HRCI PHR Exam - Topic 9 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's PHR exam

Question #: 79
Topic #: 9

Your organization has 80 full-time employees. Management has recently informed you that they have sold their business and they'll be releasing all employees in the organization. Based on the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988, how many days must management give in writing to the employees of this organization before the mass layoff?

A60 days

B120 days

CZero days

D30 days

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

Quid pro quo happens when the acceptance or decline of an unwanted sexual advance leads to a hiring, employment, or workplace decision.

Because Sammy refused the dinner date, Pat didn't hire Sammy.

Answer option A is incorrect. Covert is not a valid sexual harassment term.

Answer option C is incorrect. Contingent is not a valid sexual harassment term.

Answer option D is incorrect. A hostile work environment describes unwelcome sexual conduct that interferes with a person's ability to complete their work, intimidation, or an offensive work environment.

by Roosevelt at Dec 26, 2023, 05:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PHR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Nada

6 months ago

120 days seems way too long for a business sale!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherman

6 months ago

Wait, I thought it was zero days for layoffs?

upvoted 0 times

...

Pilar

6 months ago

Nope, it's actually 60 days.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olene

7 months ago

Definitely 30 days, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Stacey

7 months ago

It's 60 days under the WARN Act.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilona

7 months ago

I’m leaning towards 60 days too, but I could be mixing it up with another regulation. I wish I had reviewed this section more!

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyun

7 months ago

I’m pretty uncertain about this one. I thought the WARN Act required 90 days, but I guess that’s not an option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

7 months ago

I feel like I saw a similar question in our practice exams, and it was about 30 days. But that might have been for a different situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frankie

8 months ago

I think the answer is 60 days, but I'm not completely sure. I remember something about advance notice being required.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brunilda

8 months ago

This is a good opportunity to apply my knowledge of employment law. I'll carefully read through the details of the question and the answer choices to determine the correct response.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

8 months ago

Wait, I thought the WARN Act required 30 days' notice. But now I'm second-guessing myself. I better review the key points of the law before answering this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryan

8 months ago

Okay, let me see. The question says the organization has 80 full-time employees, and the WARN Act applies to mass layoffs. I'm pretty sure the answer is 60 days, but I should double-check the details just to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gabriele

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know the WARN Act requires advance notice, but I can't remember the exact number of days. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

8 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about the WARN Act. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marsha

8 months ago

Alright, I think I've got a good handle on this. Option B with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery seems like the most straightforward and cost-optimized solution. Replicating the database changes continuously and then just spinning up the secondary instance during a failover - that should hit all the requirements they're looking for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noel

8 months ago

I've got a good understanding of DBMS capabilities, so I feel confident I can select the best answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louis

8 months ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

1 year ago

Wait, they have to give 60 days' notice? That's like an eternity in the corporate world. I'll be polishing my resume in the meantime!

upvoted 0 times

Eve

11 months ago

I'll start updating my LinkedIn profile just in case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosamond

11 months ago

I guess it's better to have more time to prepare than less.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavera

11 months ago

I heard some companies give even more notice than that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dierdre

12 months ago

I know, 60 days is a long time to wait for the inevitable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Heidy

1 year ago

120 days? That seems excessive. I'm going to go with the 60-day option since that's the standard under the WARN Act.

upvoted 0 times

Lashawn

11 months ago

It's important for management to follow the law and provide the necessary notice to employees.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lilli

11 months ago

Yeah, 60 days gives employees enough time to prepare for the layoff.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

12 months ago

I agree, 60 days is the standard requirement under the WARN Act.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daron

1 year ago

Zero days? Come on, that can't be right. Businesses have to give employees proper notice before a mass layoff.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tequila

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm pretty sure it's 30 days. That's the standard notice period I've heard of for these types of situations.

upvoted 0 times

Hobert

11 months ago

I believe it's 60 days as well, that's what the law requires.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salley

11 months ago

No, I'm pretty sure it's 120 days.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olene

12 months ago

I think it's actually 60 days, not 30.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helaine

12 months ago

I believe it's 60 days as well, that's what the law requires.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

12 months ago

No, I'm pretty sure it's 120 days.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brent

1 year ago

I think it's actually 60 days, not 30.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keshia

1 year ago

I think the answer is 60 days. The WARN Act requires 60 days' written notice for mass layoffs like this.

upvoted 0 times

Bette

1 year ago

Actually, it's 60 days. The WARN Act specifies 60 days' written notice for mass layoffs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fletcher

1 year ago

D) 30 days

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylou

1 year ago

Yes, you are correct. The WARN Act does require 60 days' notice for mass layoffs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniela

1 year ago

A) 60 days

upvoted 0 times

...

Percy

1 year ago

Yes, management must give 60 days' written notice before a mass layoff.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

1 year ago

I agree, it's 60 days according to the WARN Act.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scarlet

1 year ago

That's right. It's to give us time to find new jobs and make arrangements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawna

1 year ago

I think they have to give us 60 days notice according to the WARN Act.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scarlet

1 year ago

I can't believe they're letting us all go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alayna

1 year ago

Yeah, that's right. It's to give us time to find new jobs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alesia

1 year ago

I think they have to give us 60 days notice according to the WARN Act.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alayna

1 year ago

I can't believe they're letting us all go.

upvoted 0 times

...