Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google ChromeOS Administrator Exam - Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Posted by Douglass on Aug 03, 2024 at 07:09 PM

Your security team asks you to deploy on ChromeOS only a specific Android app for your security department. As a ChromeOS Administrator, you need to find a way to block all other Android apps except the one that you need. How are you going to proceed?

Suggested Answer: B

Access Google Admin Console:Sign in to your Google Admin console.

Navigate to Device Management:Go to Devices > Chrome > Settings > Users & browsers.

Locate Play Store Settings:Find the section related to the Play Store.

Enable Allowlist Policy:Activate the policy 'Block all apps,admin manages allowlist.'

Add the Security App:Go to the 'Apps & extensions' section and add the specific Android app that you want to allow for the security team's organizational unit (OU).

This configuration ensures that all other Android apps are blocked from installation on ChromeOS devices, except the specified security app. This provides granular control over app deployment and enhances security by preventing unauthorized app usage.


Get Premium ChromeOS Administrator Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
DO
Domitila 11 months ago
D is a bit overkill, just need to block the rest, right?
HA
Haley 11 months ago
I think A could work too, but B is more comprehensive.
CE
Cecilia 11 months ago
Wait, can you really block all apps like that? Sounds too good to be true.
CA
Carman 11 months ago
I agree, B is definitely the way to go!
GI
Gilma 12 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for blocking all other apps.
AL
Alex 12 months ago
I recall that we can manage app installations through the OU settings, but I’m not sure if we need to force install the app or just allow it. Option D seems interesting.
CA
Carlota 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about whether we should use the 'Apps & extensions' page or the 'Users & Browser Settings.' I feel like both could be relevant here.
CA
Carol 1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to allow specific apps. I think option B sounds right because it mentions blocking all apps except the allowed ones.
DE
Delisa 1 year ago
I think we need to focus on the 'Users & Browser Settings' for managing the Play Store, but I'm not entirely sure if we should block all apps first.
NI
Nichelle 1 year ago
Option C looks like the most comprehensive approach - block everything and then whitelist the specific app on both the Play Store and Chrome Web Store. That should cover all our bases.
DE
Deane 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused. Do we need to do anything with the Chrome Web Store as well, or just the Play Store? I want to make sure I don't miss a step.
EZ
Ezekiel 1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I think I'd go with option B - block all apps and then allow the specific one the security team needs.
IZ
Izetta 1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The key is using the 'Block all apps, admin manages allowlist' policy to lock it down, and then just adding the approved app. Shouldn't be too tricky to implement.
JA
Jaleesa 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is that the question is asking about a networking feature that allows multiple uplink adapters to be associated with a single switch. That sounds like it's referring to NIC Teaming, which is the correct answer.
YO
Yolando 1 year ago
Okay, I think I know the answer to this. I'll go with option A - obtaining the risk owner's approval.
LI
Lili 2 years ago
As a ChromeOS admin, I need to maintain control. Option B looks like the way to go to keep things secure.
IV
Ivette 2 years ago
Haha, 'Force Install & pin to ChromeOS taskbar'? What is this, a ChromeOS dictatorship? I'll go with option B.
YU
Yun 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ivette
Definitely, option B is the way to go to maintain control over app access.
BE
Bernadine 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ivette
I agree, option B is the most straightforward way to ensure only the necessary app is available.
LE
Leota 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ivette
Yeah, that does sound a bit intense. Option B seems like the best choice.
DO
Domonique 2 years ago
I think option D is the most efficient. By adding the Android app to the security team user OU and selecting 'Force Install * pin to ChromeOS taskbar', we ensure that the app is easily accessible for the security department.
AN
Andrew 2 years ago
That's a good point, Jesusita. But option C also seems like a viable solution. We can use the same policy for the Chrome Web Store and only allow the necessary Android app.
JE
Jesusita 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more secure. By using the 'Block all apps, admin manages allowlist' policy for the Play Store, we can control which apps are allowed.
RE
Renea 2 years ago
I like how option C provides a comprehensive solution by blocking the Play Store and only allowing the specific app.
AN
Andrew 2 years ago
I think option A is the best choice. It allows us to add the specific Android app to the security team user OU.
SH
Shalon 2 years ago
Option B seems the most straightforward way to allow only the required Android app and block all others.
LA
Lavonna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shalon
That's true. It's important to have strict control over the apps that can be accessed on ChromeOS for security reasons.
LI
Lili 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shalon
I agree, using the 'Block all apps, admin manages allowlist' policy for the Play Store is a good way to control which apps are allowed.
TA
Tasia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shalon
Option B seems the most straightforward way to allow only the required Android app and block all others.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel