MENU
An enterprise is not having success implementing IT governance because key staff are not participating in planning meetings. What is the MOST likely underlying cause?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium COBIT-2019 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The primary benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes is the identification of process improvement opportunities, according to the official COBIT 2019 Study Manual from ISACA. This gap analysis can help to identify areas where processes are not meeting their desired capability levels and can provide insight into how processes can be improved to meet their desired levels. This can help to increase efficiency and reduce costs.
28 comments · newest first
ME
Merlyn
10 months ago
I doubt it's just one cause; it's probably a mix of all three.
SH
Sheridan
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not just a communication problem?
AS
Ashton
11 months ago
B seems off, program management isn't the main issue here.
EM
Emily
11 months ago
I think it's A. If there were real consequences, they'd show up.
DE
Desirae
11 months ago
Definitely C, without leadership support, nothing gets done.
LO
Long
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the options, but I think if key staff aren’t attending, it could definitely be a sign of a deeper issue with leadership support.
RE
Reynalda
12 months ago
I feel like program management principles might play a role too, but I’m leaning towards the idea that if leadership isn’t committed, nothing else matters.
GL
Glen
12 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think the lack of consequences for not attending could be a big factor. We practiced a question like this where accountability was key.
TR
Tracey
1 year ago
I remember discussing how senior leadership commitment is crucial for IT governance. If they’re not engaged, it makes sense that others wouldn’t be either.
PA
Pamella
1 year ago
Ah, this is a classic IT governance issue. Based on my experience, I'd say the lack of senior leadership commitment is probably the biggest factor here. I'll select that option and move on.
CA
Catalina
1 year ago
Okay, this is a good question to test our understanding of IT governance best practices. I'm going to carefully consider each answer choice and try to determine the most likely root cause.
SO
Sommer
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure what the "most likely" underlying cause is, but I'll try to think through the options carefully.
EL
Elli
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about IT governance. I'll focus on identifying the key factors that could be causing the lack of participation.
CH
Chauncey
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Arista switch configuration. I'll need to review the default settings for the show tech support command.
KI
Kindra
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between options B and C. I know we need to represent the circle data, but I'm not sure if a cluster or a type definition would be better. I'll have to think it through carefully.
AD
Adelina
1 year ago
I'd have to go with C. If the leadership can't be bothered to show up, how can you expect the rest of the team to care? It's like trying to herd cats without a catnip supply.
DE
Denise
1 year ago
C) Lack of senior leadership commitment
EU
Eugene
1 year ago
B) Failure to utilize program management principles
CO
Cornell
1 year ago
A) Lack of consequences for not attending
CA
Carlota
1 year ago
Ooh, tough one! I'm torn between B and C, but I think the lack of senior leadership commitment is the real culprit. Can't have IT governance without the big shots on board.
WH
Whitney
1 year ago
Maybe they need to see the value in IT governance to fully commit to it. It's all about buy-in from the top down.
CH
Chun
1 year ago
Yeah, the top brass sets the tone for the whole organization. If they're not on board, it's an uphill battle.
RE
Rebecka
1 year ago
I agree, without senior leadership commitment, it's hard to get everyone else on board.
CH
Cherelle
1 year ago
I'm going with option C. No commitment from the top means no one else will take it seriously. Kinda like a fish rotting from the head, you know?
SH
Shawna
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say the lack of senior leadership commitment is the most likely cause. If the big bosses don't show up, why would the key staff bother?
SA
Salley
1 year ago
Maybe there should be consequences for not attending to ensure participation.
GA
Gail
2 years ago
I agree with Barbra. Without senior leadership support, it's hard to get key staff involved.
BA
Barbra
2 years ago
I think the underlying cause is lack of senior leadership commitment.