MENU
In Scrum, it is advised to keep Scrum teams relatively small. The reason is that smaller teams are more productive. Why are smaller teams generally more productive?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium ASM Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
SU
Susy
10 months ago
Definitely, less chance for miscommunication in small groups.
PH
Phuong
10 months ago
I think larger teams can be productive too, just depends on the dynamics.
HY
Hyun
11 months ago
Surprised to see this, I always thought bigger teams could tackle more work!
YO
Youlanda
11 months ago
Not sure about the similar backgrounds part, diversity can be a strength too!
AN
Antonio
11 months ago
Smaller teams mean better communication, totally agree!
VA
Van
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about option B; I thought switching projects too often could actually disrupt the team's focus.
RI
Rikki
12 months ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I feel like the visibility of contributions in smaller teams really boosts productivity.
ES
Estrella
12 months ago
I think option A makes sense because it reduces the chances of sub-groups forming, which can slow things down.
KI
Kip
12 months ago
I remember reading that smaller teams can communicate more effectively, but I'm not sure if it's just about similar backgrounds or something else.
ED
Edna
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Are we supposed to be looking for the main reason why smaller teams are more productive, or just any reason? I'm leaning towards option A, but I'm not 100% sure.
AL
Alayna
1 year ago
Okay, I've got it. Smaller teams are more productive because there's less overhead and bureaucracy to deal with. Everyone's contributions are more visible, and it's easier to coordinate and stay aligned. I'm going with option A.
CH
Chauncey
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question is asking why smaller teams are more productive, but the options don't seem to directly address that. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
SA
Sabrina
1 year ago
I think the key here is that smaller teams have better coordination and communication, which makes them more productive. Option A seems to capture that idea well.
CI
Ciara
1 year ago
Haha, option B is clearly the most absurd choice. Switching between projects every sprint? That's a recipe for disaster, not productivity!
TH
Thersa
1 year ago
C) Because small teams usually have Developers with similar backgrounds and technical capabilities which speeds up communication
BO
Bobbye
1 year ago
A) Because small teams are less likely to form sub-groups everyone's contribution is more visible and coordinating is easier
CH
Cherry
1 year ago
I think small teams are better because they have developers with similar backgrounds, which speeds up communication.
CL
Clay
1 year ago
I believe small teams are more productive because they are less likely to form sub-groups.
LE
Leeann
1 year ago
I disagree, I think option C is the way to go. Having a team with similar technical capabilities definitely speeds up communication and collaboration.
SH
Shaniqua
1 year ago
A) Because small teams are less likely to form sub-groups everyone's contribution is more visible and coordinating is easier
CU
Curt
1 year ago
I agree with Gregg, it's easier to coordinate in small teams.
GR
Gregg
1 year ago
I think smaller teams are more productive because everyone's contribution is more visible.
DI
Dierdre
1 year ago
I think option A is the correct answer. Smaller teams make it easier to coordinate and ensure everyone's contributions are visible.
AR
Arlene
1 year ago
It definitely helps with productivity.
ME
Merri
1 year ago
Yes, that's true. Everyone's contribution is more visible in small teams.
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
I agree, smaller teams make it easier to coordinate.