New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HRCI PHR Exam - Topic 1 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's PHR exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 1
[All PHR Questions]

Pat is interviewing Sammy for a job in his organization. During the interview, Pat asks Sammy for a dinner date. Sammy refuses his offer, but thanks him. Pat tells Sammy that a dinner date would be beneficial to the job selection. Sammy still refuses the dinner date. Based on this conversation, Pat decides not to hire Sammy for the position. This is an example of what type of sexual harassment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Quid pro quo happens when the acceptance or decline of an unwanted sexual advance leads to a hiring, employment, or workplace decision.

Because Sammy refused the dinner date, Pat didn't hire Sammy.

Answer option A is incorrect. Covert is not a valid sexual harassment term.

Answer option C is incorrect. Contingent is not a valid sexual harassment term.

Answer option D is incorrect. A hostile work environment describes unwelcome sexual conduct that interferes with a person's ability to complete their work, intimidation, or an offensive work environment.


by Rupert at Jul 02, 2024, 05:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PHR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dawne
3 months ago
This is a classic example of quid pro quo, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
3 months ago
Not sure if that's harassment, seems like a misunderstanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
3 months ago
Wait, he really thought a dinner date would help?
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
4 months ago
Totally agree, it's a clear abuse of power.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
4 months ago
That's definitely quid pro quo harassment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the answer is definitely quid pro quo since Pat is making the job offer conditional on the dinner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
This sounds like a classic case of quid pro quo, but I wonder if it could also be seen as coercive in some way?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about quid pro quo being when job benefits are tied to sexual favors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
5 months ago
I think this might be quid pro quo harassment since Pat is implying that the job depends on the dinner date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. The fact that Sammy refused the date but the interviewer still decided not to hire them makes me wonder if this could also be considered a hostile work environment. I'll have to review the definitions carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
5 months ago
Okay, let me see if I've got this right. The interviewer is using the job offer as leverage to try and get a date, even after Sammy refused. That sounds like it could be considered a form of coercion, so I'm leaning towards quid pro quo harassment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The question mentions that Sammy refused the dinner date, so I'm not sure if that would still count as quid pro quo harassment. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward to me. The interviewer is clearly trying to leverage the job offer to get a date, which is a textbook example of quid pro quo sexual harassment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
5 months ago
I think the key here is that the interviewer is directly linking the job offer to the dinner date request. Even though Sammy refused, the fact that they weren't hired afterwards suggests a quid pro quo situation. I'm pretty confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the ratio of comments to executable statements or the ratio of commands to statements. Those don't seem as directly related to the test suite being out of date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
5 months ago
For some reason, I keep thinking about vManage, but I'm pretty sure that's not related to Mobility Express. That confused me during practice—does anyone remember if it has a dedicated dashboard?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
5 months ago
This seems tricky, but I'm going to take it step-by-step. I'll make sure to show my work and explain my reasoning so I can demonstrate my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. SNMP uses a pull model, while model-driven telemetry uses a push model. I think that's one of the key differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pauline
2 years ago
It's good that Pat's behavior was recognized as inappropriate, it creates a hostile work environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
2 years ago
Sammy did the right thing by refusing the offer, it's important to stand up against such behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
2 years ago
I'd be laughing my way out of that interview if someone tried to pull that on me. Quid pro quo all the way, what a joke.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
2 years ago
Haha, Pat must be living in the dark ages if he thinks he can get away with that kind of behavior nowadays. Definitely quid pro quo.
upvoted 0 times
Leonardo
2 years ago
Sammy: I appreciate the offer, but I still have to decline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
2 years ago
Pat: A dinner date would be beneficial for the job selection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
2 years ago
Sammy: Thank you for the offer, but I have to decline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
2 years ago
Pat: Would you like to go out to dinner with me?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Miesha
2 years ago
I agree, Pat was using the dinner date as a condition for the job offer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
2 years ago
That's definitely a case of quid pro quo sexual harassment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
2 years ago
I'd say that's a clear-cut case of quid pro quo sexual harassment. Pat was trying to leverage the job offer for personal gain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
2 years ago
Asking for a dinner date in exchange for the job? That's textbook quid pro quo, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Detra
2 years ago
Sammy: I appreciate the offer, but I'm not comfortable with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
2 years ago
Pat: A dinner date would really help your chances for the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
2 years ago
Sammy: Thank you for the offer, but I have to decline.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregoria
2 years ago
Woah, Pat definitely crossed a line there. Quid pro quo harassment, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
2 years ago
Pat: Well, if you're not willing to go out with me, I don't think you're a good fit for the position.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
2 years ago
Sammy: I appreciate the offer, but I'm not interested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
2 years ago
Pat: A dinner date would be beneficial for your job prospects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
2 years ago
Sammy: Thank you, but I'll have to decline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
2 years ago
Pat: Would you like to go out to dinner with me?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel