Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Associate Cloud Engineer Exam - Topic 4 Question 95 Discussion

Posted by Floyd on Sep 17, 2024 at 12:11 PM

You have deployed an application on a Compute Engine instance. An external consultant needs to access the Linux-based instance. The consultant is connected to your corporate network through a VPN connection, but the consultant has no Google account. What should you do?

Get Premium Associate Cloud Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
AN
An 11 months ago
I think C is the best choice, but I'm surprised it's not more common knowledge!
MI
Michell 11 months ago
Definitely not D, that’s a huge security no-no.
TA
Tamesha 11 months ago
Wait, why would you ever ask for a private key? That's risky!
OL
Olen 11 months ago
I disagree, using the public IP (Option B) is simpler.
AL
Alline 12 months ago
Option C is the way to go! SSH keys are secure.
EA
Earleen 12 months ago
Option D seems wrong to me; I remember we shouldn't share private keys. It has to be option C, right? But I hope I’m not mixing things up!
FA
Fannie 1 year ago
I feel like option B could work since the consultant is on a VPN, but I’m not sure if using the public IP is the best practice without a Google account.
RO
Rolland 1 year ago
I remember discussing Identity-Aware Proxy in relation to secure access, so option A might be a good choice too, but I’m not confident about the gcloud command specifics.
PE
Penney 1 year ago
I think option C sounds familiar, like something we practiced in class about SSH key management. But I'm not entirely sure if that's the only way to do it.
NI
Nikita 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. Using the public IP address doesn't seem secure, and I'm not familiar with Identity-Aware Proxy. I think I'll go with option C to be on the safe side.
DO
Dominque 1 year ago
Option C sounds like the way to go. It's a common approach for granting external access to a Linux instance without requiring a Google account. I'll make sure to carefully follow the steps to add the consultant's public key.
RO
Roxanne 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm not sure if using the public IP address is the best approach since the consultant doesn't have a Google account. Maybe I should look into the Identity-Aware Proxy option.
WH
Whitley 1 year ago
This seems straightforward. I'd go with option C - having the consultant generate an SSH key pair and providing the public key to access the instance.
CL
Clorinda 1 year ago
I definitely know a server template isn't required, but I can't remember if we need both the CSV upload and the device template specifically.
MA
Marleen 2 years ago
Haha, imagine the consultant trying to use the gcloud tool without a Google account? That's just asking for trouble. C is the clear winner here.
NA
Nakisha 2 years ago
↳ replying to Marleen
Using SSH key pair with option C is the best choice for the consultant to access the Linux-based instance securely.
HU
Huey 2 years ago
↳ replying to Marleen
Agreed, C is the most secure option for adding the consultant's SSH key to the instance.
BE
Bettina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Marleen
Yeah, definitely don't want the consultant to struggle with gcloud without a Google account. C is the way to go.
TA
Tamekia 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about giving the consultant direct access to the instance's public IP. Option B feels a bit risky to me. C is the safer bet.
MA
Macy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Tamekia
It's important to prioritize security when granting access to external consultants.
AR
Arlette 2 years ago
↳ replying to Tamekia
Using SSH key pairs with option C is definitely a safer approach.
FE
Felicidad 2 years ago
↳ replying to Tamekia
I agree, giving direct access through the public IP does seem risky.
AL
Alpha 2 years ago
I agree with Pearline. Option C is the best choice here. The consultant doesn't need a Google account, and the SSH key pair is a simple solution.
EU
Eugene 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alpha
Definitely. It's a straightforward solution for granting access to the Linux-based instance.
MY
My 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alpha
Agreed. It's the most efficient way to grant access to the consultant.
LA
Lauran 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alpha
I think so too. It's the most secure option as well.
OL
Olive 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alpha
Option C is definitely the way to go. It's simple and doesn't require a Google account.
VE
Venita 2 years ago
That's a good point, Jaleesa. Convenience is important too. It really depends on the specific needs of the consultant.
JA
Jaleesa 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more convenient. Using Identity-Aware Proxy with gcloud compute ssh is easier for the consultant.
PE
Pearline 2 years ago
Option C is the way to go. The consultant can generate an SSH key pair, and you can add the public key to the instance. Secure and straightforward.
KI
Kimberlie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Pearline
Exactly, it's a simple and secure solution for the consultant to access the instance.
NA
Nancey 2 years ago
↳ replying to Pearline
Then you can add the public key to the instance yourself.
JE
Jeanice 2 years ago
↳ replying to Pearline
I agree, having the consultant generate an SSH key pair is the way to go.
TH
Theron 2 years ago
↳ replying to Pearline
Option C is the best choice. It's secure and easy.
VE
Venita 2 years ago
I think option C is the best choice. It's secure and allows the consultant to access the instance with their private key.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel