Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS L4M5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M5 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 4
[All L4M5 Questions]

Are tactical ploys only used in distributive approach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Trust may create value as following:

LO 1, AC 1.4


by Arminda at Jan 07, 2023, 09:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L4M5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Colby
7 months ago
Yes, but they can also backfire if not used wisely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
7 months ago
Actually, they can strengthen relationships too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure they only help in distributive scenarios?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
7 months ago
I totally agree, they work better in integrative settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
7 months ago
Tactical ploys can be used in both approaches!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
8 months ago
I lean towards saying yes, because I remember that tactical ploys can create tension, which might hurt long-term relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
8 months ago
I feel like the question is tricky. I thought tactical ploys were mainly for distributive approaches, but maybe they can also help in understanding interests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
8 months ago
I think I read somewhere that tactical ploys are more effective in integrative negotiations, but I can't recall the exact reasons why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
8 months ago
I remember discussing how tactical ploys can actually be used in both approaches, but I'm not sure if they strengthen the other party's position.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the inverse square law is involved, but I'm not confident I can apply it correctly. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards A as well. Seems like the most responsible way to handle this. Gotta protect that client data, you know? The other options just don't seem appropriate here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
8 months ago
I think the tensile strength of the metal isn't directly related to erosion-corrosion, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards B. The 12b-1 fees, management fees, and brokerage costs all seem like they would be included in the expense ratio, but I'm not sure about the redemption fees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
8 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Isn't there something about the Court preempting state constitutions that have their own privacy protections? Or was that a different case? I'll have to review my notes to make sure I'm not missing something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
8 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I'm not sure if I should go with A and admit I don't know, or try to redirect the question somehow. Maybe option D would work, but I'm not totally confident about that. I'll have to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
1 year ago
Tactical ploys? More like 'tactical fools', am I right? Ba-dum-tss!
upvoted 0 times
Gussie
12 months ago
D) Yes, because they will be irritants to long-term relationship
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
1 year ago
C) Yes, because tactical ploys will help to gain insights into the other party's interests
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 year ago
A) No, because tactical ploys strengthen the other party's position
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
1 year ago
B) No, because tactical ploys will be more effective with integrative approach
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
1 year ago
C) Yes, because tactical ploys will help to gain insights into the other party's interests
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
1 year ago
A) No, because tactical ploys strengthen the other party's position
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefan
1 year ago
Option C is tempting, but I'm not convinced. Tactical ploys are more about gaining an advantage, not necessarily gaining insights into the other party's interests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
Hmm, I don't know. Option D sounds like it could be right - tactical ploys might come across as irritants and damage the long-term relationship.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
1 year ago
D) Yes, because they will be irritants to long-term relationship
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
1 year ago
A) No, because tactical ploys strengthen the other party's position
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luis
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. Option A seems more plausible - tactical ploys could actually strengthen the other party's position, making the negotiation more adversarial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
1 year ago
But won't they harm the long-term relationship?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
Tactical ploys can be used in both distributive and integrative approaches, but I think option B is correct. Integrative negotiation focuses on finding mutual gains, and tactical ploys can help uncover the other party's interests.
upvoted 0 times
Arlyne
12 months ago
So, it seems like tactical ploys can be beneficial in both approaches then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
1 year ago
That's true, but they can also help gain insights into the other party's interests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
1 year ago
But wouldn't tactical ploys also be seen as irritants in the long-term relationship?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
1 year ago
I agree, using tactical ploys in integrative approach can lead to better outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alison
1 year ago
I agree with Yuki, they can be effective in integrative approach too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
1 year ago
I think tactical ploys can be used in both approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel