New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca COBIT-2019 Exam - Topic 5 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT-2019 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 5
[All COBIT-2019 Questions]

What is the FINAL step in governance system design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

According to the official COBIT 2019 Study Manual from ISACA, the final step in governance system design is to define target capability levels for the most critical objectives. This process involves assessing the current capability level of the organization and setting measurable goals for improvement. Once the capability levels are defined, the organization can develop an action plan to achieve these goals.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Isaiah
3 months ago
Reviewing governance objectives is crucial too, though!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure that's the final step? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
4 months ago
Totally agree with Galen on this one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
4 months ago
Nah, it's all about defining target capability levels!
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
4 months ago
I think it's definitely about refining the scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
I have a vague memory of reconciling conflicts being a final step, but I could be mixing it up with earlier stages in the design process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like refining the scope is crucial, but it might not be the very last step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
5 months ago
I remember something about reviewing governance objectives being important, but I can't recall if that's the final step or just part of the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
5 months ago
I think the final step might be about defining target capability levels, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the last thing we do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The final step should be the one that ties everything together and ensures the governance system is complete. I'm leaning towards option C - defining the target capability levels for the most critical objectives. That seems like a logical final step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. The options all seem related to the final steps, but I'm not confident which one is the absolute final step. I might have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
5 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the final step in governance system design is reconciling any inherent priority conflicts, so I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
5 months ago
I feel like I've covered this material before, but I'm drawing a blank right now. I'll have to carefully read through the options again and try to remember the sequence of steps in governance system design. Wish me luck!
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The theory of constraints is all about identifying and managing the key constraint in the system, not trying to optimize everything at once. I'll go with C and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
5 months ago
Based on my understanding, TDE is the feature that encrypts the data in the data warehouse at rest, so I'm going to go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the main focus of financial statement audits. I'll review the key audit objectives and think through which one best matches the description.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel