Discuss Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam Topic 2 Question 95

You ate planning to use Terraform to deploy the Google Cloud infrastructure for your company, The design must meet the following requirements

* Each Google Cloud project must represent an Internal project that your team Will work on

* After an Internal project is finished, the infrastructure must be deleted

* Each Internal project must have Its own Google Cloud project owner to manage the Google Cloud resources.

* You have 10---100 projects deployed at a time

While you are writing the Terraform code, you need to ensure that the deployment is simple and the code is reusable With

centralized management What should you do?

ACreate a Single project and additional VPCs for each internal project

BCreate a Single Shared VPC and attach each Google Cloud project as a service project

CdCreate a Single project and Single VPC for each internal project

DCreate a Shared VPC and service project for each internal project

Suggested Answer: D

The correct answer is D because it meets the following requirements:

Each internal project has its own Google Cloud project, which can be easily created and deleted by Terraform using the google_project resource1.

Each internal project has its own Google Cloud project owner, which can be assigned by Terraform using the google_project_iam_member resource1.

The deployment is simple and the code is reusable with centralized management, because the Shared VPC allows you to connect multiple service projects to a single host project that contains the network resources2.This way, you can use Terraform modules to create and manage the network resources in the host project, and then reference them in the service projects3.

Option A is incorrect because it does not create separate Google Cloud projects for each internal project, which makes it harder to delete the infrastructure and assign project owners.Option B is incorrect because it does not create separate Google Cloud projects for each internal project, and also because it attaches the service projects to a Shared VPC, which is not recommended for short-lived projects2. Option C is incorrect because it does not use a Shared VPC, which means that each internal project has to create and manage its own network resources, which increases complexity and reduces reusability.

google_project - Terraform Registry

Managing infrastructure as code with Terraform, Cloud Build, and GitOps | Google Cloud

Automating your automation by Creating Google Cloud Projects Automatically

Get Premium Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

38 comments · newest first

Glendora 11 months ago

Wait, can you really manage 100 projects like this? Sounds intense!

Kenda 11 months ago

Each project needs its own owner, so A or C might not fit.

Toshia 11 months ago

I’m not so sure about B, wouldn’t that complicate things?

Nickolas 11 months ago

I agree, B is definitely the way to go!

Veronika 12 months ago

Option B seems like the best choice for centralized management.

Georgiana 12 months ago

I’m uncertain about the best approach, but I recall that having a Shared VPC can simplify networking. I just hope it aligns with the project ownership needs.

Celeste 1 year ago

I feel like creating a single project with multiple VPCs could complicate things, especially with ownership requirements. I might lean towards option D.

Tasia 1 year ago

I think option B sounds familiar from our practice questions, but I'm a bit confused about how centralized management works with multiple projects.

Kris 1 year ago

I remember we discussed the benefits of using a Shared VPC in class, but I'm not sure if it applies here since we need separate project owners.

Serina 1 year ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm not entirely sure which option would be the most efficient and reusable. I'll need to really dive into the details of each approach and weigh the pros and cons. Definitely going to need to do some research before committing to a solution.

Izetta 1 year ago

I think I've got a handle on this. The key is finding a way to balance the individual project ownership requirements with the need for centralized management. Option B, the Shared VPC with service projects, seems like the best approach to meet all the criteria. Time to start drafting that Terraform code!

Leah 1 year ago

Whew, this is a lot to think about. I'm a bit confused on the difference between a single project with VPCs versus a Shared VPC with service projects. I'll need to review the details carefully to make sure I understand the tradeoffs before deciding.

Latia 1 year ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'm thinking I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around project ownership and reusability. Hmm, maybe a Shared VPC could help with the centralized management aspect?

Aliza 1 year ago

Okay, let's see here. We need to ensure each internal project has its own project owner, but also keep the deployment simple and the code reusable. I'm leaning towards option B - a single Shared VPC with each project as a service project. That way we can manage everything centrally.

Annmarie 1 year ago

Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about the capabilities of beadm, so I need to recall what I know about that tool and match it to the answer choices.

Brittni 2 years ago

Ah, the age-old dilemma of centralized vs. decentralized infrastructure. I say go with option D and let the cloud gods sort it out!

Alida 2 years ago

I'm no Terraform expert, but I think option D is the way to go. Shared VPC and service projects sounds like the most efficient solution here.

Dierdre 2 years ago

↳ replying to Alida

It's important to make sure the deployment is simple and the code is reusable

Susana 2 years ago

↳ replying to Alida

Shared VPC and service projects would definitely help with centralized management

Felicia 2 years ago

↳ replying to Alida

I agree, option D seems like the best choice for this scenario

France 2 years ago

Option C sounds like a real headache. A single project and VPC for each internal project? That's just asking for trouble!

Glory 2 years ago

↳ replying to France

Yeah, Option B is definitely the way to go. It would ensure that each internal project has its own Google Cloud project owner and make it easier to manage the infrastructure.

Sherita 2 years ago

↳ replying to France

I agree, Option B seems like the most efficient way to meet the requirements. It would definitely simplify the deployment process.

Tien 2 years ago

↳ replying to France

Option B sounds like the best choice. Creating a Single Shared VPC and attaching each Google Cloud project as a service project would make management much easier.

Vince 2 years ago

Hmm, I'm not sure option A is a good idea. Creating a separate VPC for each project could quickly become unwieldy with 10-100 projects.

Stephaine 2 years ago

↳ replying to Vince

I think we should go with option B for simplicity and ease of management.

Justa 2 years ago

↳ replying to Vince

That's true, a Shared VPC would make it easier to manage all the projects.

Aimee 2 years ago

↳ replying to Vince

Option B seems like a better choice, using a Shared VPC for centralized management.

Mattie 2 years ago

↳ replying to Vince

I agree, managing separate VPCs for each project could be a challenge.

Erasmo 2 years ago

That's a valid point, but I still think option B is more efficient in terms of management and reusability.

Elli 2 years ago

I disagree, I believe option C is better as it provides each internal project with its own project and VPC for better isolation.

Elouise 2 years ago

Option B sounds good to me. A single Shared VPC with each project as a service project should make it easy to manage the infrastructure.

Alyssa 2 years ago

I think option D is the best choice. Creating a Shared VPC and service project for each internal project seems to meet all the requirements while keeping the deployment simple and the code reusable.

Catarina 2 years ago

↳ replying to Alyssa

Definitely, option D ensures that the infrastructure can be easily deleted after each internal project is finished.

Buddy 2 years ago

↳ replying to Alyssa

It also aligns with the requirement of having each internal project with its own Google Cloud project owner.

Arlette 2 years ago

↳ replying to Alyssa

Yes, having a Shared VPC and service project for each internal project would make management easier.

Rory 2 years ago

↳ replying to Alyssa

I agree, option D seems to be the most efficient choice.

Erasmo 2 years ago

I think option B is the best choice because it allows for centralized management and easy deletion of projects.

Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion