Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Topic 3 Question 94 Discussion

Your team is developing an application that will be used by consumers all over the world. Currently, the application sits behind a global external application load balancer You need to protect the application from potential application-level attacks. What should you do?
C) Create a Google Cloud Armor security policy with web application firewall rules, and apply the security policy to the backend service.
A) Enable Cloud CDN on the backend service.
B) Create multiple firewall deny rules to block malicious users, and apply them to the global external application load balancer
D) Create a VPC Service Controls perimeter with the global external application load balancer as the protected service, and apply it to the backend service

Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Topic 3 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Network Engineer exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 3
[All Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions]

Your team is developing an application that will be used by consumers all over the world. Currently, the application sits behind a global external application load balancer You need to protect the application from potential application-level attacks. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is C because it meets the requirement of protecting the application from potential application-level attacks.Google Cloud Armor security policies are sets of rules that match on attributes from Layer 3 to Layer 7 to protect externally facing applications1.Web application firewall (WAF) rules are predefined rules that detect and mitigate common web attacks such as cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, remote file inclusion, and more2. By applying a Google Cloud Armor security policy with WAF rules to the backend service, you can filter out malicious requests before they reach your application.

Option A is incorrect because Cloud CDN is a content delivery network that caches static content at the edge of Google's network, but it does not provide any protection against application-level attacks3.Option B is incorrect because firewall rules are applied at the VPC network level, not at the load balancer level4.Firewall rules also only match on Layer 3 and 4 attributes, not on Layer 7 attributes that are relevant for application-level attacks4. Option D is incorrect because VPC Service Controls perimeter is a feature that helps you secure your data from unauthorized access by users outside your organization, but it does not protect your application from external attacks.


Security policy overview | Google Cloud Armor

Web application firewall (WAF) rules | Google Cloud Armor

Cloud CDN overview | Google Cloud

Using firewall rules | VPC

[VPC Service Controls overview | Google Cloud]

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Janey
7 months ago
C is the best option here, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
8 months ago
D sounds interesting, but isn't it overkill for just app-level attacks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
8 months ago
Wait, does enabling Cloud CDN really help with security?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
8 months ago
I think B might be enough, but not as effective as C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
8 months ago
C is definitely the way to go for WAF protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
9 months ago
I vaguely recall something about VPC Service Controls, but I don't think that's the main focus here. I feel like option D might not be the best answer for application-level protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between security policies and firewall rules. I think option C is definitely the best way to go for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like creating firewall rules could help too. It seems like option B could be a valid approach, but I'm not confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
9 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of using a web application firewall for protecting against application-level attacks. I think option C might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
9 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option C is the way to go here. Applying a Google Cloud Armor security policy with web application firewall rules is a well-established way to protect against application-level attacks, especially for a global application like this. It's the most robust and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
9 months ago
Option B seems a bit too manual and reactive to me. Creating firewall deny rules to block malicious users could work, but it might be a lot of ongoing maintenance. I think the Google Cloud Armor solution in option C is a more comprehensive and proactive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm not super familiar with Google Cloud Armor, so I'll have to read up on that a bit more. But it does sound like the right approach to protect against application-level attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
9 months ago
I think the key here is to protect the application from application-level attacks, so I'm leaning towards option C. Creating a Google Cloud Armor security policy with web application firewall rules seems like the best way to do that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I know POP3 and SMTP are email protocols, but I can't remember which one provides remote filing capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
2 years ago
I'm not sure, option B also sounds like a good way to block malicious users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
2 years ago
I agree with Renay, option C seems like the best choice to protect the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
2 years ago
I think we should go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
2 years ago
I'm feeling a bit hungry just thinking about all these options. Maybe we should order some pizza and hash this out over a slice or two?
upvoted 0 times
Janessa
2 years ago
Let's order that pizza and celebrate making a good decision for our application security!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
2 years ago
I agree, that seems like the best way to protect the application from potential attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
2 years ago
I think we should go with option C) Create a Google Cloud Armor security policy with web application firewall rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
2 years ago
That sounds like a great idea! I could go for some pizza right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louvenia
2 years ago
Hold up, Option D with the VPC Service Controls sounds interesting too. Gotta keep those backend services locked down, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
2 years ago
Option C looks like the way to go. A web application firewall can really help protect against those pesky application-level attacks.
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
2 years ago
Definitely, a web application firewall can provide an extra layer of security for our global application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 years ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice to protect the application from application-level attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel