New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Cloud Architect Exam - Topic 1 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Architect exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 1
[All Professional Cloud Architect Questions]

For this question, refer to the TerramEarth case study. You are building a microservice-based application for TerramEarth. The application is based on Docker containers. You want to follow Google-recommended practices to build the application continuously and store the build artifacts. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Miesha
3 months ago
Wait, why would you tag with a timestamp? That’s confusing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
3 months ago
D is outdated, Cloud Storage isn't ideal for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
3 months ago
C sounds risky with that minute check, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
4 months ago
I disagree, A seems simpler for a single container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
4 months ago
B is the way to go! Tagging with the commit hash is smart.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that pushing to Artifact Registry is preferred over Cloud Storage for container images. So, I think options A and B are more aligned with best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
4 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to choose between tagging strategies. I think tagging with the commit hash is a good idea for tracking changes, which makes me favor option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think using a Scheduler job like in option C might not be the best practice. It seems a bit inefficient compared to triggers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of tagging images with version numbers instead of just 'latest' to avoid confusion. So, I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on continuous integration and deployment practices. I think I can handle this one.Aditya: Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different options here. I'll need to carefully read through each one and think about the Google-recommended practices mentioned in the question.Olivia: Okay, the key here is to follow the Google-recommended practices. I think option B is the way to go - building and tagging the container images with the commit hash seems like the best approach.Liam: I'm not too familiar with Cloud Build and Artifact Registry, but I'll give it my best shot. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences between the options before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
5 months ago
I'm not too familiar with Cloud Build and Artifact Registry, but I'll give it my best shot. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences between the options before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
Okay, the key here is to follow the Google-recommended practices. I think option B is the way to go - building and tagging the container images with the commit hash seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different options here. I'll need to carefully read through each one and think about the Google-recommended practices mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on continuous integration and deployment practices. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 year ago
I think D is the correct answer because it mentions version numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards C, it makes more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 year ago
Option A looks good, but I'm not sure about the 'latest' tag. Wouldn't it be better to use the commit hash like in Option B?
upvoted 0 times
Stephanie
1 year ago
But using the current timestamp like in Option C could also be a good approach for versioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 year ago
I agree, using the commit hash for tagging seems more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alaine
1 year ago
Haha, a Scheduler job to check the repo every minute? That's overkill! I'd go with Option B and keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
Option B is the way to go! Tagging the images with the commit hash is a great way to track the source code version.
upvoted 0 times
Dannette
1 year ago
It's important to follow Google-recommended practices for building and storing artifacts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
1 year ago
Tagging the images with the commit hash is a smart move for microservices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
1 year ago
I agree, option B is the best choice for tracking source code versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel