Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute CFA-Level-II Exam - Topic 2 Question 107 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 107
Topic #: 2
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

Michael Robbins, CFA, is analyzing Universal Home Supplies, Inc. (UHS), which has recently gone through some extensive restructuring.

Universal Home Supplies, Inc.

UHS operates nearly 200 department stores and 78 specialty stores in over 30 states. The company offers a wide range of products, including women's, men's, and children's clothing and accessories as well as home furnishings, electronics, and other consumer goods. The company is considering cutting back on or eliminating its electronics business entirely. UHS manufactures many of its own apparel products domestically in a large factory located in Kentucky. This central location permits shipping to distribution points around the country at reasonable costs. The company operates primarily in suburban shopping malls and offers mid- to high-end merchandise mainly under its own private label. At present more than 70% of the company's customers live within a 10-minute drive of one of the company's stores. Web site activity measured in dollar sales volume has increased by over 18% in the past year. Shares of UHS stock are currently priced at $25. Dividends are expected to grow at a rate of 6% over the next eight years and then continue to grow at that same rate indefinitely. The company has a cost of capital of 10.2%, a beta of 0.8, and just paid an annual dividend of $1.25.

UHS has faced serious cash flow problems in recent years as a consequence of its strategy to pursue an upscale clientele in the face of increased competition from several "niche retailers." The firm has been able to issue new debt recently and has also managed to extend its line of credit. The two financing agreements required a pledge of additional assets and a promise to install a super-efficient inventory tracking system in time to meet holiday shopping demand.

Robbins is asked by his supervisor to carefully consider the advantages and drawbacks of using the price-to-sales ratio (P/S) and to determine the appropriate valuation metrics to use when returns follow patterns of persistence or reversals.

Robbins also estimates a cross-sectional model to predict UHS's P/E:

predicted P/E = 5 - (10 x beta) + [3 x 4-year average ROE(%)]

+ [2 X 5-ycar growth forecast(%)]

Robbins should conclude that patterns of persistence or reversals in returns provide the most appropriate rationale for valuation using:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The belief that there are patterns of persistence or reversals in returns provides the rationale for valuation using relative strength indicators. There has been a considerable amount of empirical research in this area. Research suggests that the investment horizon is also an important determining factor in the appearance of these patterns. (Study Session 12, LOS 42.t)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Arthur
4 months ago
I agree, unexpected earnings might be the way to go for valuation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
4 months ago
Their web sales are up 18%—that's a good sign!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
4 months ago
Wait, are they really considering dropping electronics? That seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
4 months ago
I think cutting the electronics line could hurt them more than help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
4 months ago
UHS has a beta of 0.8, which is pretty low.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
5 months ago
I recall that relative-strength indicators can help assess momentum, but I'm not sure if they fit well with the persistence or reversal patterns mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards standardized unexpected earnings as the rationale for valuation, but I feel a bit uncertain. I remember it being important for understanding return patterns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
5 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question about predicting P/E ratios, but I can't recall the exact formula. The components seem familiar, though, especially the ROE part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
5 months ago
I remember studying the price-to-sales ratio and how it can be useful for companies with cash flow issues like UHS. But I'm not entirely sure how it compares to other metrics in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
6 months ago
This is a tricky one. There are a lot of moving parts to consider, like the company's restructuring, financing agreements, and inventory tracking system. I'll need to really dive into the details to make sure I'm approaching this the right way.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to identify whether the company's returns are persistent or reversing, and then use the appropriate valuation method. I'll need to analyze the data and make that determination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different valuation ratios and how they apply to this situation. I'll need to carefully review the information provided and think through the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
6 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I'll focus on understanding the company's financials and valuation metrics to determine the appropriate approach for handling patterns of persistence or reversals in returns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
6 months ago
But what about standardized unexpected earnings? Could that be a better option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
8 months ago
I agree, unexpected earnings can provide valuable insights into the company's performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. I'd need to review the differences between unexpected earnings, relative-strength indicators, and standardized unexpected earnings to make a confident choice.
upvoted 0 times
Ardella
6 months ago
User 3: I believe relative-strength indicators could be useful in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
7 months ago
User 2: I'm leaning towards standardized unexpected earnings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
7 months ago
User 1: I think unexpected earnings might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecilia
8 months ago
I think the answer is C. Standardized unexpected earnings provide the most appropriate rationale for valuation when returns show patterns of persistence or reversals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
8 months ago
I think using unexpected earnings for valuation makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel