MENU
With the Aruba CX 6200 24G switch with uplinks or 1/1/25 and 1/1/26, how do you protect client ports from forming layer-2 loops?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium HPE7-A01 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The command loop-protect enables loop protection on each layer 2 interface (port, LAG, or VLAN) for which loop protection is needed. Loop protection can find loops in untagged layer 2 links, as well as on tagged VLANs.
16 comments · newest first
EV
Evangelina
11 months ago
Not sure about that, I thought loop-guard was the standard.
TO
Tommy
11 months ago
Definitely option A for protecting those ports!
DE
Desmond
11 months ago
Wait, can you really use loop-protect on those ports?
MA
Mariann
12 months ago
I think loop-guard is better for preventing loops.
SH
Sheridan
12 months ago
Loop-protect is the way to go for client ports!
LO
Louann
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the interface range; I thought it was 1/1/1-1/1/24, but what about the uplinks?
BE
Bettyann
1 year ago
I feel like option A is the right choice since it mentions loop-protect for the correct range of interfaces.
GL
Glenna
1 year ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that loop-protect was specifically for client ports.
TW
Twanna
1 year ago
I remember studying loop protection, but I’m not sure if it’s loop-protect or loop-guard that we need to use here.
DO
Donte
1 year ago
I'm not too familiar with Aruba switches, but based on the information provided, I think the best approach would be to use the loop-protect feature on the client ports, which is option A.
RI
Rickie
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question mentions the Aruba CX 6200 switch with uplink ports 1/1/25 and 1/1/26. So the client ports would be 1/1/1 to 1/1/24. I'm pretty confident the answer is A.
RO
Roslyn
1 year ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Shouldn't we be using loop-guard instead of loop-protect? I'm not sure about the difference between the two.
GU
Gussie
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the answer is A - enabling loop-protect on the client ports.
GO
Golda
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the code. I'll need to walk through it step-by-step to understand how the different options might work.
BU
Bulah
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Eliminating single points of failure, testing failover, and having good documentation - those seem like the key things to focus on here.
BE
Bette
1 year ago
The key here is to focus on the specific question being asked. The question is asking for the command to view all tables, so I'm going with A - "show tables;".