Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute CFA-Level-II Exam - Topic 2 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 2
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

William Rogers, a fixed-income portfolio manager, needs to eliminate a large cash position in his portfolio. He would like to purchase some corporate bonds. Two bonds that he is evaluating are shown in Exhibit I. These two bonds are from the same issuer, and the current call price for the callable bond is 100. Assume that the issuer will call if the bond price exceeds the call price.

Rogers is also concerned about increases in interest rates and is considering the purchase of a putable bond. He ants to determine how assumed increases or decreases in interest rate volatility affect the value of the straight bonds and bonds with embedded options. After Rogers performs some analysis, he and his supervisor, Sigourney Walters, discuss the relative price movement between the two bonds in Exhibit 1 when interest rates change significantly

During the discussions, Rogers makes the following statements:

Statement 1: If the volatility of interest rates decreases, the value of the callable bond will increase.

Statement 2: The noncallable bond will not be affected by a change in the volatility or level of interest rates.

Statement 3: When interest rates decrease, the value of the noncallable bond increases by more than the callable bond.

Statement4: If the volatility of interest rates increases, the value of the putable bond will increase.

Walters mentors Rogers on bond concepts and then asks him to consider the pricing of a third bond. The third bond has five years to maturity, a 6% annual coupon, and pays interest semiannually. The bond is both callable and putable at 100 at any time. Walters indicates that the holders of the bond's embedded options will exercise if the option is in-the-money.

Rogers obtained the prices shown in Exhibit b using software that generates an interest rate lattice. He uses his software to generate the interest rate lattice shown in Exhibit 2.

Exhibit 2: Interest Rate Lattice (Annualized Interest Rates)

Evaluate Rogers' statements.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Norris is incorrect regarding the convenience yield. The price of an index futures contract is reduced by cash flows from the underlying asset, but the reduction comes from the future value of the cash flows, not from an implied cost for retaining the use of the underlying asset. The comment regarding the difference between the futures and forward contracts is also incorrect. In a flat (constant) interest rate environment (indicated in the first paragraph of the item set), there Is no difference in the prices of futures or forward contracts. The part of the comment relating to credit risk is correct. Since the forward contracts are not marked to market each day, the value is not reset to zero each day and credit risk is higher since large losses are allowed to accumulate. Thus, the credit risk would increase if forwards were used instead of futures. (Study Session 16, LOS 59.c,d)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Timothy
4 months ago
I think Statement 4 is spot on! Putable bonds gain value with higher volatility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
4 months ago
Statement 3 makes sense; noncallable bonds should rise more with falling rates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
5 months ago
Wait, how can the noncallable bond be unaffected? Sounds wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
5 months ago
Totally agree, Statement 1 is off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
5 months ago
Callable bonds usually lose value when volatility decreases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
5 months ago
I believe Statement 4 is correct because putable bonds gain value when volatility increases, but I need to double-check how that interacts with interest rates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
6 months ago
Statement 3 seems tricky. I recall that noncallable bonds usually have more price appreciation when rates drop, but I can't quite remember the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
6 months ago
I think Statement 2 is definitely wrong; noncallable bonds should still react to interest rate changes, right? I feel like I saw a practice question about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
6 months ago
I remember that callable bonds generally lose value when interest rates fall because they can be called away, but I'm not sure if that means their value increases with lower volatility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is understanding how the embedded options affect the bond values. I'll need to be careful in my analysis, but I feel reasonably confident I can work through this step-by-step and arrive at the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
6 months ago
This is a good opportunity to apply my bond pricing knowledge. I'll start by mapping out the cash flows for each bond type and then use the interest rate lattice to estimate their values under different scenarios. That should help me evaluate the accuracy of Rogers' statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the putable bond statement. Wouldn't higher volatility actually increase the value of the put option? I'll need to double-check my understanding of how embedded options work. And the comparison between the callable and noncallable bonds also has me scratching my head.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. The first statement about the callable bond's value increasing with lower volatility seems reasonable, since lower volatility would make the call option less valuable. But I'm not sure about the other statements - I'll need to think through the impact of rate changes on the different bond types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the bond characteristics and the interest rate lattice to evaluate Rogers' statements. I'll start by looking at the impact of volatility changes on the callable and putable bonds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
11 months ago
You know, I bet Sigourney Walters is regretting this whole 'mentoring' thing right about now. Keeping up with all these bond concepts is like trying to herd cats. I'm just going to go with the flow and see what happens.
upvoted 0 times
Keneth
10 months ago
It's definitely a complex topic, but they seem to be working through it together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
10 months ago
Walters is guiding Rogers through the analysis of the bond pricing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
10 months ago
Let's hope for Walters' sake that Rogers gets it together soon.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
10 months ago
I wonder if Rogers will figure it out before Walters loses her mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
10 months ago
Yeah, Walters must have the patience of a saint to mentor him.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
10 months ago
Rogers seems to be confident in his statements about the bond values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
11 months ago
I think Rogers needs to brush up on his bond concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lettie
12 months ago
Alright, let's see... If the volatility decreases, the callable bond's value should increase, right? And the putable bond's value should go up with higher volatility. Looks like I've got this figured out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
12 months ago
Wait, are we talking about bonds or a game of Twister? This volatility stuff is making my head spin. I'll just go with option B and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
Latrice
11 months ago
I agree, let's go with option B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
11 months ago
I think Statement 4 is correct. The value of the putable bond will increase if the volatility of interest rates increases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katheryn
12 months ago
I believe Statement 4 is correct. Putable bond value increases with volatility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
12 months ago
I agree with you, Christiane. Statement 1 seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
12 months ago
Hmm, this question is trickier than I thought. I'm not sure if Statement 1 is correct, but I think Statement 2 might be on the money.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
12 months ago
I think Statement 1 is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel