New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI SPHR Exam - Topic 2 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's SPHR exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 2
[All SPHR Questions]

Federal legislation does not specifically prohibit disparate treatment of caregivers, but claims of disparate treatment for employees caring for elders, children, or disabled family members increased 450 percent between 1990 and 2005. On what basis are these claims filed?

Each correct answer represents a complete solution. Choose all that apply.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Answer option A is correct.

Chapter: Risk Management

Objective: Risk Management


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Shizue
3 months ago
450% increase? That's wild!
upvoted 0 times
...
James
3 months ago
Title VII could apply too, especially with discrimination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
3 months ago
Wait, I thought the ADA was more relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
4 months ago
Totally agree, FMLA is key for caregivers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
4 months ago
Claims are often filed under the Family Medical Leave Act.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
4 months ago
The Davis-Bacon Act doesn't seem to fit at all. I can't recall it being mentioned in relation to caregiver claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
4 months ago
I think Title VII could also be a possibility since it deals with discrimination, but I’m not confident if it directly relates to caregiver status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about the Americans with Disabilities Act being relevant here. It feels like it might apply, but I need to think more about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the Family Medical Leave Act in class, and it seems like a strong candidate for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which laws would apply here, but I'll start by carefully analyzing the question and the answer choices to see if I can identify the most relevant options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The Family Medical Leave Act is designed to protect employees who need to take time off to care for family members, so that seems like a clear choice. The Americans with Disabilities Act and Title VII also seem relevant for claims of discrimination against caregivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused. The question mentions "disparate treatment of caregivers," but none of the answer choices seem to directly address that. I'll need to re-read the question and think about how the different laws might apply.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify the laws that prohibit discrimination against caregivers. The Americans with Disabilities Act and Title VII seem like the most relevant options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully review the details and think through the different laws that could apply.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
10 months ago
Hold up, the Dvis-Bacon Act? Is that like the lesser-known cousin of the Davis-Bacon Act? *laughs* Definitely going with Title VII and FMLA on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Fernanda
8 months ago
I agree, Title VII and FMLA are the most relevant laws in this situation. They address the issue of disparate treatment for caregivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
9 months ago
Title VII and FMLA are the way to go for sure. They provide protection against disparate treatment for caregivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
9 months ago
Yeah, the Dvis-Bacon Act is definitely not one of the options. I'm going with Title VII and FMLA too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimberely
10 months ago
Ah, the joys of employment law. At least it's not the tax code, am I right? *chuckles* But seriously, Title VII and FMLA are the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
10 months ago
The Dvis-Bacon Act? Really? I think someone needs to go back and review their labor law knowledge. This is clearly a Title VII or FMLA issue.
upvoted 0 times
Ngoc
9 months ago
D) Title VII
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
9 months ago
B) Family Medical Leave Act
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
10 months ago
A) Americans with Disabilities Act
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalya
10 months ago
I'm not so sure - the Family Medical Leave Act could also be applicable, since it provides job protection for employees caring for family members. Definitely a tricky one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
10 months ago
Title VII seems like the obvious choice here, since it prohibits discrimination based on protected characteristics like family status. The other options don't seem relevant to this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Hui
9 months ago
D) Title VII
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
9 months ago
B) Family Medical Leave Act
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
9 months ago
A) Americans with Disabilities Act
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissa
11 months ago
I believe the Family Medical Leave Act also plays a role in these claims, as it provides job-protected leave for caregivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
11 months ago
I agree with Leonora, Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sex, race, color, national origin, and religion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
11 months ago
I think the claims are filed based on Title VII.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel