MENU
You need to create a Cloud Monitoring SLO for a service that will be published soon. You want to verify that requests to the service will be addressed in fewer than 300 ms at least 90% Of the time per calendar month. You need to identify the metric and evaluation method to use. What should you do?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
JE
Jenelle
11 months ago
C is a no-go; we need to focus on latency metrics for this SLO.
DO
Dorothea
11 months ago
90% uptime is pretty standard, but 300 ms seems tight!
AB
Abraham
11 months ago
Wait, are we really measuring latency or availability here?
AN
Anjelica
11 months ago
I think B could work too, but not sure it's the best choice.
JA
Jacqueline
12 months ago
A is definitely the way to go for latency!
EL
Elli
12 months ago
I lean towards option A, but I wonder if there's a scenario where a window-based method might be better for this kind of SLO.
EN
Ena
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like selecting a latency metric is key here, but I can't recall if it should be request-based or window-based.
RO
Rodolfo
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about window-based evaluations being useful for tracking performance over time.
GL
Glenna
1 year ago
I think we should focus on latency since the question specifies response times. A request-based method seems more appropriate for that.
OR
Oren
1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward. The question is asking for a latency SLO, so I'll go with option A to select a latency metric and a request-based evaluation method.
CE
Cecil
1 year ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I think I need to understand the difference between the evaluation methods before I can decide. Maybe I'll come back to this one after reviewing that part.
LO
Louvenia
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. I need to select a latency metric and a request-based evaluation method to meet the 90% of requests under 300ms per month requirement. Option A seems like the right choice here.
SH
Shantay
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Do we need to use a latency metric or an availability metric? And what's the difference between a request-based and window-based evaluation method?
DE
Delsie
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward SLO question. I think the key is to focus on the requirement of 90% of requests being addressed in under 300ms per calendar month.
PA
Paola
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about how to create the QlikView documents with the Year field.
TA
Tayna
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Average Value, but I'm not 100% confident. I'll have to review my notes on how Analytics policies work in NetProfiler.
TO
Tommy
1 year ago
A) is the way to go. Gotta love these exam questions that are pretty much fill-in-the-blank. Though I'm still trying to figure out why the service will be 'published soon' - is it going to be a bestselling novel or something?
CR
Cruz
1 year ago
Hmm, this one's a no-brainer. A) is the right choice - latency metric and request-based evaluation. Though I'm a bit curious why they didn't just say 'select option A' instead of all this mumbo-jumbo.
DO
Domingo
1 year ago
A) is the clear winner here. Latency is the metric you need, and a request-based method is the way to go to meet the 90% threshold per calendar month.
LO
Loren
1 year ago
Definitely go with A) Select a latency metric for a request-based method of evaluation. That's the only option that matches the criteria of verifying requests are addressed in fewer than 300 ms at least 90% of the time.
TE
Terina
1 year ago
D) Go with a latency metric for a time-based method of evaluation.
TI
Tien
1 year ago
C) Opt for an error rate metric for a request-based method of evaluation.
JO
Jonell
1 year ago
B) Choose a throughput metric for a time-based method of evaluation.
MA
Magnolia
1 year ago
A) Select a latency metric for a request-based method of evaluation.
KA
Kate
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe we should select an availability metric for a window-based method of evaluation.
AS
Ashton
2 years ago
I agree with Lashanda, it makes sense to track latency for this type of service.
LA
Lashanda
2 years ago
I think we should select a latency metric for a request-based method of evaluation.
EL
Elena
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe we should select an availability metric for a window-based method of evaluation.
IS
Isaac
2 years ago
I agree with Dottie, it makes sense to track latency for this type of service.
DO
Dottie
2 years ago
I think we should select a latency metric for a request-based method of evaluation.