Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Exin Exam ASM Topic 1 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's ASM exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 1
[All ASM Questions]

In Scrum, it is advised to keep Scrum teams relatively small. The reason is that smaller teams are more productive. Why are smaller teams generally more productive?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Allene at Jul 30, 2025, 06:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ASM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rikki
41 minutes ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I feel like the visibility of contributions in smaller teams really boosts productivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
6 days ago
I think option A makes sense because it reduces the chances of sub-groups forming, which can slow things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
11 days ago
I remember reading that smaller teams can communicate more effectively, but I'm not sure if it's just about similar backgrounds or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
17 days ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Are we supposed to be looking for the main reason why smaller teams are more productive, or just any reason? I'm leaning towards option A, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
22 days ago
Okay, I've got it. Smaller teams are more productive because there's less overhead and bureaucracy to deal with. Everyone's contributions are more visible, and it's easier to coordinate and stay aligned. I'm going with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
28 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question is asking why smaller teams are more productive, but the options don't seem to directly address that. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
1 month ago
I think the key here is that smaller teams have better coordination and communication, which makes them more productive. Option A seems to capture that idea well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
3 months ago
Haha, option B is clearly the most absurd choice. Switching between projects every sprint? That's a recipe for disaster, not productivity!
upvoted 0 times
Thersa
2 months ago
C) Because small teams usually have Developers with similar backgrounds and technical capabilities which speeds up communication
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
2 months ago
A) Because small teams are less likely to form sub-groups everyone's contribution is more visible and coordinating is easier
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherry
3 months ago
I think small teams are better because they have developers with similar backgrounds, which speeds up communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
3 months ago
I believe small teams are more productive because they are less likely to form sub-groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
3 months ago
I disagree, I think option C is the way to go. Having a team with similar technical capabilities definitely speeds up communication and collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
Shaniqua
2 months ago
A) Because small teams are less likely to form sub-groups everyone's contribution is more visible and coordinating is easier
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Curt
3 months ago
I agree with Gregg, it's easier to coordinate in small teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
3 months ago
I think smaller teams are more productive because everyone's contribution is more visible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
3 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer. Smaller teams make it easier to coordinate and ensure everyone's contributions are visible.
upvoted 0 times
Arlene
1 month ago
It definitely helps with productivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
1 month ago
Yes, that's true. Everyone's contribution is more visible in small teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
3 months ago
I agree, smaller teams make it easier to coordinate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel