Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Network Engineer exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions]

You ate planning to use Terraform to deploy the Google Cloud infrastructure for your company, The design must meet the following requirements

* Each Google Cloud project must represent an Internal project that your team Will work on

* After an Internal project is finished, the infrastructure must be deleted

* Each Internal project must have Its own Google Cloud project owner to manage the Google Cloud resources.

* You have 10---100 projects deployed at a time

While you are writing the Terraform code, you need to ensure that the deployment is simple and the code is reusable With

centralized management What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The correct answer is D because it meets the following requirements:

Each internal project has its own Google Cloud project, which can be easily created and deleted by Terraform using the google_project resource1.

Each internal project has its own Google Cloud project owner, which can be assigned by Terraform using the google_project_iam_member resource1.

The deployment is simple and the code is reusable with centralized management, because the Shared VPC allows you to connect multiple service projects to a single host project that contains the network resources2.This way, you can use Terraform modules to create and manage the network resources in the host project, and then reference them in the service projects3.

Option A is incorrect because it does not create separate Google Cloud projects for each internal project, which makes it harder to delete the infrastructure and assign project owners.Option B is incorrect because it does not create separate Google Cloud projects for each internal project, and also because it attaches the service projects to a Shared VPC, which is not recommended for short-lived projects2. Option C is incorrect because it does not use a Shared VPC, which means that each internal project has to create and manage its own network resources, which increases complexity and reduces reusability.


google_project - Terraform Registry

Managing infrastructure as code with Terraform, Cloud Build, and GitOps | Google Cloud

Automating your automation by Creating Google Cloud Projects Automatically

by Mozell at Sep 16, 2024, 03:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Glendora
6 months ago
Wait, can you really manage 100 projects like this? Sounds intense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
6 months ago
Each project needs its own owner, so A or C might not fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
6 months ago
I’m not so sure about B, wouldn’t that complicate things?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
7 months ago
I agree, B is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
7 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for centralized management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
7 months ago
I’m uncertain about the best approach, but I recall that having a Shared VPC can simplify networking. I just hope it aligns with the project ownership needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
7 months ago
I feel like creating a single project with multiple VPCs could complicate things, especially with ownership requirements. I might lean towards option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
7 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar from our practice questions, but I'm a bit confused about how centralized management works with multiple projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
8 months ago
I remember we discussed the benefits of using a Shared VPC in class, but I'm not sure if it applies here since we need separate project owners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm not entirely sure which option would be the most efficient and reusable. I'll need to really dive into the details of each approach and weigh the pros and cons. Definitely going to need to do some research before committing to a solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
8 months ago
I think I've got a handle on this. The key is finding a way to balance the individual project ownership requirements with the need for centralized management. Option B, the Shared VPC with service projects, seems like the best approach to meet all the criteria. Time to start drafting that Terraform code!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
8 months ago
Whew, this is a lot to think about. I'm a bit confused on the difference between a single project with VPCs versus a Shared VPC with service projects. I'll need to review the details carefully to make sure I understand the tradeoffs before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
8 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'm thinking I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around project ownership and reusability. Hmm, maybe a Shared VPC could help with the centralized management aspect?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
8 months ago
Okay, let's see here. We need to ensure each internal project has its own project owner, but also keep the deployment simple and the code reusable. I'm leaning towards option B - a single Shared VPC with each project as a service project. That way we can manage everything centrally.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about the capabilities of beadm, so I need to recall what I know about that tool and match it to the answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
2 years ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of centralized vs. decentralized infrastructure. I say go with option D and let the cloud gods sort it out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
2 years ago
I'm no Terraform expert, but I think option D is the way to go. Shared VPC and service projects sounds like the most efficient solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Dierdre
2 years ago
It's important to make sure the deployment is simple and the code is reusable
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
2 years ago
Shared VPC and service projects would definitely help with centralized management
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
2 years ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice for this scenario
upvoted 0 times
...
...
France
2 years ago
Option C sounds like a real headache. A single project and VPC for each internal project? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
Glory
2 years ago
Yeah, Option B is definitely the way to go. It would ensure that each internal project has its own Google Cloud project owner and make it easier to manage the infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
2 years ago
I agree, Option B seems like the most efficient way to meet the requirements. It would definitely simplify the deployment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
2 years ago
Option B sounds like the best choice. Creating a Single Shared VPC and attaching each Google Cloud project as a service project would make management much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vince
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure option A is a good idea. Creating a separate VPC for each project could quickly become unwieldy with 10-100 projects.
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
2 years ago
I think we should go with option B for simplicity and ease of management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
2 years ago
That's true, a Shared VPC would make it easier to manage all the projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
2 years ago
Option B seems like a better choice, using a Shared VPC for centralized management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
2 years ago
I agree, managing separate VPCs for each project could be a challenge.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
2 years ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option B is more efficient in terms of management and reusability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better as it provides each internal project with its own project and VPC for better isolation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
2 years ago
Option B sounds good to me. A single Shared VPC with each project as a service project should make it easy to manage the infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
2 years ago
I think option D is the best choice. Creating a Shared VPC and service project for each internal project seems to meet all the requirements while keeping the deployment simple and the code reusable.
upvoted 0 times
Catarina
2 years ago
Definitely, option D ensures that the infrastructure can be easily deleted after each internal project is finished.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
2 years ago
It also aligns with the requirement of having each internal project with its own Google Cloud project owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
2 years ago
Yes, having a Shared VPC and service project for each internal project would make management easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
2 years ago
I agree, option D seems to be the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
2 years ago
I think option B is the best choice because it allows for centralized management and easy deletion of projects.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel