Your team is developing an application that will be used by consumers all over the world. Currently, the application sits behind a global external application load balancer You need to protect the application from potential application-level attacks. What should you do?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Security policy overview | Google Cloud Armor
Web application firewall (WAF) rules | Google Cloud Armor
Cloud CDN overview | Google Cloud
[VPC Service Controls overview | Google Cloud]
26 comments · newest first
JA
Janey
11 months ago
C is the best option here, no doubt!
SA
Salome
11 months ago
D sounds interesting, but isn't it overkill for just app-level attacks?
LI
Lindy
11 months ago
Wait, does enabling Cloud CDN really help with security?
MA
Malcolm
11 months ago
I think B might be enough, but not as effective as C.
LO
Lorita
12 months ago
C is definitely the way to go for WAF protection.
HE
Helaine
12 months ago
I vaguely recall something about VPC Service Controls, but I don't think that's the main focus here. I feel like option D might not be the best answer for application-level protection.
MA
Matthew
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between security policies and firewall rules. I think option C is definitely the best way to go for this scenario.
AS
Ashton
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like creating firewall rules could help too. It seems like option B could be a valid approach, but I'm not confident.
AV
Avery
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of using a web application firewall for protecting against application-level attacks. I think option C might be the right choice.
DE
Delmy
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that option C is the way to go here. Applying a Google Cloud Armor security policy with web application firewall rules is a well-established way to protect against application-level attacks, especially for a global application like this. It's the most robust and scalable solution.
TA
Tamala
1 year ago
Option B seems a bit too manual and reactive to me. Creating firewall deny rules to block malicious users could work, but it might be a lot of ongoing maintenance. I think the Google Cloud Armor solution in option C is a more comprehensive and proactive approach.
DO
Dortha
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm not super familiar with Google Cloud Armor, so I'll have to read up on that a bit more. But it does sound like the right approach to protect against application-level attacks.
PE
Pearlie
1 year ago
I think the key here is to protect the application from application-level attacks, so I'm leaning towards option C. Creating a Google Cloud Armor security policy with web application firewall rules seems like the best way to do that.
NA
Nana
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I know POP3 and SMTP are email protocols, but I can't remember which one provides remote filing capabilities.
NO
Noble
2 years ago
I'm not sure, option B also sounds like a good way to block malicious users.
SH
Shaniqua
2 years ago
I agree with Renay, option C seems like the best choice to protect the application.
RE
Renay
2 years ago
I think we should go with option C.
PE
Penney
2 years ago
I'm feeling a bit hungry just thinking about all these options. Maybe we should order some pizza and hash this out over a slice or two?
JA
Janessa
2 years ago
Let's order that pizza and celebrate making a good decision for our application security!
RE
Reta
2 years ago
I agree, that seems like the best way to protect the application from potential attacks.
JI
Jimmie
2 years ago
I think we should go with option C) Create a Google Cloud Armor security policy with web application firewall rules.
CA
Caprice
2 years ago
That sounds like a great idea! I could go for some pizza right now.
LO
Louvenia
2 years ago
Hold up, Option D with the VPC Service Controls sounds interesting too. Gotta keep those backend services locked down, you know?
FA
Fairy
2 years ago
Option C looks like the way to go. A web application firewall can really help protect against those pesky application-level attacks.
GR
Gracia
2 years ago
Definitely, a web application firewall can provide an extra layer of security for our global application.
CH
Cherelle
2 years ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice to protect the application from application-level attacks.