What is one advantage of using OCSP vs CRLs for certificate validation?
OCSP is a protocol that allows clients to query the CA or a trusted responder for the status of a specific certificate.OCSP requests and responses are smaller and faster than CRLs, and they can provide real-time information about the revocation status of a certificate12. CRLs are lists of all revoked certificates that are downloaded from the CA.CRLs can present issues, as they can become outdated and have to be downloaded frequently13.Therefore, OCSP reduces latency between the time a certificate is revoked and validation reflects this status. Reference:1https://sectigostore.com/blog/ocsp-vs-crl-whats-the-difference/2https://www.keyfactor.com/blog/what-is-a-certificate-revocation-list-crl-vs-ocsp/3https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/ocsp
You are configuring an SVI on an Aruba CX switch that needs to have the following characteristics:
* VLANID = 25
. IPv4 address 10 105 43 1 with mask 255 255 255.0
* IPv6 address fd00:5708::f02d:4df6 with a 64 bit prefix length
* member of VRF eng
* VRF eng and VLAN 25 have not yet been created
Which command lists will satisfy the requirements with the least number of commands?
A)

B)

C)

D)

The other options either use more commands or do not create the VRF or the VLAN.
Option C uses the following commands:
vrf eng: This command creates a VRF named eng and enters the VRF configuration mode1.
vlan 25: This command creates a VLAN with ID 25 and enters the VLAN configuration mode2.
interface vlan 25: This command creates an SVI on VLAN 25 and enters the interface configuration mode3.
ip address 10.105.43.1/24 ipv6 address fd00:5780::102d:4df6/64 vrf attach eng: This command assigns an IPv4 address of 10.105.43.1 with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 and an IPv6 address of fd00:5780::102d:4df6 with a prefix length of 64 to the SVI, and attaches it to the VRF eng.
Two AOS-CX switches are configured with VSX at the the Access-Aggregation layer where servers attach to them An SVI interface is configured for VLAN 10 and serves as the default gateway for VLAN 10. The ISL link between the switches fails, but the keepalive interface functions. Active gateway has been configured on the VSX switches.

What is correct about access from the servers to the Core? (Select two.)
These are the correct statements about access from the servers to the Core when the ISL link between the switches fails, but the keepalive interface functions. Server 1 can access the core layer via both uplinks because it is connected to VSX-A, which is still active for VLAN 10. Server 2 can also access the core layer via its uplink to VSX-B, which is still active for VLAN 10 because of Active Gateway feature. Server 1 and Server 2 can communicate with each other via the core layer because they are in the same VLAN and subnet, and their traffic can be routed through the core switches. The other statements are incorrect because they either describe scenarios that are not possible or not relevant to the question. Reference: https://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/AOS-CX/10.04/HTML/5200-6728/bk01-
You need to ensure that voice traffic sent through an ArubaOS-CX switch arrives with minimal latency What is the best scheduling technology to use for this task?
Strict queuing is the best scheduling technology to use for voice traffic on an AOS-CX switch. Scheduling is a mechanism that determines how packets are transmitted from different queues on an egress port. Strict queuing is a scheduling method that gives the highest priority queue absolute preference over all other queues, regardless of their size or utilization. Voice traffic should be assigned to the highest priority queue and scheduled with strict queuing to ensure minimal latency and jitter. The other options are incorrect because they are either not scheduling methods or not optimal for voice traffic. Reference: https://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/AOS-CX/10.04/HTML/5200-6728/bk01-ch02.html https://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/AOS-CX/10.04/HTML/5200-6728/bk01-ch03.html
Which statements are true regarding a VXLAN Implementation on HPE Aruba Networking switches? (Select two.)
Harold Turner
6 days agoMargery
21 days agoJacquelyne
29 days agoBette
1 month agoFrancoise
1 month agoLucy
2 months agoHui
2 months agoMarquetta
2 months agoLura
2 months agoCristy
3 months agoKimberlie
3 months agoDenise
3 months agoAndrew
4 months agoWei
4 months agoOmer
4 months agoGlory
4 months agoGracia
4 months agoEliseo
5 months agoReta
5 months agoPearly
5 months agoAlease
5 months agoLisha
6 months agoYuonne
6 months agoBrandon
7 months agoHoward
7 months agoDevorah
7 months agoJames
7 months agoKaycee
8 months agoLatosha
8 months agoDeeann
10 months agoMelodie
11 months agoVeronika
1 year agoArt
1 year agoJeanice
1 year agoAdrianna
1 year agoQuiana
1 year agoLatricia
1 year agoLatrice
1 year agoYolando
1 year agoMarion
1 year agoGayla
1 year agoShelton
1 year agoMariann
1 year agoMariann
1 year agoVannessa
1 year agoGoldie
1 year agoGeraldo
1 year agoKassandra
1 year agoGiuseppe
1 year agoJacqueline
1 year agoSharee
1 year agoFelicitas
1 year agoAlpha
2 years agoCarlota
2 years agoSalina
2 years agoHerman
2 years agoCarey
2 years agoShantell
2 years agoPa
2 years agoLong
2 years agoJeanice
2 years agoKristel
2 years agoCarla
2 years agoJose
2 years agoShantay
2 years agoStephania
2 years agoMarcelle
2 years agoNguyet
2 years agoMalcolm
2 years agoYaeko
2 years agoMarge
2 years agoVeronica
2 years ago