Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute CFA-Level-II Exam - Topic 3 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 3
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

Ernie Smith and Jama! Sims are analysts with the firm of Madison Consultants. Madison provides statistical modeling and advice to portfolio managers throughout the United States and Canada.

In an effort to estimate future cash flows and value the Canadian stock market. Smith has been examining* the country's aggregate retail sales. He runs two autoregressive regression models in an attempt to determine whether there are any patterns in the data, utilizing nine years of unadjusted monthly retail sales data. One model uses a lag one variable and the other adds a lag twelve variable. The results of both regressions are shown in Exhibits 1 and 2.

Sims has been assigned the task of valuing the U .S . stock market and uses data similar to the data that Smith uses for Canada. He decides, however, that the data should be transformed. He takes the natural log of the data and uses it in the following model:

Smith and Sims are concerned that the data for Canadian retail sales may be more appropriately modeled with an ARCH process. Smith states, that in order to find out, he would take the residuals from the original autoregressive model for Canadian retail sales and then square them.

Sims states that these residuals would then be regressed against the Canadian retail sales data using the

where e represents the residual terms from the original regression and X represents the Canadian retail sales data. If is statistically different from zero, then the regression model contains an ARCH process.

Smith also examines the quarterly inflation data for an emerging market over the past nine years. He models the data using an autoregressive model with a lag one independent variable which he finds is statistically different from zero. He wonders whether he should also include lag two and lag four terms, given the magnitude of the autocorrelations of the residuals shown in Exhibit 4, assuming a 5% significance level. The critical t-values, assuming a 5% significance level and 35 degrees of freedom, are 2.03 for a two-tail test and 1.69 for a one-tail test.

where: FF is the Federal Funds rate in the United States (US), and BY is the bond yield in the European Union (E) and Great Britain (B).

Before he runs this regression, he investigates the characteristics of the dependent and independent variables. He finds that the Federal Funds rate in the United States and the bond yield in Great Britain have a unit root but that the bond yield in the European Union does not. Furthermore, the Federal Funds rate in the United States and the bond yield in Great Britain are cointegrated but the Federal Funds rate in the United States and the bond yield in the European Union are not.

Regarding Smith's emerging market regression, should lag two and lag four terms be included in the regression?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The value of the 2-year floor is equal 10 the value of a comparable 1-year European put option (a 1-ycar 'floorlet') plus the value of a comparable 2-year put option (a 2-year 'floorlet'). A 1-year floorlet with an annual payoff is the same as a 1-year put option on annual LIBOR. Therefore the value of the 2-ycar put option is equal to the value of the 2-year floor less the value of the 1 -year put option: $285,000 - $90,000 = $ 195,000. (Study Session 17, LOS 62.b)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tonette
4 months ago
Only Lag 2 makes sense to me, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
4 months ago
I think both lags should be included for better accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about those residuals? Sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
4 months ago
The ARCH process could really change the game here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
4 months ago
Smith's using nine years of data, that's solid!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
5 months ago
I recall that if the autocorrelations are still significant after lag one, it suggests that the model is not fully capturing the dynamics. So, including lag two and lag four could be important, but I’m not entirely sure which one to prioritize.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to decide on lag terms based on residual analysis. I think if lag one is significant, we should look closely at the autocorrelations for lag two and lag four.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the critical t-values. I think if the autocorrelations are significant, we might need to include both lag two and lag four, but I need to double-check the significance levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
5 months ago
I remember discussing how to determine whether to include additional lags based on autocorrelation. If the residuals show significant autocorrelations, it might be necessary to add those lags.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
6 months ago
I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to systematically work through each part of the question, applying the right statistical methods at each step. If I stay focused and don't get tripped up, I should be able to arrive at the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
6 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to make sure I fully understand the ARCH process and how to test for it, as well as the implications of the unit root and cointegration findings for the other regression. Gotta be careful with all these statistical techniques.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key seems to be evaluating the autocorrelations of the residuals from the original regression model for the emerging market inflation data. I'll need to compare those to the critical t-values to decide if I should include the lag 2 and lag 4 terms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a complex question with a lot of moving parts. I'll need to carefully review the information provided and the statistical concepts involved to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
11 months ago
I heard Ernie's model was so complicated, it took a whole team of analysts just to figure out how to turn on his calculator!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
11 months ago
Hmm, the cointegration analysis on the macroeconomic variables is quite interesting. I'd say including both lag two and lag four terms in the emerging market regression is a safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
11 months ago
Haha, Ernie and Jama are really getting into the nitty-gritty of statistical modeling! I wonder if they'll need to break out the ARCH process to tame those pesky Canadian retail sales.
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
10 months ago
Yeah, Lag 2 seems like it could provide valuable insights based on the autocorrelations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
10 months ago
I think they should include Lag 2 in the regression for the emerging market data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
10 months ago
I know, it's impressive how they're using different models to estimate future cash flows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
10 months ago
Smith and Sims are really diving deep into the data analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimberlie
11 months ago
Wow, the autocorrelation in the residuals is pretty high. I think including lag two and lag four terms could definitely improve the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
11 months ago
The autoregressive model with lag one variable seems to capture the patterns in the data pretty well. I'm not sure adding more lags is necessary.
upvoted 0 times
Jarvis
9 months ago
Let's stick with the lag one variable for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
9 months ago
I think adding more lags might overcomplicate the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
9 months ago
I agree, the lag one variable model seems sufficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
1 year ago
I agree with Latrice, only lag 4 should be included in the regression.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe only lag 4 should be included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
1 year ago
I think both lag two and lag four terms should be included.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel