New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L6M9 Exam - Topic 2 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L6M9 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 2
[All L6M9 Questions]

Andrea is the Chief Financial Officer at Big Corporation and is completing a Variance Analysis. She has reviewed the production costs of creating item B, and this month's costs show a variance to budget of -200. What does this mean?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A negative variance to budget means that the company spent 200 less than expected, which is a positive outcome. While it may seem counterintuitive, a negative variance in this context indicates cost savings rather than overspending. Option D is incorrect because the organisation has saved 200, not gained it. (See p.198)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Carol
16 hours ago
I agree, option A is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
6 days ago
Definitely, -200 indicates overspending.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
11 days ago
Agreed, A is the right choice here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
16 days ago
Wait, how can they lose 200 if it's just a variance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
21 days ago
I thought a negative variance meant a gain?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
26 days ago
Definitely means more money was spent than planned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
1 month ago
I'm with Dana on this one. Less spending is better for the bottom line. Option B for the win!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
1 month ago
Haha, option D? Gaining 200? That's wishful thinking. It's gotta be A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
1 month ago
C'mon, people. It's clearly option A. The CFO wouldn't be happy about spending more than the budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
2 months ago
I think B is the right answer. Less money spent than expected is a good thing, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
2 months ago
I’m confused about the terminology. If they spent less, wouldn’t that be a gain? I’m torn between B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
I feel like this is tricky. A -200 variance could mean they spent less, but I thought that was a positive outcome? Maybe it's B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
2 months ago
I think it means more money was spent than expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
2 months ago
I remember a practice question where a negative variance indicated overspending, but I'm not entirely sure if it applies here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
2 months ago
Definitely A. Negative variances are never good news for the CFO!
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
3 months ago
That's a negative variance, so A is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
3 months ago
Option A is correct. A negative variance means more money was spent than expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
3 months ago
I think a negative variance means that costs were higher than budgeted, so I would lean towards option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
3 months ago
Got it, I think I've got this now. A negative variance of -200 means Big Corporation spent $200 more than they had planned to on producing item B. The right answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
4 months ago
Based on my knowledge of variance analysis, a negative variance indicates unfavorable performance - the organization spent more than they had budgeted for. So the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
4 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. Is a negative variance always bad, or could it potentially be good in some cases? I'll need to double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
4 months ago
Okay, let's see here. A negative variance means actual costs were higher than budgeted, so the answer must be A) More money was spent than expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
4 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a straightforward variance analysis question. I'll need to think through the meaning of a negative variance to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel