New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 212-89 Exam - Topic 4 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-89 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 4
[All 212-89 Questions]

Quantitative risk is the numerical determination of the probability of an adverse event and the extent of the losses due to the event. Quantitative risk is calculated as:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Chanel at May 03, 2022, 03:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 212-89 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Melissia
4 months ago
A is correct, it's all about probability and loss!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
4 months ago
Not sure about this, can we really quantify all risks like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
4 months ago
Wait, is D even a real option? Sounds complicated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
4 months ago
I thought it was B at first, but A makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verdell
5 months ago
It's definitely A, that's the standard formula.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
5 months ago
I’m confused because option D mentions significant risks, which seems off. I guess I’ll stick with A, but I’m not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we calculated expected losses, and I feel like it was also about multiplying, which makes me think A is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
5 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about dividing loss by probability in a different context. Maybe it’s option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
5 months ago
I think quantitative risk is about multiplying the probability of loss by the potential loss, so I’m leaning towards option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they could potentially cause recursion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know ACK supports some scheduling types, but I can't remember all the details. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. The filter is looking for issues where the Manager field matches the current user and the Manager is also a member of the hr-managers group. So I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
5 months ago
I feel like I might be overthinking this. The access policy should allow traffic, but I'm not certain if the NAT also needs adjustments.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel