Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CDPSE Exam - Topic 3 Question 28 Discussion

Posted by Valentine on Jul 29, 2023 at 01:48 PM

When using anonymization techniques to prevent unauthorized access to personal data, which of the following is the MOST important consideration to ensure the data is adequately protected?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium CDPSE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
YA
Yasuko 11 months ago
Agreed, A is key! Can't risk the key being too accessible.
TE
Terina 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure D is enough? DLP isn't foolproof.
WI
Willard 11 months ago
C seems a bit basic, I don't see how that helps much.
GE
Georgiann 11 months ago
I think B is crucial too, multi-factor adds extra security.
AD
Adaline 12 months ago
A is definitely the most important! Keep that key safe!
DU
Dulce 12 months ago
I vaguely recall that the key's complexity matters, but I don't think just having a complex key is enough to ensure data protection overall.
ST
Stevie 12 months ago
Multi-factor authentication sounds like a good layer of security, but I feel like it might not directly relate to anonymization techniques.
EV
Evangelina 1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about DLP technology, and it seemed like a strong option for protecting data, but I wonder if it's the best choice here.
BR
Brynn 1 year ago
I think the key being separate from the data is really important, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the most crucial factor.
CH
Chanel 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky BGP question. I'll need to carefully consider the implications of the "as-override" command and how that affects the path of the prefix.
DE
Derrick 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this. I know OSPF has a priority setting for electing the DR, but I can't remember the exact default value off the top of my head. I'll have to think this through carefully.
LO
Louis 1 year ago
Option C? Really? Since when do we care about the specific characters in the key for anonymization? Seems like a bit of a red herring.
RE
Reita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Louis
B) Multi-factor authentication adds an extra layer of security to prevent unauthorized access.
BR
Britt 1 year ago
↳ replying to Louis
A) I agree, keeping the key separate is crucial for protecting the data.
TU
Tu 1 year ago
↳ replying to Louis
D) The data must be stored in locations protected by data loss prevention (DLP) technology.
TR
Tracey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Louis
A) The key must be kept separate and distinct from the data it protects.
JA
James 1 year ago
I'm going to have to go with Option A. Keeping the key separate from the data is just common sense for proper data protection.
AL
Alisha 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about Option B. Wouldn't multi-factor authentication be more for user access control rather than data anonymization specifically?
DA
Dalene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alisha
A) The key must be kept separate and distinct from the data it protects.
LY
Lyda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alisha
B) I think you're right. Multi-factor authentication is more for user access control.
HE
Heidy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alisha
A) The key must be kept separate and distinct from the data it protects.
NO
Novella 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Protecting the data storage locations with DLP technology seems like a pretty critical step.
VE
Vernice 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
D) The data must be stored in locations protected by data loss prevention (DLP) technology.
CH
Charlena 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
C) The key must be a combination of alpha and numeric characters.
VE
Veronika 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
B) The data must be protected by multi-factor authentication.
DO
Donte 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
A) The key must be kept separate and distinct from the data it protects.
CH
Cherilyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
D) The data must be stored in locations protected by data loss prevention (DLP) technology.
EI
Eileen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
C) The key must be a combination of alpha and numeric characters.
VA
Van 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
B) The data must be protected by multi-factor authentication.
LE
Lemuel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
A) The key must be kept separate and distinct from the data it protects.
MU
Muriel 2 years ago
I see your point. But I also think D) The data must be stored in locations protected by data loss prevention technology is important to prevent unauthorized access.
CH
Charlette 2 years ago
Option A seems reasonable, but I wonder if that's really the MOST important consideration. Shouldn't the key also be strong and secure?
BO
Bok 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlette
User 2: Option A seems reasonable, but I wonder if that's really the MOST important consideration. Shouldn't the key also be strong and secure?
LI
Lino 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlette
User 4: D) The data must be stored in locations protected by data loss prevention (DLP) technology.
PA
Paulene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlette
User 1: A) The key must be kept separate and distinct from the data it protects.
EV
Evangelina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlette
User 3: A) The key must be kept separate and distinct from the data it protects.
JO
Josphine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlette
User 2: B) The data must be protected by multi-factor authentication.
MA
Maurine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlette
User 1: A) The key must be kept separate and distinct from the data it protects.
LE
Leah 2 years ago
I agree with Rutha. If the key is compromised, the data is at risk. So, A) is crucial for protecting personal data.
RU
Rutha 2 years ago
I think the most important consideration is A) The key must be kept separate and distinct from the data it protects.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel