Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI SPHR Exam - Topic 7 Question 50 Discussion

Posted by Thurman on Sep 16, 2022 at 10:33 PM

A manager always requires a female member of the project team to take the meeting minutes. This is an example of what type of discrimination?

Suggested Answer: A

Answer option A is correct.

Harris v. Forklift Systems Inc. was referenced in the case of same-sex harassment brought to the Supreme Court in Oncale v. Sundowner (D). Oncalehelped determine that gender is of little consequence when harassment meets the statutory requirements defined in Harris. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (B) and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth (C) were also important cases aiding in interpreting the concept of sexual harassment in the workplace.

Chapter: Employee and Labor Relations

Objective: Review Questions


Get Premium SPHR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
43 comments · newest first
RO
Rosamond 11 months ago
This is a classic example of gender bias in the workplace.
AL
Alisha 11 months ago
It's so unfair to assume only women can take minutes!
LE
Lenora 12 months ago
Wait, is this really a form of discrimination?
BL
Blair 12 months ago
I disagree, it seems more like adverse impact to me.
LE
Leonora 12 months ago
That's definitely disparate treatment.
LA
Lang 1 year ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I think it was about disparate treatment too. It’s when someone is treated differently based on their gender, right?
FL
Florinda 1 year ago
This feels like it could relate to sexual harassment, but I guess it’s more about the unequal treatment in this case.
NA
Nadine 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about disparate impact being related to policies that affect one group more than another.
CH
Cherry 1 year ago
I think this might be an example of disparate treatment since the manager is specifically requiring a female to take minutes.
AD
Adolph 1 year ago
Ah, this is an easy one! The term used for the beginning of time for UNIX is "Epoch". It's a common concept in computer science, where time is measured from a specific starting point. I've got this question in the bag.
KI
Kirk 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the approval of PEPs by someone other than the relationship manager is essential, but I'm not confident about the specific requirements.
DA
Danica 1 year ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully review the IRS regulations on international boycotts to determine if the bank's actions constitute participation or cooperation.
RO
Rodrigo 1 year ago
Option B is the correct answer. Singling out a team member for a task solely because of their gender is textbook disparate treatment.
EL
Elbert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rodrigo
A: That's right, it's discrimination.
CO
Corrie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rodrigo
B: Yeah, it's definitely unfair to choose someone based on their gender.
TU
Tula 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rodrigo
A: I think the answer is B) Disparate treatment.
PE
Peggy 1 year ago
Haha, I bet the manager thinks he's being 'chivalrous' by making the woman take notes. What a dinosaur!
MA
Mattie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Peggy
C) Sexual harassment
AN
Angelica 1 year ago
↳ replying to Peggy
B) Disparate treatment
QU
Queenie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Peggy
A) Disparate impact
RE
Reid 1 year ago
Definitely disparate treatment. Basing job assignments on gender and not qualifications is unacceptable.
BE
Bev 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
Exactly, it's discrimination based on gender.
CH
Chaya 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
B) Disparate treatment
CA
Cammy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
No, it's not disparate impact. It's about treating people differently based on gender.
CH
Charlene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
A) Disparate impact
VE
Veronique 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
I agree, it's definitely disparate treatment.
YO
Yong 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
B) Disparate treatment
GR
Grover 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
I don't think it's sexual harassment, but more about unequal treatment based on gender.
LA
Layla 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
C) Sexual harassment
DE
Denise 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
Yes, it's definitely a form of discrimination based on gender.
LE
Lettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
B) Disparate treatment
AL
Alishia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
I think it could also be considered disparate impact, since it affects a specific group disproportionately.
ER
Erasmo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
A) Disparate impact
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
I agree, it's definitely unfair to assign tasks based on gender.
MA
Marylin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reid
B) Disparate treatment
GI
Gianna 1 year ago
I think it could also be considered sexual harassment, since it's based on gender.
SI
Simona 2 years ago
I agree with Shawnna, it's definitely disparate treatment.
TE
Tegan 2 years ago
This is clearly a case of disparate treatment. Requiring a female team member to take minutes just based on their gender is discrimination.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
The manager should be assigning tasks based on skills and qualifications, not gender.
LA
Laura 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
It's important to treat everyone on the team equally and not make assumptions about their capabilities.
FR
Frederica 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
I agree, it's not right to assume someone's abilities based on their gender.
KR
Kris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
That's definitely disparate treatment. It's unfair to single out a female team member for that task.
SH
Shawnna 2 years ago
B) Disparate treatment
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel