Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Isaca COBIT-2019 Exam - Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion

An enterprise is not having success implementing IT governance because key staff are not participating in planning meetings. What is the MOST likely underlying cause?
B) Failure to utilize program management principles
A) Lack of consequences for not attending
C) Lack of senior leadership commitment

Isaca COBIT-2019 Exam - Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT-2019 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 1
[All COBIT-2019 Questions]

An enterprise is not having success implementing IT governance because key staff are not participating in planning meetings. What is the MOST likely underlying cause?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The primary benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes is the identification of process improvement opportunities, according to the official COBIT 2019 Study Manual from ISACA. This gap analysis can help to identify areas where processes are not meeting their desired capability levels and can provide insight into how processes can be improved to meet their desired levels. This can help to increase efficiency and reduce costs.


by Jean at Jun 24, 2024, 04:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium COBIT-2019 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Merlyn
7 months ago
I doubt it's just one cause; it's probably a mix of all three.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not just a communication problem?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
8 months ago
B seems off, program management isn't the main issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
8 months ago
I think it's A. If there were real consequences, they'd show up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
8 months ago
Definitely C, without leadership support, nothing gets done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the options, but I think if key staff aren’t attending, it could definitely be a sign of a deeper issue with leadership support.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
9 months ago
I feel like program management principles might play a role too, but I’m leaning towards the idea that if leadership isn’t committed, nothing else matters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
9 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think the lack of consequences for not attending could be a big factor. We practiced a question like this where accountability was key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
9 months ago
I remember discussing how senior leadership commitment is crucial for IT governance. If they’re not engaged, it makes sense that others wouldn’t be either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
9 months ago
Ah, this is a classic IT governance issue. Based on my experience, I'd say the lack of senior leadership commitment is probably the biggest factor here. I'll select that option and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
9 months ago
Okay, this is a good question to test our understanding of IT governance best practices. I'm going to carefully consider each answer choice and try to determine the most likely root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
9 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure what the "most likely" underlying cause is, but I'll try to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about IT governance. I'll focus on identifying the key factors that could be causing the lack of participation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Arista switch configuration. I'll need to review the default settings for the show tech support command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between options B and C. I know we need to represent the circle data, but I'm not sure if a cluster or a type definition would be better. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
1 year ago
I'd have to go with C. If the leadership can't be bothered to show up, how can you expect the rest of the team to care? It's like trying to herd cats without a catnip supply.
upvoted 0 times
Denise
1 year ago
C) Lack of senior leadership commitment
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
1 year ago
B) Failure to utilize program management principles
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
1 year ago
A) Lack of consequences for not attending
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlota
1 year ago
Ooh, tough one! I'm torn between B and C, but I think the lack of senior leadership commitment is the real culprit. Can't have IT governance without the big shots on board.
upvoted 0 times
Whitney
1 year ago
Maybe they need to see the value in IT governance to fully commit to it. It's all about buy-in from the top down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
1 year ago
Yeah, the top brass sets the tone for the whole organization. If they're not on board, it's an uphill battle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
1 year ago
I agree, without senior leadership commitment, it's hard to get everyone else on board.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherelle
1 year ago
I'm going with option C. No commitment from the top means no one else will take it seriously. Kinda like a fish rotting from the head, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say the lack of senior leadership commitment is the most likely cause. If the big bosses don't show up, why would the key staff bother?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
1 year ago
Maybe there should be consequences for not attending to ensure participation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 year ago
I agree with Barbra. Without senior leadership support, it's hard to get key staff involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 year ago
I think the underlying cause is lack of senior leadership commitment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel