Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute CFA-Level-II Exam - Topic 1 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 1
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

Mike Diffle has been asked to evaluate the bonds of Hardin, Inc. The specific issue Diffle is considering has an 8% annual coupon and matures in two years. The bonds are currently callable at 101, and beginning in six months, they are callable at par. Bratton Corp, a competitor of Hardin's, also has bonds outstanding which are identical to Hardin's except that they are not callable. Diffle believes that the AA rating of both bonds is an accurate reflection of their credit risk. Diffle is wondering if the Bratton bonds might be a better investment than the Hardin bonds. Assume that the following 1-year interest rate tree is used to value bonds with a maturity of up to three years (this tree assumes interest rate volatility of 10%).

Also, assume that the appropriate spot rates for securities maturing in one, two, and three years are 7.25%, 7.5%, and 7.80%, respectively.

Diffle believes he should begin his analysis with the option-free Bratton bonds. He decides to consider two different approaches to valuing the Bratton Bonds---one that uses the current spot rate curve and another that uses the interest rate tree given above.

For the next step in his analysis, Diffle has decided to calculate the value of the Hardin bonds using the interest rate tree. His assumption is that the bond will be called ai any node of the tree where the calculated value exceeds the call price. Diffle summarizes the results of his bond valuation analysis in a memo to his supervisor, Luke Puldo. In this memo, Diffle makes the following statements:

Statement 1: The value of the option embedded in the Hardin bonds can be derived by simply subtracting the interest rate tree value of the Hardin bonds from the interest rate tree value of the Bratton bonds.

Statement 2: I am concerned that the 10% volatility assumption used to develop the interest rate tree might be too low. A higher volatility assumption would result in a lower value for the Hardin bonds.

After reviewing Diffle's analysis, Puldo notes that Diffle has not included any information on the option adjusted spread (OAS) for the Hardin bonds. Puldo suggests that Diffle should evaluate the OAS in order to get an idea of the liquidity risk of the Hardin bonds. Diffle counters that the OAS may not be very informative in this case, since he is uncertain as to the reliability of the interest rate volatility assumption.

To finish his analysis, Diffle would like to use his binomial model to evaluate the interest rate risk of both the Hardin bonds and the Bratton bonds. Diffle has shocked interest rates by 25 basis points throughout the interest rate tree he has been using to value the two bond issues. Using the new rates, Diffle has calculated values for the bonds assuming a 25-basis-point increase or decrease in rates. He plans to use these values as inputs into the following formulas for duration and convexity:

Indicate whether the statements made by Diffle in his memo regarding the value of the embedded option and the effect of the volatility assumption are correct.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The payoff is zero for a down-move and 11.75 for an up-move. Since the probability of

an up-move is 0.607 the present value is

(Study Session 17, LOS60.b)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Viola
4 months ago
Both statements can't be right, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
4 months ago
I agree, the embedded option value calculation seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
4 months ago
Not sure about that volatility assumption, seems a bit low.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
5 months ago
I think the OAS is crucial for assessing liquidity risk!
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
5 months ago
Hardin bonds have an 8% coupon and are callable at 101.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
5 months ago
I vaguely recall that a higher volatility assumption generally leads to a higher value for options, so Diffle's statement about it lowering the value of Hardin bonds seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
5 months ago
I feel like Diffle's concern about the OAS is valid, but I also think he might be overthinking it. The OAS could still provide some insights into liquidity risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question about callable bonds, and I think the volatility assumption can really impact the valuation, especially if it's too low.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
6 months ago
I remember that the value of the embedded option should be calculated carefully, but I'm not sure if subtracting the Hardin bond value from the Bratton bond value is the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
6 months ago
This is a great opportunity to practice my bond valuation skills. I'm feeling confident that I can work through the calculations and come up with a solid recommendation for Diffle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
6 months ago
I'm a bit worried about the volatility assumption. If it's too low, that could significantly impact the value of the Hardin bonds. I'll need to do some sensitivity analysis to see how much of a difference that makes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
6 months ago
Okay, let's break this down step-by-step. First, I'll need to evaluate the Bratton bonds using the spot rate curve and the interest rate tree. Then I can compare that to the Hardin bonds and see if the embedded option is priced correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
6 months ago
This question seems pretty complex, with a lot of different factors to consider. I'll need to carefully read through the details and make sure I understand the key information before attempting to solve it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
11 months ago
Diffle's really going for it with this analysis! Gotta hand it to him for diving in, even if he's a bit off the mark.
upvoted 0 times
Eveline
9 months ago
It's impressive how thorough he's being, even if he may be missing some key points.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
10 months ago
I agree, he's really putting in the effort to evaluate these bonds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
10 months ago
Diffle is really digging deep into this analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rikki
11 months ago
OAS might still be useful here, even with the iffy volatility. Could give a sense of the liquidity risk.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
9 months ago
Diffle: The OAS may not be very informative due to uncertainty about the interest rate volatility assumption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
9 months ago
Puldo: We should evaluate the OAS for the Hardin bonds to understand the liquidity risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
10 months ago
Diffle: The OAS may not be very informative due to uncertainty about the interest rate volatility assumption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
10 months ago
Puldo: We should evaluate the OAS for the Hardin bonds to understand the liquidity risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
10 months ago
Diffle: OAS might still be useful here, even with the iffy volatility. Could give a sense of the liquidity risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
11 months ago
Diffle: OAS might still be useful here, even with the iffy volatility. Could give a sense of the liquidity risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dell
11 months ago
I believe the correct answer is C) Both statements are correct. Diffle seems to have a good grasp on the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
11 months ago
I agree. It's interesting to see how he is considering different approaches to valuing the bonds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
11 months ago
Hmm, wonder if Diffle's volatility assumption is too low. Higher vol could really affect the Hardin bond valuation.
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
11 months ago
Puldo is right to suggest evaluating the OAS for the Hardin bonds to understand the liquidity risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
11 months ago
Diffle should definitely consider the impact of a higher volatility assumption on the Hardin bond valuation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laticia
11 months ago
I think Diffle's analysis is quite thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
12 months ago
The value of the embedded option can't be derived that simply. Gotta take into account the call feature and how it impacts the bond value.
upvoted 0 times
Julie
10 months ago
Taking the call feature into account is crucial for accurate bond valuation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
11 months ago
Diffle should reevaluate his approach to valuing the embedded option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
11 months ago
The call feature can impact the bond value significantly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
11 months ago
Diffle should consider the call feature when valuing the embedded option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel