Option C is tempting, but I'm not convinced. Tactical ploys are more about gaining an advantage, not necessarily gaining insights into the other party's interests.
I'm not sure about that. Option A seems more plausible - tactical ploys could actually strengthen the other party's position, making the negotiation more adversarial.
Tactical ploys can be used in both distributive and integrative approaches, but I think option B is correct. Integrative negotiation focuses on finding mutual gains, and tactical ploys can help uncover the other party's interests.
Vinnie
15 days agoJoaquin
3 days agoStefan
19 days agoKenneth
26 days agoFelix
4 days agoGretchen
9 days agoLuis
27 days agoFrancesco
29 days agoDierdre
30 days agoCarmen
10 days agoAlison
30 days agoYuki
1 months ago