Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam - Topic 1 Question 88 Discussion

Posted by Dorethea on Mar 09, 2025 at 09:34 PM

Your company's security team needs to have read-only access to Data Access audit logs in the _Required bucket You want to provide your security team with the necessary permissions following the principle of least privilege and Google-recommended practices. What should you do?

Suggested Answer: B, E
Get Premium Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
RO
Royal 11 months ago
D seems like overkill, just use B!
DE
Deeanna 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the privateLogViewer role? Sounds sketchy.
BL
Blondell 11 months ago
Definitely B, it's cleaner and follows best practices.
VE
Veronika 11 months ago
I think A is better for individual control.
KA
Kanisha 12 months ago
B is the way to go for group access!
SE
Sena 12 months ago
I feel like option D might be the best approach since it assigns the role to a group, but I’m not entirely confident about the naming conventions.
GE
Germaine 1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between the viewer role and the privateLogViewer role. Does anyone remember which one is more appropriate for read-only access?
VI
Viola 1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think assigning roles to a group is more efficient. Maybe option B is the right choice?
AM
Amber 1 year ago
I think we should focus on the principle of least privilege, but I'm not sure if assigning roles to individuals or a group is better.
JU
Juliann 1 year ago
I'm not sure about the difference between the "roles/logging.viewer" and "roles/logging.privateLogViewer" roles. I think I'll need to do some more research on the Google-recommended practices before deciding on the best option.
MI
Micah 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that option A is the way to go here. Assigning the roles/logging.viewer role to each member of the security team seems like the most straightforward and least privileged approach.
MO
Monte 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through. The question says we want to provide read-only access, so we need to use a role that gives that level of access. I'm leaning towards option D - assigning the roles/logging.privateLogViewer role to a group with all the security team members.
KA
Katie 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused here. Is the "roles/logging.viewer" role the same as the "roles/logging, viewer" role? I'm not sure which one is the correct choice.
JE
Jenise 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems pretty straightforward. I think I'll go with option B - assigning the roles/logging.viewer role to a group with all the security team members.
FR
Franchesca 1 year ago
Wait, is this a trick question? What's with all these 'logging' and 'privateLogViewer' roles? I thought we were just supposed to give them read-only access. *scratches head*
SH
Shawna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Franchesca
It's not a trick question, just make sure to follow the principle of least privilege and give them only the necessary permissions.
RI
Richelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Franchesca
You can also consider using the 'roles/logging.privateLogViewer' role for more restricted access to the logs.
RI
Rikki 1 year ago
↳ replying to Franchesca
You can assign the 'roles/logging.viewer' role to the security team for read-only access to Data Access audit logs.
LA
Laurel 1 year ago
I'm going with option D. Assigning the role to a group is more efficient, and the privateLogViewer role sounds like it's the right one for the task.
GA
Gary 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laurel
Let's go with that option then.
BO
Bo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laurel
PrivateLogViewer role seems like the right one for the task.
ST
Stacey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laurel
Option D sounds good. Assigning the role to a group is efficient.
RO
Rosenda 1 year ago
Option A is the way to go! Assigning the roles/logging.viewer role to each team member is the simplest and most straightforward approach.
KI
Kizzy 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Shouldn't we be using the roles/logging.viewer role instead of the privateLogViewer role? I'm a bit confused.
AB
Abraham 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kizzy
B) Assign the roles/logging.viewer role to a group with all the security team members
CH
Chan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kizzy
A) Assign the roles/logging.viewer role to each member of the security team
GE
Gene 2 years ago
Option D seems like the correct answer to me. Assigning the privateLogViewer role to a group ensures that the security team has the necessary read-only access.
MA
Maryann 2 years ago
I think option B is the way to go. Assigning the role to a group makes it easier to manage permissions and follows the principle of least privilege.
CH
Chauncey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Maryann
Assigning roles to a group with all security team members is a good way to ensure consistency and ease of management.
PE
Peggie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Maryann
It's important to follow Google-recommended practices when setting up permissions for security teams.
JE
Jennifer 1 year ago
↳ replying to Maryann
Assigning the role to a group simplifies the process and ensures least privilege access.
CE
Cecil 1 year ago
↳ replying to Maryann
I agree, option B is definitely the best choice for managing permissions efficiently.
PE
Peggie 2 years ago
I prefer assigning the roles/logging.viewer role to a group with all the security team members. It's more efficient.
YO
Yolando 2 years ago
I agree with Davida. It's important to follow the principle of least privilege.
DA
Davida 2 years ago
I think we should assign the roles/logging.viewer role to each member of the security team.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel