Google ChromeOS Administrator Exam - Topic 5 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's ChromeOS Administrator exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 5

You have been tasked with organizing separated policies that apply to devices or users. Using Google's best practices, how would you structure your OUs to best achieve this?

AApply all policies to a single OU, then move devices and users to that OU

BCreate a unique OU to apply devices and user policies

CCreate a dedicated OU branch for devices, and another one for the users

DManage all policies from the root OU

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Following Google's best practices, it is recommended to create separate OU branches for devices and users. This organizational structure allows administrators to apply distinct policies to users and devices, minimizing the risk of conflicting settings and ensuring better control and management.

Verified Answer from Official Source:

The correct answer is verified from the Google Workspace Organizational Units Best Practices, which highlights the importance of keeping user and device policies separate for clarity and management efficiency.

'To efficiently manage users and devices, it is recommended to create separate organizational units (OUs) for devices and users. This approach allows for targeted policy application.'

By creating separate OUs, admins can manage device-specific settings independently from user policies, reducing complexity and potential errors.

Objectives:

Structure OUs efficiently for device and user management.

Implement best practices for organizational management.

Google Workspace Organizational Units Best Practices

by Von at Jul 14, 2025, 08:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ChromeOS Administrator Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Josphine

3 months ago

Unique OUs for devices and users is definitely the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlean

3 months ago

Surprised that people would choose A, that seems chaotic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

3 months ago

Root OU management is a recipe for disaster, go with C!

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

3 months ago

I disagree, option B is simpler and more efficient!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

3 months ago

I think option C makes the most sense for clarity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

4 months ago

I feel like applying all policies to a single OU might not be the best approach, but I can't recall why that would be a problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrina

4 months ago

I’m leaning towards option C because it seems like a good way to keep things organized, but I’m a bit unsure about the specifics of how that would work in practice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like managing everything from the root OU could lead to confusion, so I wouldn't choose D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

4 months ago

I think I remember that it's better to have separate OUs for devices and users, but I'm not sure if that's option C or B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tennie

4 months ago

I think option D is the way to go. Keeping everything in the root OU seems like the simplest solution, and I don't want to overcomplicate things. As long as I'm following Google's best practices, I should be good to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

5 months ago

Option A seems like the easiest approach, but I'm not sure if that's the most efficient in the long run. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each approach to make sure I'm following Google's guidance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brynn

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'm thinking option B might be the way to go, but I'm a bit confused on the best practices Google recommends. I'll need to review that before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Layla

5 months ago

This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd go with option C - creating dedicated OU branches for devices and users. That way, I can apply policies more precisely and avoid any confusion.

upvoted 0 times

...