Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 36 Discussion

Are tactical ploys only used in distributive approach?
B) No, because tactical ploys will be more effective with integrative approach and C) Yes, because tactical ploys will help to gain insights into the other party's interests
A) No, because tactical ploys strengthen the other party's position
D) Yes, because they will be irritants to long-term relationship

CIPS L4M5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M5 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 4
[All L4M5 Questions]

Are tactical ploys only used in distributive approach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Trust may create value as following:

LO 1, AC 1.4


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Colby
8 months ago
Yes, but they can also backfire if not used wisely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
8 months ago
Actually, they can strengthen relationships too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure they only help in distributive scenarios?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
9 months ago
I totally agree, they work better in integrative settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
9 months ago
Tactical ploys can be used in both approaches!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
9 months ago
I lean towards saying yes, because I remember that tactical ploys can create tension, which might hurt long-term relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
9 months ago
I feel like the question is tricky. I thought tactical ploys were mainly for distributive approaches, but maybe they can also help in understanding interests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
9 months ago
I think I read somewhere that tactical ploys are more effective in integrative negotiations, but I can't recall the exact reasons why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
9 months ago
I remember discussing how tactical ploys can actually be used in both approaches, but I'm not sure if they strengthen the other party's position.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the inverse square law is involved, but I'm not confident I can apply it correctly. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards A as well. Seems like the most responsible way to handle this. Gotta protect that client data, you know? The other options just don't seem appropriate here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
9 months ago
I think the tensile strength of the metal isn't directly related to erosion-corrosion, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards B. The 12b-1 fees, management fees, and brokerage costs all seem like they would be included in the expense ratio, but I'm not sure about the redemption fees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
10 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Isn't there something about the Court preempting state constitutions that have their own privacy protections? Or was that a different case? I'll have to review my notes to make sure I'm not missing something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
10 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I'm not sure if I should go with A and admit I don't know, or try to redirect the question somehow. Maybe option D would work, but I'm not totally confident about that. I'll have to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
1 year ago
Tactical ploys? More like 'tactical fools', am I right? Ba-dum-tss!
upvoted 0 times
Gussie
1 year ago
D) Yes, because they will be irritants to long-term relationship
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
1 year ago
C) Yes, because tactical ploys will help to gain insights into the other party's interests
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 year ago
A) No, because tactical ploys strengthen the other party's position
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
1 year ago
B) No, because tactical ploys will be more effective with integrative approach
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
1 year ago
C) Yes, because tactical ploys will help to gain insights into the other party's interests
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
1 year ago
A) No, because tactical ploys strengthen the other party's position
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefan
1 year ago
Option C is tempting, but I'm not convinced. Tactical ploys are more about gaining an advantage, not necessarily gaining insights into the other party's interests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
Hmm, I don't know. Option D sounds like it could be right - tactical ploys might come across as irritants and damage the long-term relationship.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
1 year ago
D) Yes, because they will be irritants to long-term relationship
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
1 year ago
A) No, because tactical ploys strengthen the other party's position
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luis
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. Option A seems more plausible - tactical ploys could actually strengthen the other party's position, making the negotiation more adversarial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
1 year ago
But won't they harm the long-term relationship?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
Tactical ploys can be used in both distributive and integrative approaches, but I think option B is correct. Integrative negotiation focuses on finding mutual gains, and tactical ploys can help uncover the other party's interests.
upvoted 0 times
Arlyne
1 year ago
So, it seems like tactical ploys can be beneficial in both approaches then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
1 year ago
That's true, but they can also help gain insights into the other party's interests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
1 year ago
But wouldn't tactical ploys also be seen as irritants in the long-term relationship?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
1 year ago
I agree, using tactical ploys in integrative approach can lead to better outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alison
1 year ago
I agree with Yuki, they can be effective in integrative approach too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
1 year ago
I think tactical ploys can be used in both approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel