The identification and definition of EGIT continual improvement success metrics is recommended and completed when:
According to the official COBIT 2019 Study Manual from ISACA, the identification and definition of EGIT continual improvement success metrics should be completed when developing the EGIT implementation program plan. This involves defining measurable goals that can be used to measure the success of the improvement program, such as cost savings, increased efficiency, and improved customer satisfaction.
Who is responsible for performing a stakeholder satisfaction survey and gathering feedback on lessons learned from the implementation of an EGIT program plan?
According to the Official COBIT 2019 Study Manual from Isaca, the CIO and the program steering committee are responsible for performing a stakeholder satisfaction survey and gathering feedback on lessons learned from the implementation of an EGIT program plan. This includes gathering and evaluating information from the stakeholders, as well as assessing program objectives and performance and making any necessary adjustments to ensure that the program is successful.
The CIO is responsible for ensuring that the implementation of the program aligns with the overall IT strategy and that the program is effective in delivering the desired results. The program steering committee is responsible for providing oversight and guidance for the implementation of the program.
Which of the following is a strategy archetype focused on increasing revenues?
The strategy archetype focused on increasing revenues is 'Growth/Acquisition' as defined by COBIT 2019. This strategy archetype is characterized by expanding the enterprise's market share and revenue base through mergers and acquisitions, organic growth and business diversification. The focus is on growth, revenue and market share and the success of this archetype is measured by the enterprise's ability to achieve these objectives.
Which of the following is the PRIMARY benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes?
The primary benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes is the identification of process improvement opportunities, according to the official COBIT 2019 Study Manual from ISACA. This gap analysis can help to identify areas where processes are not meeting their desired capability levels and can provide insight into how processes can be improved to meet their desired levels. This can help to increase efficiency and reduce costs.
When tailoring COBIT 2019 to enterprise requirements, which of the following is the PRIMARY objective of preparing a risk profile?
According to Isaca COBIT 2019, the primary objective of preparing a risk profile is to identify areas of risk that exceed the risk appetite of the enterprise. This involves assessing the potential risks that the enterprise is exposed to, and determining if these risks exceed the level of risk that the enterprise is willing to accept. This helps the enterprise understand and prioritize the areas of risk that need to be addressed, and helps to ensure that appropriate measures are taken to mitigate these risks.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!