New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Cloud Architect Exam - Topic 10 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Architect exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 10
[All Professional Cloud Architect Questions]

Your company has a project in Google Cloud with three Virtual Private Clouds (VPCs). There is a Compute Engine instance on each VPC. Network subnets do not overlap and must remain separated. The network configuration is shown below.

Instance #1 is an exception and must communicate directly with both Instance #2 and Instance #3 via internal IPs. How should you accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

This option can help create an organization structure that allows developers to create projects, but prevents them from modifying production projects. Folders are containers for projects and other folders within Google Cloud organizations. Folders allow resources to be structured hierarchically and inherit policies from their parent resources. By creating folders under the organization resource named ''Development'' and ''Production'', you can organize your projects by environment and apply different policies to them. By granting all developers the Project Creator IAM role on the ''Development'' folder, you can allow them to create projects under that folder, but not under the ''Production'' folder. By moving the developer projects into the ''Development'' folder, you can ensure that they are subject to the policies set on that folder. By setting the policies for all projects on the organization, you can manage policies centrally and efficiently. By additionally setting the production policies on the ''Production'' folder, you can enforce more restrictive policies for production projects and prevent developers from modifying them. The other options are not optimal for this scenario, because they either create a second Google Workspace account and organization, which increases complexity and cost (A), or do not use folders to organize projects by environment, which makes it harder to manage policies and permissions (B, D). Reference:

https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/creating-managing-folders

https://cloud.google.com/architecture/framework/system-design


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Bette
3 months ago
I think VPN tunnels (Option C) would add unnecessary overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
3 months ago
Peering all three VPCs (Option D) could work too, but might complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
4 months ago
Wait, can you really add multiple NICs like that? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
4 months ago
I agree, adding NICs is a straightforward solution!
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
4 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for direct communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
4 months ago
I feel like the VPN tunnels option might be overkill for this scenario, but I can't recall the specifics of when to use them versus peering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this where we had to set up VPC peering. I wonder if peering all three VPCs would be the right choice here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
5 months ago
I think creating a cloud router could work, but I’m not entirely clear on how it would handle the internal IPs between the instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
5 months ago
I remember something about using additional NICs for instances to allow communication across different VPCs, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
5 months ago
I've got this! Option D with VPC peering looks like the cleanest way to connect Instance #1 while maintaining the network separation. I'll just need to make sure the firewall rules are set up correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different VPC and subnet configurations. I'll need to make sure I understand the requirements and the implications of each solution before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky networking question. I'll need to carefully review the network configuration and think through the options to find the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
5 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I think the key is to find a way to connect Instance #1 to the other two instances while keeping the subnets separate. Option B looks promising with the additional NICs, but I'll need to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is A. Vlocity CPQ is designed to support the entire configure, price, and quote process for products, so that's the best fit for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
5 months ago
I keep mixing up the numbers for HD calls versus standard calls. Maybe it's 500 for HD, but that feels too high?
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the impact of adding a non-contributing predictor variable to the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember practicing something similar where we had to verify configurations without testing calls. Wasn't there something about trace logs too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
10 months ago
The real question is, can Instance #1 communicate with the refrigerator in the break room? Now that's the kind of connectivity I'm looking for.
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
9 months ago
User 3: Or we could just take a break and walk to the break room to get our snacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
9 months ago
User 2: Maybe we can set up a special network just for the refrigerator!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
9 months ago
User 1: Haha, that would be convenient if Instance #1 could communicate with the refrigerator in the break room.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chandra
10 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Imagine trying to explain VPN tunnels or VPC peering to your boss. 'Yeah, we're going to make the network more complicated to fix a simple problem.' Nah, I'll stick with the NIC solution.
upvoted 0 times
Deane
9 months ago
Yeah, explaining VPN tunnels or VPC peering does sound more complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
9 months ago
I agree, adding NICs seems like the simplest way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
10 months ago
Option B is definitely the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Della
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure why anyone would create a cloud router to advertise subnets in Option A. Seems like a lot of extra work when you can just use additional NICs.
upvoted 0 times
Julianna
9 months ago
I think Option B is the most efficient way to accomplish the task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
9 months ago
Adding NICs to Instance #1 would definitely make it easier to communicate with the other instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
9 months ago
Yeah, creating a cloud router does seem unnecessary in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
10 months ago
I agree, using additional NICs seems like a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amalia
10 months ago
I'm not a fan of the VPN tunnels in Option C. That seems like unnecessary complexity for this scenario. I'd go with the VPC peering in Option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
11 months ago
That's a good point, Chu. Peering the VPCs could simplify the network configuration and improve communication efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the way to go. Peering all three VPCs will create a direct connection between them, making communication easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
11 months ago
Option B seems the most straightforward approach. Adding additional NICs to Instance #1 and updating the firewall rules should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
10 months ago
Yes, adding NICs to Instance #1 and updating the firewall rules should allow direct communication between the instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
10 months ago
I agree, Option B does seem like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edmond
11 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. Adding additional NICs to Instance #1 seems like the most direct way to enable communication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel