5 months ago