Isaca CGEIT Exam - Topic 12 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CGEIT exam

Question #: 88
Topic #: 12

An IT steering committee wants to select a disaster recovery site based on available risk data Which of the following would BE ST enable the mapping of cost to risk?

AKey risk indicators (KRIs)

BScenario-based assessment

CBusiness impact analysis (BIA)

DQualitative forecasting

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Vanda at Sep 17, 2024, 11:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CGEIT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Yuette

6 months ago

Qualitative forecasting seems too vague for this purpose.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmen

6 months ago

Wait, can KRIs really map costs to risks? Not so sure about that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

6 months ago

Scenario-based assessments can also provide valuable insights.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

7 months ago

Totally agree, BIA helps link costs to risks effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tracey

7 months ago

I think Business Impact Analysis (BIA) is key here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janella

7 months ago

Qualitative forecasting seems a bit vague for this question; I feel like it wouldn't provide the concrete mapping needed for costs and risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregoria

7 months ago

I practiced a similar question where BIA was the answer, and it makes sense since it evaluates the financial impact of disruptions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonna

7 months ago

I think scenario-based assessments might help in understanding potential costs, but I feel like BIA is more focused on impacts rather than direct cost mapping.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannan

8 months ago

I remember studying KRIs, but I'm not entirely sure how they directly map costs to risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronald

8 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'm not super familiar with all of these risk assessment methods, so I'll need to rely on my understanding of the question to guide me towards the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caren

8 months ago

Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll eliminate the options that don't seem directly relevant to mapping cost to risk, then evaluate the remaining ones to select the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delila

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Mapping cost to risk could be done in different ways, so I'll need to think through each of these options carefully to determine the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

8 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about mapping cost to risk. I think the key is to focus on the methods that would best enable that, so I'll carefully consider the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chan

8 months ago

I remember discussing per occurrence deductibles in class, but I'm not sure if the $2 million figure directly relates to the calculations we did.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

1 year ago

Scenario-based assessment? Sounds like a disaster recovery plan for a disaster movie!

upvoted 0 times

Silva

12 months ago

C: Key risk indicators could also be useful in understanding the potential impact of different risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerry

12 months ago

B: I agree, it would help us plan for different disaster scenarios.

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

1 year ago

A: I think scenario-based assessment would be the best option for mapping cost to risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alise

1 year ago

Key risk indicators? More like 'key to raising my risk of failing this exam!'

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

1 year ago

I'm not sure qualitative forecasting is the best fit for this task. It seems a bit too subjective for mapping cost to risk.

upvoted 0 times

Lezlie

11 months ago

A) Key risk indicators (KRIs) would be a more reliable option for mapping cost to risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

11 months ago

I agree, qualitative forecasting may not provide the objective data needed for this decision.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shoshana

11 months ago

C) Business impact analysis (BIA)

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

12 months ago

B) Scenario-based assessment

upvoted 0 times

...

Mattie

1 year ago

A) Key risk indicators (KRIs)

upvoted 0 times

...

Linwood

1 year ago

Business impact analysis could also be a good option, but it may not provide the same level of cost-to-risk mapping as scenario-based assessment.

upvoted 0 times

Glory

1 year ago

B) Scenario-based assessment

upvoted 0 times

...

Fatima

1 year ago

A) Key risk indicators (KRIs)

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

1 year ago

I'm not sure about KRIs. I think the answer might be C) Business impact analysis (BIA) as it helps in understanding the impact of risks on the business.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gabriele

1 year ago

I agree with Kristal. KRIs provide a quantitative measure of risk, which can be used to map cost effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Royce

1 year ago

Scenario-based assessment seems like the logical choice here. It allows for a detailed analysis of potential risks and their financial impact.

upvoted 0 times

Arthur

1 year ago

D: Qualitative forecasting might not be as effective in this situation compared to scenario-based assessment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jade

1 year ago

C: Key risk indicators (KRIs) could also be helpful in identifying and measuring risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaniqua

1 year ago

B: I agree, it provides a more in-depth look at potential risks and their financial implications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyla

1 year ago

A: I think scenario-based assessment would be the best option for mapping cost to risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristal

1 year ago

I think the answer is A) Key risk indicators (KRIs). It helps in mapping cost to risk.

upvoted 0 times

...