Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
EC-Council Certified Incident Handler ECIH v3 212-89 Exam Questions
- Topic 1: Introduction to Incident Handling and Response: This section of the exam measures the competency of Cybersecurity Analysts in understanding the core concepts of information security threats, vulnerabilities, and various attack and defense frameworks. It covers foundational knowledge of incidents, their classification, and the incident management lifecycle. Candidates are expected to be familiar with automation and orchestration in response efforts, industry standards, security best practices, and legal compliance frameworks relevant to incident handling.
- Topic 2: Incident Handling and Response Process: This part evaluates IT Security Operations Managers on their understanding of the structured incident handling and response process. It includes the recording, assignment, and triage of incidents, as well as the procedures for notifying stakeholders and containing threats. The module also examines capabilities in forensic evidence gathering, eradication and recovery strategies, post-incident review activities, and the significance of inter-organizational information sharing.
- Topic 3: First Response: This section of the exam assesses Cybersecurity Analysts in their ability to carry out effective first response procedures. It includes securing and documenting crime scenes, evidence collection methodologies, and guidelines for preserving, packaging, and transporting digital and physical evidence in a way that maintains chain of custody and forensic integrity.
- Topic 4: Handling and Responding to Malware Incidents:In this domain, IT Security Operations Managers are tested on their capacity to respond to malware incidents effectively. The focus lies on planning, detecting, containing, and analyzing malware threats. It also includes strategies for eradication and recovery, alongside evaluating real-world malware case studies and identifying applicable best practices to avoid recurrence.
- Topic 5: Handling and Responding to Email Security Incidents: This part evaluates Cybersecurity Analysts on their ability to detect and mitigate email-based threats. It explores preparation, analysis, and containment measures in response to email-related incidents, as well as post-incident recovery steps. Candidates must interpret case studies and apply best practices for protecting enterprise email systems.
- Topic 6: Handling and Responding to Network Security Incidents: This module assesses IT Security Operations Managers in their expertise to manage network-level security breaches. It includes the detection of unauthorized access, misuse, denial-of-service attacks, and wireless network threats. Practical case studies and preventive strategies are included to ensure operational security across distributed environments.
- Topic 7: Handling and Responding to Web Application Security Incidents: This section measures Cybersecurity Analysts' proficiency in managing web application vulnerabilities and incidents. It covers the preparation, detection, containment, and resolution of threats within web-based platforms. Candidates are expected to understand analytical approaches, case-based examples, and protective techniques for securing application infrastructure.
- Topic 8: Handling and Responding to Cloud Security Incidents: Here, IT Security Operations Managers are examined on their familiarity with cloud-specific threats across platforms like Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud. The focus is on recognizing incident types, handling and monitoring procedures, and recovery methods. The use of real-world scenarios helps to demonstrate effective response tactics and reinforce best practices in cloud environments.
- Topic 9: Handling and Responding to Insider Threats: This module evaluates Cybersecurity Analysts on how well they understand and manage internal security risks. It includes detection and containment of insider threats, analysis and eradication procedures, and recovery from internal breaches. A case-study approach is used to test comprehension of best practices and response strategies that align with organizational policy.
- Topic 10: Handling and Responding to Endpoint Security Incidents: This section measures the abilities of IT Security Operations Managers to protect various endpoint devices, including mobile, IoT, and operational technologies. It addresses the identification and mitigation of endpoint threats, with applied case examples to evaluate readiness and response capacity in complex technical environments.
Free EC-Council Certified Incident Handler ECIH v3 212-89 Exam Actual Questions
Note: Premium EC-Council Certified Incident Handler ECIH v3 212-89 Practice Questions — Last Updated: Oct. 20, 2026 (see below)
A ransomware attack recently disrupted operations at a manufacturing facility, specifically targeting its IoT-integrated conveyor system. While attempting to recover from the incident, the incident response team discovered that the available backups were incomplete---several critical sensor logs and control commands were missing, which caused delays in restoring device functions and syncing with other systems. The team concludes that relying on traditional backup routines alone is insufficient for restoring full IoT functionality after an attack. Which strategy would best prevent such issues in future recovery efforts?
This scenario highlights recovery challenges specific to IoT environments, which are addressed in the ECIH Endpoint and IoT Incident Handling modules. IoT systems generate continuous streams of operational data, configuration states, and control commands that are essential for accurate recovery after disruption.
Option D is correct because maintaining synchronized cloud replicas of critical IoT resources ensures near-real-time availability of sensor data, device configurations, and control logic. ECIH emphasizes that traditional periodic backups are often insufficient for IoT and OT systems due to their dynamic and state-dependent nature. Cloud replication supports faster, more complete restoration and reduces data gaps.
Options A, B, and C rely on static or delayed backup mechanisms that cannot capture the operational state required to restore IoT systems accurately. Tape archives and external drives introduce latency and risk data loss, while ZIP archives lack synchronization.
ECIH recovery guidance stresses resilience and continuity, particularly for operational technology. Continuous replication is therefore the most effective strategy.
Which of the following is a type of malicious code or software that appears legitimate but can take control of your computer?
A Trojan attack involves a type of malicious code or software that appears legitimate but can take control of your computer. Trojans often disguise themselves as legitimate software or are hidden within legitimate software that has been tampered with. They differ from viruses and worms because they do not replicate. However, once activated, Trojans can enable cyber-criminals to spy on you, steal your sensitive data, and gain backdoor access to your system. This can include unauthorized actions such as deleting files, monitoring user activities, or installing additional malicious software.
Following a security alert, the incident response team at a legal consulting firm suspects that an employee used a USB storage device to exfiltrate confidential client data. To confirm which USB device was connected and gather timestamps and identifiers, which method is most effective?
ECIH forensic readiness guidance identifies the Windows Registry as a primary source for USB device artifacts. The Enum\USB registry key stores vendor IDs, product IDs, serial numbers, and connection history.
Option A is correct because it provides direct evidence of which USB devices were connected, when they were installed, and on which system---critical for insider investigations.
Option B cannot reliably identify physical USB usage. Option C contains driver installation data but is less comprehensive. Option D is irrelevant.
Registry analysis is a foundational forensic technique in ECIH, making Option A correct.
A cybersecurity team at a financial services firm detects abnormal behavior on several endpoints, suggesting a possible breach. The anomalies include unexpected data transfers and processes running with unusual permissions. Given the potential impact, the team needs to quickly validate whether these are indicators of a security incident or benign anomalies. What method should the team prioritize to detect and validate the incident effectively?
Explanation (aligned to IH&R lifecycle):
This question is about triage/validation---determining whether what you see is truly an incident and establishing priority. The most appropriate first move is to use endpoint telemetry and behavioral analytics (A) to validate maliciousness (e.g., suspicious parent/child process chains, token manipulation, credential dumping patterns, anomalous privilege escalation, and data transfer behaviors). This supports fast, evidence-based classification and reduces unnecessary disruption. Option (C) is containment and may be required after validation or for clearly high-confidence cases, but immediately disconnecting multiple endpoints can destroy volatile evidence, break business operations, and reduce your ability to trace lateral movement patterns across hosts. Option (B) is a broad preventive change that can create outage risk and is not a validation method. Option (D) can be helpful, but it is slower and not the primary ''detect and validate'' action for an internal team facing active anomalies.
A disciplined approach is: validate via behavioral tooling + logs, scope affected endpoints, determine severity, then execute containment proportional to confirmed risk. That sequencing mirrors standard incident handling flow (identify validate/triage contain eradicate recover lessons learned). When time matters, the highest-value action is the one that converts ambiguous signals into confident incident classification quickly---behavioral validation does that best.
Bob, an incident responder at CyberTech Solutions, is investigating a cybercrime attack occurred in the client company. He acquired the evidence data, preserved it, and started
performing analysis on acquired evidentiary data to identify the source of the crime and the culprit behind the incident.
Identify the forensic investigation phase in which Bob is currently in.
Bob is in the Investigation phase of the forensic investigation process. This phase involves the detailed examination and analysis of the collected evidence to identify the source of the crime and the perpetrator behind the incident. It is a crucial step that follows the acquisition and preservation of evidence, where the incident responder applies various techniques and methodologies to analyze the evidentiary data. This analysis aims to uncover how the cybercrime was committed, trace the activities of the culprit, and gather actionable intelligence to support legal actions and prevent future incidents.
- Select Question Types you want
- Set your Desired Pass Percentage
- Allocate Time (Hours : Minutes)
- Create Multiple Practice tests with Limited Questions
- Customer Support
Adam Johnson
23 days agoEmma Lewis
1 month agoSandra Johnson
2 months agoMaria Murphy
2 months agoLaura Jones
3 months agoJustin Cook
3 months agoHeather Wright
4 months agoSteven Parker
4 months agoEdward Miller
5 months agoDonna Miller
5 months agoRyan Rodriguez
6 months agoSharon Stewart
6 months agoMaria Taylor
5 months agoDorothy Roberts
5 months agoAdam Cook
6 months agoJason Williams
6 months agoCurtis
7 months agoPage
7 months agoAileen
7 months agoShalon
7 months agoFrankie
7 months agoJulianna
8 months agoLuisa
8 months agoElza
8 months agoChau
8 months agoElly
9 months agoSanjuana
9 months agoJanna
9 months agoMartina
9 months agoSabra
10 months agoHuey
10 months agoArgelia
10 months agoEdelmira
10 months agoMariann
11 months agoLindsey
11 months agoEmiko
11 months agoDaron
11 months agoKaty
12 months agoViva
12 months agoCherry
1 year agoKaran
1 year agoFrancisca
1 year agoGeorgiann
1 year agoTula
1 year agoChauncey
1 year agoLajuana
1 year agoPercy
1 year agoElmira
1 year agojalolag
1 year agoMari
1 year agoJaime
2 years agoBeckie
2 years agoCurtis
2 years agoDorothy
2 years agoDesirae
2 years agoAndree
2 years agoRosio
2 years agoArletta
2 years agoTeri
2 years agoAugustine
2 years agoQuiana
2 years agoTori
2 years agoKallie
2 years agoAlise
2 years agoMike
2 years agoStaci
2 years agoJulio
2 years agoAnnice
2 years agoAnnabelle
2 years agoElli
2 years agoCarisa
2 years agoEugene
2 years agoAdelina
2 years agoReed
2 years agoCecil
2 years agoPeggie
2 years agoMi
2 years agoLashonda
2 years agoCletus
2 years agoCharlesetta
2 years agoLanie
2 years agoAmos
2 years agoWilford
2 years agoBeckie
2 years agoAleta
2 years agoDaniel
2 years ago